This sermon is from the Rev. Charles G. Dennison sermon archive, part of the “Philippians” series, and was preached at Grace Orthodox Presbyterian Church in Sewickley, PA, during a worship service on Sunday, September 1, 1991.
About this sermon
The Gospels, Paul’s letters, and Revelation together confirm that Jesus Christ is God, and the case rests on far more than a single proof text. Mark 2’s healing of the paralytic gives one clear instance. Scripture holds Christ’s divinity and humanity together, and neither crowds out the other.
Sermon transcript
Tonight we are looking first of all at the Gospel of Mark, and we will be reading the first twelve verses of this chapter. This is Mark chapter two, verses one through twelve. Hear the word of God. And when he had come back to Capernaum several days afterward, it was heard that he was at home.
And many were gathered together so that there was no longer room even near the door, and he was speaking the word to them. And they came, bringing to him a paralytic carried by four men. And being unable to get to him on account of the crowd, they removed the roof above him And when they had dug an opening, they let down the pallet on which the paralytic was lying. And Jesus, seeing their faith, said to the paralytic, My son, your sins are forgiven. But there were some of the scribes sitting there and reasoning in their hearts.
Why does this man speak that way? He is blaspheming. Who can forgive sins but God alone? And immediately, Jesus, perceiving in his spirit that they were reasoning that way within themselves, said to them, Why are you reasoning about these things in your hearts?
Which is easier, to say to the paralytic, Your sins are forgiven, or to say, Arise and take up your pallet and walk? But in order that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins, he said to the paralytic, I say to you, Rise, take up your pallet and go home.
And he rose and immediately took up the pallet and went out in the sight of all, so that they were all amazed and were glorifying God, saying, We have never seen anything like this.” Then turning over to Philippians chapter 2, reading verses 5 through 11 this evening from the New American Standard Version. have this attitude among themselves, which was also in Christ Jesus, who, although he existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a bondservant and being made in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. Therefore, also God highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
Now, this evening, we want to finish up what we started this morning. We have been looking at Philippians 2, verses 5 through 11, and considering in these verses the sublime Christology that is set forth here for us, the sublime doctrine of Christ. We have concluded Although there are those who would disagree with us, we have concluded that this text expresses the very highest Christology. And that this Christology or doctrine of Christ so expressed is actually the foundation for the church’s later confession concerning the full deity and the full humanity of Jesus Christ. Now we have concentrated, as we have looked at this passage, we have concentrated upon the clear assertions in it that Jesus Christ is divine. That he is, after all, fully divine. That he is God. That he is God come in the flesh.
Question that we ask. This evening, although there are some who wouldn’t even grant us this interpretation of this particular text, the question that we ask is whether or not this text is an exception in the New Testament, or is it of a piece with what we find woven throughout. We are moving on then tonight to consider the New Testament revelation with regard to the full deity of Jesus Christ. Having this morning looked at the Old Testament and found in it an affirmation that the Messiah who was promised would in fact be fully divine, God himself coming to save his people. Does the New Testament call Jesus God?
Well, we have already left the cat out of the bag. From our perspective, absolutely. We have seen that from the text in hand, this passage in Philippians chapter two, As the Apostle Paul makes mention of the fact that this one who is the Son, this one who is identified as Christ Jesus, existed, he says, verse 6, in the form of God, and that he had equality with God. We are convinced that no matter how you approach these words, regardless of how you slice it up, The conviction being expressed here is certain that this one in view is divine. He is God.
Now you may recall the link up that we made this morning with respect to some other passages. We will not comment on Hebrews 1 verses 8 and 9 tonight because we already spoke of them This morning, as we look at Psalm 45, especially verse six, the writer to the Hebrews sees that text as an affirmation of the character and essence of the Son of God. He then being called in that passage, Psalm 45, verse six, God and nothing less. But we want to look beyond now Philippians two past Hebrews one for further evidence in the New Testament concerning this all important doctrine which the church has embraced.
Would you call yourself orthodox. Would you. Consider yourself to be in line with the historic confession of the Christian Church throughout the ages. If you would, then you must, I underscore must, acknowledge Jesus Christ, not just as one who comes in the flesh to save through his humanity, but one who is God in the flesh.
Any savior less than that cannot, will not save. So, what does the rest of the New Testament say with regard to this entire matter, this very important matter? Let’s look, first of all, at the Synoptic Gospels, at some representative texts. Now, when you wander into the Synoptics, you have wandered into an area that contains something of a cryptic character to it. You might recall how Jesus himself in the synoptics is concealing himself and his identity time and time again. He’s giving instruction to this person, to that. Don’t tell anybody who I am.
And so there is that cryptic character to the revelation that is given to us in the synoptic Gospels, in Matthew, Mark, and Luke. The message itself comes to us in that form in which the Savior himself is presented in those Gospels. So you might expect that the affirmation of Christ’s deity, his divine nature, might be a bit indirect.
And it is. But let’s look at Matthew chapter one as a starter. You have at the end of that chapter Matthew’s description of the birth of Christ or the preparation for it. The marvelous statement that is made, of course, in verse 21, one that I hope that you have memorized. But what I have in mind is his interest in placing before us Isaiah’s prophecy out of Isaiah’s seventh chapter, the fourteenth verse. A verse that we quoted this morning, Behold, the virgin shall be with child and shall bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel, which is translated, God with us.”
There’s a general way in which you can take that title. Oh yes, the birth of this child is symbolic of God’s presence. God is on our side. There are some interpreters that have approached this matter from that point of view. Matthew is saying something much more in quoting this text from Isaiah. He means it quite literally. Yes, this one is God with us. His presence with us means the presence of God. In himself, he is God with us.
And now, throughout Matthew’s gospel, that will be the foundation stone upon which the entirety of the Christology of this gospel is built. If you turn to the eleventh chapter of Matthew, you can follow through on this theme. Come unto me, he says. Verse 28 of that eleventh chapter. Come unto me, O you who are weary and heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
Well, is that an invitation that has ceased simply because Christ has died? simply because Christ has been raised and gone to heaven? No, you see, the impact of this gospel in its Christology is to convince the readers that this one who is God with us is still God with us.
He continues with us. That’s why in Matthew’s gospel there’s no account of the ascension. There’s no ascension. He’s still with us. And he is with us as God. Turn to the 16th chapter of Matthew. This theme will deepen. That was a punctuation point. In chapter 16, you know that we have there Christ blessing Peter for his confession, but verse 18 says this.
And I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church.” Is Christ continuing to build his church? Is he continuingly present to build his church? As such, he is God with us to do that. Turn over to chapter 18, verse 20. For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there I am in their midst. Is he still in their midst? Is he there now? Is he here now, God with us? You see the theme of Immanuel.
Then you turn over, of course, to the 28th chapter, to the conclusion to which Matthew has been pressing all along, where he reiterates his theme of the presence of God with us in Christ Christ is speaking to his disciples, he says, teaching them, that is, the nations, to observe all that I commanded you, and lo, I am with you always. I am with you, Emmanuel, as God with us even to the end of the age.
It is a very high Christology indeed that is presented for us in Matthew’s Gospel. And one, if we are alert to it, one which preaches to us the full divinity of Jesus Christ. He is building to this point throughout his gospel so that in verse 17 of that 28th chapter, you read these words, and when they saw him, that is, the disciples, they worshiped him.
But some doubt it. Then verse 19, where the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are placed on a line as equals. full divinity of the sun, so that’s Matthew. It won’t linger long over Mark, and that’s why I did read the passage from Mark. It is a common passage. It’s a passage that you find in Matthew 2, Matthew chapter 9, and also in Luke chapter 5. It’s the story of the paralytic let down, but I think you get the point, don’t you? The scribes make their accusation, who is this fellow? who imagines that he can forgive sins, only God can forgive sins. That’s the point. That’s the point. And don’t be misled when Jesus calls himself the Son of Man there. There are those who have suggested to us that the title Son of God pertains to Christ’s deity and the title Son of Man pertains to his humanity. That’s not true.
The figure of the Son of Man presented to us in Daniel chapter 7 is fully divine. To call him son of man merely says that he is the one who is the heir of the dominion of man. He shall inherit all that belongs to man and rule over it. It does not prejudice the case with regard to his humanity. It is preaching his divinity and glory as well. You must see the divinity of Christ even in the title son of man. So this one who is son of man, forgiving sins in the earth is actually God in the flesh.
All right, well, we won’t linger long on Mark. Let’s go on to Luke. Luke is the most clever. I want you to turn to the fourth chapter of Luke. The opening of that chapter records for you the temptation of Christ in the wilderness. You know the story. And I want you to notice a particular feature of this story. Verse 4, there. Jesus answered the devil who had tempted him. You know what the devil is all about. If you are the Son of God, said the devil, tell these stones to become bread. Verse 3. But then you have Jesus’ response. It is written, he said, man shall not live by bread alone.
And Luke stops there. And you say, wait a minute. You say, wait a minute. The rest of that text is that by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God, right? Well, Luke doesn’t put that in there. He leaves it out. in order to use it later. Look at verse 22. And all were speaking well of him and wondering at the gracious words, the literal translation now follows, the gracious words that were proceeding out of his mouth. The rest of verse 4 is found in verse 22, and here it’s not ascribed to God generally conceived, but of Christ himself as he speaks. As I said, Luke is the most clever.
Now I want you to turn over to chapter 8. I want you to look at verse 39. You have here the story of the demoniac cured. Wonderful story, you know it well. But get the conclusion of it in Luke’s gospel, verse 39. Notice verse 38 first, “…but the man from whom the demons had gone out was begging him that he might accompany him, But he sent him away, saying, Return to your house and describe what great things God has done for you. Keep reading now.
And he departed, that is, the demoniac, proclaiming throughout the whole city what great things Jesus had done for him. In the Greek, the words are the same. Jesus tells him, To tell everyone what great things God has done, the demoniac tells everybody what great things Jesus has done. What’s Luke’s point? Jesus is God. Here’s another passage which we won’t well on, but it appears in the trial of Christ. It has a parallel in Matthew’s gospel, but Luke 22, verse 65. Here Jesus is faced with his tormentors. This is Luke 22, verse 65.
You have them blindfolding him. They were beating him and mocking him. They were asking him, saying, who is the one who hit you.” They were saying many things, many other things against him, and Luke adds the word blasphemy. Now, why should he add that word, blasphemy? Why, in their attack upon Jesus, they are attacking, in Jesus’ person, God himself. Their attacks are blasphemy. Our conclusion? Jesus is God. Let’s move on. Let’s move on past the synoptics. Let’s look at John’s Gospel. We won’t linger here because, you know, what is a bit cryptic in the synoptics is shouted from the rooftop plain as day in John’s gospel.
There it is. You can’t even get past the opening words, and you’re bombarded with it. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. You move down to the fourteenth verse, and the Word became flesh and dwelt among us. There it is, the great wonderful matchless statement of the evangelist, John, as he proclaimed the deity of this one who is God in the flesh. There are a number of other affirmations, and many of them you’re familiar with.
You recall his argument with the Jewish authorities in Jerusalem in the eighth chapter. Read the eighth chapter. Read it again and again. It’s high drama, it’s wonderfully riffing. It moves you right along to the conclusion of the matter as Jesus presses home the case of his identity.
Verse 58, Jesus says this to these people, truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was or was born, I am or I existed. Now, we all get the point, don’t we? The Jews got the point. Jesus actually, in that instance, used the divine name, I Am, for himself.
So your teaching of John’s Gospel is that Jesus is God. Jesus says as much in the 30th verse of the 10th chapter, I and the Father are one. You might also know chapter 14, verse 9. He who has seen me has seen the Father. You might also want to take note, especially of that glorious, glorious twelfth chapter of John’s Gospel, that tremendous antidote to the Jehovah’s Witnesses.
You have John there quoting the prophet Isaiah. You have him quoting from Isaiah’s sixth chapter. For this cause,” verse 39 of that twelfth chapter, “…for this cause they could not believe, speaking of these Jews. For Isaiah said again,” now quoting from that sixth chapter of Isaiah, “…he has blinded their eyes, he has hardened their heart, lest they see with their eyes, and perceive with their heart, and be converted, and I heal them.”
That is the scene in which the glory of Jehovah appeared to Isaiah in the temple. Now hear what John says. These things Isaiah said, verse 41, because he saw his glory and spoke of him. What Isaiah saw of Jehovah’s glory in the temple was the glory of the Son of God, who is divine in himself. The glory of Jehovah is ascribed to Jesus. Underline that text, and the next time the JWs come and knock on your door, will you please show them that verse? Okay, well that’s John.
What about Paul? We already know what Paul thinks from Philippians, but there are a couple of other texts that are worth noting, and one is Romans chapter 9. verse. Romans chapter nine. Verse. You might want to pick up from verse three for I could wish that I myself were a curse separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, you are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the temple service, and the promises, whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever, amen.” Another clear, unambiguous statement from the Apostle. with regard to the deity of Jesus Christ. For one being referred to here is none other than the Christ who has been mentioned. He is over all, God-blessed forever.
Amen. Truly, amen. Turn over to Galatians. You don’t have to turn very far. It’s the first chapter of the first verse. Now, here’s a salutation to end all salutations. Paul, an apostle. Paul, an apostle, not sent from men. Get the drift of it now. Not sent from men. You understand that language now? Men. Over here. Okay? Not sent from men, nor through the agency of man. Over here.
But through Jesus Christ, over against man, it is Jesus Christ and God the Father who raised him from the dead. Now, of course, Paul isn’t denying the humanity of Jesus Christ here, but he is certainly making it clear that as far as his call is concerned, he received it from God, and operative in that call was Jesus Christ as God, as divine.
You have a number of other statements from Paul and Colossians, of course. You know those texts, possibly. There are some in Hebrews. We’ve already spoken of the doctrine as it is expounded in Hebrews, especially the eighth and ninth verses of that first chapter, but it is throughout. But finally, turning to the book of Revelation, and there are a number of affirmations of this doctrine in the book of Revelation, as you might well imagine, since it is written by John. He is the one who is so clear in his declaration of Christ’s divinity. But you might look at 5th chapter, and the conclusion of it, and the worship that is now given to the Lamb. Verse 12.
Worthy is the Lamb that was slain. to receive power and riches and wisdom and might and honor and glory and blessing and every creative thing which is in heaven and on earth and under the earth and on the sea and all things in them I heard saying to him who sits on the throne and to the land be blessing and honor and glory and power forever and ever And the four living creatures kept saying, Amen.
And the elders fell down and worshipped. Now, were they just worshipping God as if He were separated from the Lamb? Or did they worship Him who was on the throne, seated, as well as the Lamb who was present with Him? These things that are now ascribed to the Lamb Are they not ascribed to him because of his divinity, his divine nature?
The church is right. The church in her confession, in her orthodox profession, is correct. Is it not plain to you from Old Testament to New? The testimony is one. This one who has come, the one who takes the name of the Christ to himself, the one who is called Jesus, this one is God in the flesh.
God himself judges it absolutely necessary that he become man. If he does not do this, then there is no one adequate to bear the burden of his wrath, which falls upon sin and sinners. Only God Himself can survive that judgment. Only God Himself can be victorious over the grave, death, was not able to hold him down. It was impossible for death to hold him down.
That is the testimony of Peter. Only by the coming of himself to us could he repair the damage of that ruptured union. that spelled our root ruin. Only by this root could he repair that union and give blessing to us. There was no other way. He had to come himself.
And only by his coming to us Could He open up for us in a final way His own heart, and make plain to us the extent and depth of His love for us? And likewise, only by coming to us in the form of human flesh could He open up for us our true nature, For we have lost sight of it. And have become utterly confused. If not completely disillusioned.
So in this act by God. He exegetes himself. He explains himself. And he also explains you. To yourself. Who you are. For as he has proved to be servant for you. So you now by virtue of your union with him. Are to be servant one to another. well. Glorious stuff indeed. God. Become flesh.
How can anyone question the testimony? Yes, they do. So tragically. If we confess it, do we not And will we not underscore our confession of it by the way we live? Yes. Affirming that God has come to save us, making himself servant on our behalf, will we not then give ourselves with abandonment for the sake of others? That all around might be helped. For Christ’s sake. Amen.
How rich and diverse the testimony of your word, O God, but how wonderfully it evidences that unity, that common voice, that singular message from Old Testament to new. And in light of the glorious revelation that has come in Jesus Christ, we now bless the view Look upon our Old Testament and also our New Testament and understand the depths that are there. May we marvel, Lord, and may we glory in our God and not boast in ourselves. But help us, Lord, that we might live for you and please you as we live as those who are in union with the Christ who served. We pray, our Father, that we might delight in our service to you, for Christ’s sake. Amen.
The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

