This sermon is from the Rev. Charles G. Dennison sermon archive, part of the “Luke’s Christmas Story” series, and was preached at Grace Orthodox Presbyterian Church in Sewickley, PA, during a worship service on Sunday, January 4, 1998.
About this sermon
Luke’s Gospel follows Christ’s journey from Galilee to Jerusalem, and the story of the boy Jesus in the temple already traces it. His three-day absence in 2:46 foreshadows the tomb. The story shows Mary, and us, what it means to seek him.
Sermon transcript
Our scripture reading this morning is from Luke 2. We are reading from verse 41. Give your attention now to the Word of God. Now, his parents went to Jerusalem every year at the Feast of the Passover, and when he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the Feast.
And when they had fulfilled the days, as they returned, the child that Jesus carried behind in Jerusalem, and Joseph and his mother knew not of it. But they, supposing him to have been in the company, went a day’s journey. and they saw him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance. And when they found him not, they turned back to Jerusalem, seeking him. And it came to pass that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them and asking them questions, and all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers. And when they saw him, they were amazed.
And his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? Behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing. And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? know ye not that I must be about my father’s business? And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them. And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them. But his mother kept all these sayings in her heart, and Jesus increased in wisdom and stature and in favor with God and men.
Pray with me. Hear us, O God, for the sake of your Son. His great work of redemption, His merit is our hope and our security. We would pray, O God, through His mediation in the power of the Spirit, and that, O God, with the expectation and the confidence that we are heard. We would not pray simply for ourselves, but we do pray, O God, that we might hear your word. We would pray, O God, for those who are yours throughout the world, who are already assembled under the proclamation of the word and under the ministry of the means of grace. But we are asking, O Father, that you would demonstrate again the effectiveness of those means and of the preaching of the word, even as you are pleased to call your elect yourself. Father, we would rejoice as the many are brought out of darkness into light, out of death into life. May our proclamation, O God, Contribute to this end, even in keeping with your ordination. We ask this for the sake of Jesus, our Savior, who precedes us to glory. Amen.
It has been often pointed out that the longest single portion in Luke’s Gospel is preoccupied with Jesus’ journey from Galilee to Jerusalem. The account of that journey begins in the ninth chapter of Luke, verse 51. and reaches its goal in chapter 19, verse 28. The section, therefore, dealing with that journey, makes up, in whole or in part, eleven chapters in this gospel. From the sheer weight of the material alone, we can conclude that Luke, by the Holy Spirit, means to tell us in a very definite manner about this journey.
The journey is a dominant, if not the dominant theme for the Gospel, therefore. But this being the case, the theme of the journey being the dominant theme. We might well then expect this theme to be reinforced in the other portions of the gospel. This is, in fact, what we do find.
Before we are brought in this gospel to that central and conclusive journey, Luke tells us that Jesus had already made two previous journeys to Jerusalem. These two previous journeys stand close together in Luke chapter 2. and in their close proximity serve as an introduction that is a preparation for that latter greater journey. Of course, the journeys that I have in mind are those that stand side-by-side in Luke chapter 2, first verses 21 through 40, and then verses 41 through 52. The first of these passages, 21 through 40, tells us about Jesus’ journey to Jerusalem as an infant, he having been circumcised eight days after his birth. The second passage, which we have read this morning, tells us about Jesus’ journey to Jerusalem as a child at the age of twelve. The famous instance including his disappearance for three days, his parents’ search for him, and their discovery of him in the temple.
But now, what I want you to mark about these two stories are their extraordinary similarities. One obvious tip-off that similarities are intended, that these stories have a parallel structure, is that each story ends on the same note. As you read along in Luke 2, you may have noticed it for yourself.
Verse 40 in chapter 2 speaks about Jesus’ growth towards maturity, that at the end of the first journey story, but so does verse 52, the verse that concludes the second journey story. You will note further in these two verses that certain words are repeated. The words wisdom and grace, they are used in both verses, and in both verses we have comment made upon Jesus’ progress or increase in wisdom. The strong match for these two verses leads us into a review of both of the stories in search of other correspondences. Let me help you pick out the parallels.
In the first story, speaking here of verses 21 through 40, In the first story, we have mention made of Jesus’ age. He is eight days, verse 21. In story number two, he is twelve years of age, verse 42. In story one, the law is specifically introduced in the rite of circumcision and in the provisions of the law for purification following the birth of a child. Verse 21, verses 22 through 24, verse 27.
The second story introduces the law in its reference to the Feast of Passover and in its reference to the customs of the Feast, verses 41 and 42. In the second story, Inferences concerning the law are in view, particularly as Jesus has his interview before the teachers in the temple, but most specifically in verse 51, where a mention is made of the way in which Jesus subjects himself to his parents in obedience to them.
Comment upon the Fifth Amendment. Both stories, you will note, are set explicitly at the Temple in Jerusalem. Further, both mention the fulfillment of the prescribed number of days in connection with the ceremonies in view. Next, both stories record encounters in the Temple.
One story, the first story, the encounter between Jesus’ parents and Simeon and Anna, In story number two, the encounter between Jesus’ parents and Jesus himself, interesting juxtaposition. This, of course, against the background of Jesus’ encounter with the teachers in verse 46 in that latter story. Each story carries within it the theme of amazement, or even bewilderment. In each, Jesus’ parents are baffled, amazed, bewildered. Note verse 33 in the first story, verses 48 and 50 in the second. with the second story adding comment concerning the amazement of the preachers.
In the Temple, verse 47. Both stories reflect implicitly further on Mary’s confusion. Story number one in Simeon’s comment about the sword that would pierce her soul due to the controversy generated by her son, verse 35. Story two, in Mary’s natural but spiritually imperceptive and limited question, verse 48.
Story one, and also story two, Both include the theme of mystery resolved in the finding of Jesus. Simeon and Anna, those who are awaiting the consolation of Israel and the redemption of Jerusalem, find the resolution of the mystery in the presentation of the child. Joseph and Mary, clearly, have the mystery of their son’s absence resolved by the story’s end. Furthermore, both stories bear witness to Jesus’ mission.
In the first story, Sinion lays that mission before us in his comments to Jesus’ parents, verses 29 through 32, and again specifically to Mary in verses 34 and 35. In the second story, Jesus lays that witness concerning himself before his parents in verse 49. They do not realize that he must be about his father’s affairs, his father’s business in his father’s house. Both stories mention Nazareth, the town in Galilee to which the family returned after the ceremonies in Jerusalem. And finally, as I have already stated, these stories conclude on the same note, with reference made to Jesus’ maturing and growth.
Now, I know that that was, for some of you, quite an exercise. Maybe some of you were trying to write those down as I went through them. If I have counted all of the parallels between these two stories, and I’m not saying that I haven’t missed a few, it would seem that there were at least 11 obvious connections between them. Certainly enough for us to conclude that these stories do in fact belong together. There are certainly enough connections between these two stories to say that they are meant to be interpreted in terms of each other. But equally clear is the fact that our stories are not identical. As perfectly matched as they may be, they record different events twelve years apart. And it will be in noting the differences, not just the similarities, that will help us to understand better the intention of these stories. For one thing, and yes, most importantly, as we turn to this second journey story this morning in Luke chapter 2.
Jesus himself now becomes the active participant. Jesus himself becomes the active participant. In the previous story, he was but a babe in arms, neither speaking nor conspicuously active in directing the course of events. However, with this latter story, Jesus now is front and center, making decisions, determining his own actions, if not the actions of others about him.
He is making decisions that separate him, that set him over against, that separate him parents that find him in discussions and even separating himself to a degree from the temple teachers, decisions that engage him in an exchange with his parents, and decisions that lead him to submit himself to his parents as they take him back to Nazareth, their hometown. as we move from the first story to the second story, from the first journey story to the second journey story, is a picture of the incremental control that is resident in Jesus as he is even more self-consciously aware of it.
Moving him as it does from his infant years to his teenage years. The objective of these stories, however, is hardly to provide us with the pattern for perfect child-rearing. Now, not that there might not be implications, but the objective of these stories is not to provide us with a pattern here in divine and holy scripture to provide us with a pattern for perfect child-birth. Although by verses 51 and 52, Jesus appears to be the perfect teenager, he is going home in submission to his parents. His actions, however, in the course of our second story, are hardly a model for the teen years. Jesus does indeed submit himself to the convention of the family in order that we all, in and through him, may be provided a complete and perfect obedience, extending even to our teen years. into which we might then enter.
Such is the nature of the redemption that he provides us. But as much as this may be a point to the story, the greater point is that he is able to do this for us because he is distinct from us. Yes, he is flesh and bone. Yes, he has a human body like we do, yet he is set apart, he is distinct, he is divine. And there is that sense in which, in the literal nature of the case, we cannot, no, must not follow him. We cannot and must not follow him.
I definitely pursued my own independence from my parents, but I don’t recall ever pleading the high level of my spiritual attainment and interest as the excuse. But even if I had developed such a high level of spiritual attainment and interest, Would I have been justified in hiding out for three days at a conference, be it even a conference on Reformed theology, without my parents’ knowledge? I don’t think so. I really don’t think so.
Here’s the purpose, then, of this story. to encourage such independence in teenagers. It’s the purpose of this story to encourage this kind of behavior. Wander off without your parents’ knowledge, very frantically searching for you, even with sorrow. and you popping up three days later. Well, if the purpose of the story is not to encourage such behavior on the part of teenagers, what is its purpose?
That purpose is brought to light in Jesus himself and by the overarching story of salvation in which he is the central figure. The account of Jesus’ journey at age twelve to the temple in Jerusalem draws along with it the story about his journey to the same location when he was but a babe in arms. And these stories, back to back, about earlier journeys, together move us to that conclusive journey with which this gospel will end.
Jesus’ self-conscious separation from his parents becomes a deliberate act full of redemptive historical significance. In the interests of his coming separation, in the accomplishment of redemption, it will force his parents and others towards them. to their own self-conscious reflections.
In the second story, then, at the end of Luke 2, in a way filled with redemptive historical significance, you will note that it is no longer Simeon and Anna’s testimony that baffles Joseph and Mary. Instead, now it is the testimony of Jesus himself. as he supersedes and displaces Simeon and Anna, as glorious as they were. He will confound his parents, but he will also confound the teachers of the law in anticipation of his exalted and unmatched supremacy. There’s no one like him.
The mention, therefore, of the three days—and we’re waiting for this—the mention, therefore, of the three days, verse 46, becomes the clincher. It, together with the development and presentation of Jesus’ self-consciousness is in addition to the previous story. We have moved in our preparation for the great journey to the point where we are anticipating more clearly the coming crisis. In the context of and for the purpose of fulfilling of the law, speaking now with regard to that great and latter journey in the context of and for the purpose of fulfilling the law, Jesus will journey to Jerusalem where he, after fulfilling the law in his death, will be lost to Israel for three days, only to be found again by the resurrection.
He himself, in that context, bearing testimony that baffles even those closest to himself. It is of importance in this regard to realize that, as in the story recorded in verses 21 through 40, so also here in this concluding story in Luke 2, Joseph and Mary, particularly Mary, are the foils for the truth of the gospel. In the second story, Jesus’ parents are placed in the company, you will note, of the teachers of Israel who are equally battled, and who finally, in their sinful ignorance, will crucify the Lord of Glory. Left to herself, will Mary not execute her son? Left to herself, Will she not also join the teachers from the temple to conspire in execution of her son?
Oh, we all have that residual goodness. Mary, especially, she’d never do such a thing. If you answer that way, in terms of the gospel that Luke is presenting here, you are a fool. And you neither know the gospel, nor Mary. But most particularly, you do not know yourself. the matching of the amazement among the teachers, and then in Mary and in Joseph, but particularly in Mary, is testimony to you and an affirmation of the Pauline doctrine of the universal depravity of humanity. They have sinned and come short of the glory of God, and not even Mary is excluded. that how this story ends on the upbeat.
For we are told in verse 51 that Mary treasures these things in her heart, and that by the operations of the Spirit in her. This suggestive that she becomes then the source of the distribution of this very witness, this very testimony, communicating these things out of the storehouse of her heart to Luke, the gospel writer. And that she has provided this information willingly, even though it indicts her. She incriminates herself by communicating this material to Luke. It is by this route that Mary becomes the strong and faithful figure, fulfilling a service to us that is instructive for the life of the Church as a whole.
She is diminished in the story, and seen therefore, as she now acknowledges, as in need of regeneration herself, which, when that regeneration comes, makes sense of all that she has stored up in her heart. She then knows that the child to which she gave birth, he being the very son of God, had to be completely engaged in his father’s affairs, that is, his father above his affairs, even to the point of disappearance in death, to the end that she, even she, might be saved by his death and resurrection from her ignorance, confusion, and yes, her depravity.
And if such be the case for Mary, the one whom Elizabeth earlier called the mother of my Lord, then what about your situation and your condition? You must understand how much Rome robs itself, as well as those who are adherents to her. For in failing to preach Mary as she ought to be preached, the Church is monumentally Mary in heaven now does not agree with any of the veneration directed towards her. Amen.
Truly, if such be the case for Mary, what of your situation and circumstance If Mary is led by Jesus’ true journey out of her confusion, ignorance and depravity into the regeneration of life and life, must not you also be led by that journey into true glory, now entered and enjoyed by your Savior, the Son of God? Oh Lord, that your church would hear your gospel writers inspired by the Holy Spirit. that there might then be that proper devotion, that right and appropriate piety, that marvelous and gracious carriage among your people that is an honor to you and an honor to your son. And may your church be forgiven for foolishness And even now, Lord, may you be at work in those who in their confusion have become the agents of confusion, that we all might be the children of light, walking as we should because of the great and conclusive journey of our Savior. Lord, we ask for your help. not only as we pray for ourselves, but for others, that you would multiply your praise from us.
The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

