Sermon Series: Luke’s Christmas Story

  • About My Father’s Business

    About My Father’s Business

    This sermon is from the Rev. Charles G. Dennison sermon archive, part of the “Luke’s Christmas Story” series, and was preached at Grace Orthodox Presbyterian Church in Sewickley, PA, during a worship service on Sunday, January 4, 1998.

    About this sermon

    Luke’s Gospel follows Christ’s journey from Galilee to Jerusalem, and the story of the boy Jesus in the temple already traces it. His three-day absence in 2:46 foreshadows the tomb. The story shows Mary, and us, what it means to seek him.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    Our scripture reading this morning is from Luke 2. We are reading from verse 41. Give your attention now to the Word of God. Now, his parents went to Jerusalem every year at the Feast of the Passover, and when he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the Feast.

    And when they had fulfilled the days, as they returned, the child that Jesus carried behind in Jerusalem, and Joseph and his mother knew not of it. But they, supposing him to have been in the company, went a day’s journey. and they saw him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance. And when they found him not, they turned back to Jerusalem, seeking him. And it came to pass that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them and asking them questions, and all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers. And when they saw him, they were amazed.

    And his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? Behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing. And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? know ye not that I must be about my father’s business? And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them. And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them. But his mother kept all these sayings in her heart, and Jesus increased in wisdom and stature and in favor with God and men.

    Pray with me. Hear us, O God, for the sake of your Son. His great work of redemption, His merit is our hope and our security. We would pray, O God, through His mediation in the power of the Spirit, and that, O God, with the expectation and the confidence that we are heard. We would not pray simply for ourselves, but we do pray, O God, that we might hear your word. We would pray, O God, for those who are yours throughout the world, who are already assembled under the proclamation of the word and under the ministry of the means of grace. But we are asking, O Father, that you would demonstrate again the effectiveness of those means and of the preaching of the word, even as you are pleased to call your elect yourself. Father, we would rejoice as the many are brought out of darkness into light, out of death into life. May our proclamation, O God, Contribute to this end, even in keeping with your ordination. We ask this for the sake of Jesus, our Savior, who precedes us to glory. Amen.

    It has been often pointed out that the longest single portion in Luke’s Gospel is preoccupied with Jesus’ journey from Galilee to Jerusalem. The account of that journey begins in the ninth chapter of Luke, verse 51. and reaches its goal in chapter 19, verse 28. The section, therefore, dealing with that journey, makes up, in whole or in part, eleven chapters in this gospel. From the sheer weight of the material alone, we can conclude that Luke, by the Holy Spirit, means to tell us in a very definite manner about this journey.

    The journey is a dominant, if not the dominant theme for the Gospel, therefore. But this being the case, the theme of the journey being the dominant theme. We might well then expect this theme to be reinforced in the other portions of the gospel. This is, in fact, what we do find.

    Before we are brought in this gospel to that central and conclusive journey, Luke tells us that Jesus had already made two previous journeys to Jerusalem. These two previous journeys stand close together in Luke chapter 2. and in their close proximity serve as an introduction that is a preparation for that latter greater journey. Of course, the journeys that I have in mind are those that stand side-by-side in Luke chapter 2, first verses 21 through 40, and then verses 41 through 52. The first of these passages, 21 through 40, tells us about Jesus’ journey to Jerusalem as an infant, he having been circumcised eight days after his birth. The second passage, which we have read this morning, tells us about Jesus’ journey to Jerusalem as a child at the age of twelve. The famous instance including his disappearance for three days, his parents’ search for him, and their discovery of him in the temple.

    But now, what I want you to mark about these two stories are their extraordinary similarities. One obvious tip-off that similarities are intended, that these stories have a parallel structure, is that each story ends on the same note. As you read along in Luke 2, you may have noticed it for yourself.

    Verse 40 in chapter 2 speaks about Jesus’ growth towards maturity, that at the end of the first journey story, but so does verse 52, the verse that concludes the second journey story. You will note further in these two verses that certain words are repeated. The words wisdom and grace, they are used in both verses, and in both verses we have comment made upon Jesus’ progress or increase in wisdom. The strong match for these two verses leads us into a review of both of the stories in search of other correspondences. Let me help you pick out the parallels.

    In the first story, speaking here of verses 21 through 40, In the first story, we have mention made of Jesus’ age. He is eight days, verse 21. In story number two, he is twelve years of age, verse 42. In story one, the law is specifically introduced in the rite of circumcision and in the provisions of the law for purification following the birth of a child. Verse 21, verses 22 through 24, verse 27.

    The second story introduces the law in its reference to the Feast of Passover and in its reference to the customs of the Feast, verses 41 and 42. In the second story, Inferences concerning the law are in view, particularly as Jesus has his interview before the teachers in the temple, but most specifically in verse 51, where a mention is made of the way in which Jesus subjects himself to his parents in obedience to them.

    Comment upon the Fifth Amendment. Both stories, you will note, are set explicitly at the Temple in Jerusalem. Further, both mention the fulfillment of the prescribed number of days in connection with the ceremonies in view. Next, both stories record encounters in the Temple.

    One story, the first story, the encounter between Jesus’ parents and Simeon and Anna, In story number two, the encounter between Jesus’ parents and Jesus himself, interesting juxtaposition. This, of course, against the background of Jesus’ encounter with the teachers in verse 46 in that latter story. Each story carries within it the theme of amazement, or even bewilderment. In each, Jesus’ parents are baffled, amazed, bewildered. Note verse 33 in the first story, verses 48 and 50 in the second. with the second story adding comment concerning the amazement of the preachers.

    In the Temple, verse 47. Both stories reflect implicitly further on Mary’s confusion. Story number one in Simeon’s comment about the sword that would pierce her soul due to the controversy generated by her son, verse 35. Story two, in Mary’s natural but spiritually imperceptive and limited question, verse 48.

    Story one, and also story two, Both include the theme of mystery resolved in the finding of Jesus. Simeon and Anna, those who are awaiting the consolation of Israel and the redemption of Jerusalem, find the resolution of the mystery in the presentation of the child. Joseph and Mary, clearly, have the mystery of their son’s absence resolved by the story’s end. Furthermore, both stories bear witness to Jesus’ mission.

    In the first story, Sinion lays that mission before us in his comments to Jesus’ parents, verses 29 through 32, and again specifically to Mary in verses 34 and 35. In the second story, Jesus lays that witness concerning himself before his parents in verse 49. They do not realize that he must be about his father’s affairs, his father’s business in his father’s house. Both stories mention Nazareth, the town in Galilee to which the family returned after the ceremonies in Jerusalem. And finally, as I have already stated, these stories conclude on the same note, with reference made to Jesus’ maturing and growth.

    Now, I know that that was, for some of you, quite an exercise. Maybe some of you were trying to write those down as I went through them. If I have counted all of the parallels between these two stories, and I’m not saying that I haven’t missed a few, it would seem that there were at least 11 obvious connections between them. Certainly enough for us to conclude that these stories do in fact belong together. There are certainly enough connections between these two stories to say that they are meant to be interpreted in terms of each other. But equally clear is the fact that our stories are not identical. As perfectly matched as they may be, they record different events twelve years apart. And it will be in noting the differences, not just the similarities, that will help us to understand better the intention of these stories. For one thing, and yes, most importantly, as we turn to this second journey story this morning in Luke chapter 2.

    Jesus himself now becomes the active participant. Jesus himself becomes the active participant. In the previous story, he was but a babe in arms, neither speaking nor conspicuously active in directing the course of events. However, with this latter story, Jesus now is front and center, making decisions, determining his own actions, if not the actions of others about him.

    He is making decisions that separate him, that set him over against, that separate him parents that find him in discussions and even separating himself to a degree from the temple teachers, decisions that engage him in an exchange with his parents, and decisions that lead him to submit himself to his parents as they take him back to Nazareth, their hometown. as we move from the first story to the second story, from the first journey story to the second journey story, is a picture of the incremental control that is resident in Jesus as he is even more self-consciously aware of it.

    Moving him as it does from his infant years to his teenage years. The objective of these stories, however, is hardly to provide us with the pattern for perfect child-rearing. Now, not that there might not be implications, but the objective of these stories is not to provide us with a pattern here in divine and holy scripture to provide us with a pattern for perfect child-birth. Although by verses 51 and 52, Jesus appears to be the perfect teenager, he is going home in submission to his parents. His actions, however, in the course of our second story, are hardly a model for the teen years. Jesus does indeed submit himself to the convention of the family in order that we all, in and through him, may be provided a complete and perfect obedience, extending even to our teen years. into which we might then enter.

    Such is the nature of the redemption that he provides us. But as much as this may be a point to the story, the greater point is that he is able to do this for us because he is distinct from us. Yes, he is flesh and bone. Yes, he has a human body like we do, yet he is set apart, he is distinct, he is divine. And there is that sense in which, in the literal nature of the case, we cannot, no, must not follow him. We cannot and must not follow him.

    I definitely pursued my own independence from my parents, but I don’t recall ever pleading the high level of my spiritual attainment and interest as the excuse. But even if I had developed such a high level of spiritual attainment and interest, Would I have been justified in hiding out for three days at a conference, be it even a conference on Reformed theology, without my parents’ knowledge? I don’t think so. I really don’t think so.

    Here’s the purpose, then, of this story. to encourage such independence in teenagers. It’s the purpose of this story to encourage this kind of behavior. Wander off without your parents’ knowledge, very frantically searching for you, even with sorrow. and you popping up three days later. Well, if the purpose of the story is not to encourage such behavior on the part of teenagers, what is its purpose?

    That purpose is brought to light in Jesus himself and by the overarching story of salvation in which he is the central figure. The account of Jesus’ journey at age twelve to the temple in Jerusalem draws along with it the story about his journey to the same location when he was but a babe in arms. And these stories, back to back, about earlier journeys, together move us to that conclusive journey with which this gospel will end.

    Jesus’ self-conscious separation from his parents becomes a deliberate act full of redemptive historical significance. In the interests of his coming separation, in the accomplishment of redemption, it will force his parents and others towards them. to their own self-conscious reflections.

    In the second story, then, at the end of Luke 2, in a way filled with redemptive historical significance, you will note that it is no longer Simeon and Anna’s testimony that baffles Joseph and Mary. Instead, now it is the testimony of Jesus himself. as he supersedes and displaces Simeon and Anna, as glorious as they were. He will confound his parents, but he will also confound the teachers of the law in anticipation of his exalted and unmatched supremacy. There’s no one like him.

    The mention, therefore, of the three days—and we’re waiting for this—the mention, therefore, of the three days, verse 46, becomes the clincher. It, together with the development and presentation of Jesus’ self-consciousness is in addition to the previous story. We have moved in our preparation for the great journey to the point where we are anticipating more clearly the coming crisis. In the context of and for the purpose of fulfilling of the law, speaking now with regard to that great and latter journey in the context of and for the purpose of fulfilling the law, Jesus will journey to Jerusalem where he, after fulfilling the law in his death, will be lost to Israel for three days, only to be found again by the resurrection.

    He himself, in that context, bearing testimony that baffles even those closest to himself. It is of importance in this regard to realize that, as in the story recorded in verses 21 through 40, so also here in this concluding story in Luke 2, Joseph and Mary, particularly Mary, are the foils for the truth of the gospel. In the second story, Jesus’ parents are placed in the company, you will note, of the teachers of Israel who are equally battled, and who finally, in their sinful ignorance, will crucify the Lord of Glory. Left to herself, will Mary not execute her son? Left to herself, Will she not also join the teachers from the temple to conspire in execution of her son?

    Oh, we all have that residual goodness. Mary, especially, she’d never do such a thing. If you answer that way, in terms of the gospel that Luke is presenting here, you are a fool. And you neither know the gospel, nor Mary. But most particularly, you do not know yourself. the matching of the amazement among the teachers, and then in Mary and in Joseph, but particularly in Mary, is testimony to you and an affirmation of the Pauline doctrine of the universal depravity of humanity. They have sinned and come short of the glory of God, and not even Mary is excluded. that how this story ends on the upbeat.

    For we are told in verse 51 that Mary treasures these things in her heart, and that by the operations of the Spirit in her. This suggestive that she becomes then the source of the distribution of this very witness, this very testimony, communicating these things out of the storehouse of her heart to Luke, the gospel writer. And that she has provided this information willingly, even though it indicts her. She incriminates herself by communicating this material to Luke. It is by this route that Mary becomes the strong and faithful figure, fulfilling a service to us that is instructive for the life of the Church as a whole.

    She is diminished in the story, and seen therefore, as she now acknowledges, as in need of regeneration herself, which, when that regeneration comes, makes sense of all that she has stored up in her heart. She then knows that the child to which she gave birth, he being the very son of God, had to be completely engaged in his father’s affairs, that is, his father above his affairs, even to the point of disappearance in death, to the end that she, even she, might be saved by his death and resurrection from her ignorance, confusion, and yes, her depravity.

    And if such be the case for Mary, the one whom Elizabeth earlier called the mother of my Lord, then what about your situation and your condition? You must understand how much Rome robs itself, as well as those who are adherents to her. For in failing to preach Mary as she ought to be preached, the Church is monumentally Mary in heaven now does not agree with any of the veneration directed towards her. Amen.

    Truly, if such be the case for Mary, what of your situation and circumstance If Mary is led by Jesus’ true journey out of her confusion, ignorance and depravity into the regeneration of life and life, must not you also be led by that journey into true glory, now entered and enjoyed by your Savior, the Son of God? Oh Lord, that your church would hear your gospel writers inspired by the Holy Spirit. that there might then be that proper devotion, that right and appropriate piety, that marvelous and gracious carriage among your people that is an honor to you and an honor to your son. And may your church be forgiven for foolishness And even now, Lord, may you be at work in those who in their confusion have become the agents of confusion, that we all might be the children of light, walking as we should because of the great and conclusive journey of our Savior. Lord, we ask for your help. not only as we pray for ourselves, but for others, that you would multiply your praise from us.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • Simeon and Anna

    Simeon and Anna

    This sermon is from the Rev. Charles G. Dennison sermon archive, part of the “Luke’s Christmas Story” series, and was preached at Grace Orthodox Presbyterian Church in Sewickley, PA, during a worship service on Sunday, December 28, 1997.

    About this sermon

    Simeon is a baffling figure, and in him and Anna the law and the prophets meet. Anna comes from the tribe of Asher and Simeon carries a tribe’s name, and both tribes mean something. Luke 9:23-27 shows the cost of the salvation they waited for.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    This morning we begin our scripture reading in Luke chapter 2. We are at verse 21. This is the word of God. And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name is called Jesus. which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.

    And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord. As it is written in the law of the Lord, every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord, and to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord. a pair of turtledoves and two young pigeons. And behold, there was a man in Jerusalem whose name was Simeon, and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel. And the Holy Ghost was upon him, and it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost that he should not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Christ. And he came by the Spirit into the temple.

    And when the parents brought in the child Jesus to do for him after the custom of the law, then took he him up in his arms, and blessed God, and said, Now let us, thou thy servant, depart in peace, according to thy word, for mine eyes have seen thy salvation, which thou hast prepared before the face of all people, a light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel. And Joseph and his mother marveled at those things which were spoken of him. And Simeon blessed them and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel, and for a sign which shall be spoken against. Yea, a sword shall pierce through thine own soul also, that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.

    And there was one Anna, a prophetess. the daughter of Phenuel of the tribe of Asher. She was of great age and had lived with and husband seven years from her virginity, and she was a widow of about fourscore and four years, which departed not from the temple but served God with fastings and prayers night and day. And she, coming in that instant, gave thanks likewise unto the Lord and spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem. And when they had performed all things according to the law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own city, Nazareth. And the child grew and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom, and the grace of God was upon him.”

    I’m turning over to Luke 9. reading at verse 23. And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it, but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it. For what is a man advantaged if he gain the whole world and lose himself and be cast away? For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of Man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his father’s, and of his holy angels.

    But I tell you of a truth, there be some standing here which shall not taste of death till they see the kingdom of God. Pray. Father, may your word profit us. And Lord, we would ask the same for your people around the world. And Lord, we are asking you that you would prosper your word, according to your promise. But as we have been delivered from death into life, you might be gracious to those who proclaim your word in truth today, that there may be many who are brought from death to life. Father, we ask these things in the name of Jesus Christ, the one who is dead, the one who was raised and is alive forevermore. Amen.

    Who is Simeon? Or, maybe better, what is Simeon’s meaning? This question is difficult to answer. In fact, it is as difficult as any we have addressed thus far in this series of messages from Luke’s account of Christ’s birth. Who is sinning? The difficulty of this question rises because of the many strands. we must unravel in order to understand the man.

    On the surface of things, we are told in the text that Simeon lived in Jerusalem. He was a man whose devotion and piety were molded by his hope. He was also a man in whom had come the witness of the Holy Spirit, he being informed by the Spirit that he would not see death until he had seen the Christ. He was a man who, upon beholding the child Jesus, uttered a prophetic song, verses 29 through 32, and then a prophetic oracle to Mary, verses 34 and 35.

    But in restating the obvious facts from the text, have we really answered the question Who is sinning? It is my conviction this morning that we have not. Actually, in order to understand this man, I judge we will have to deal with at least three matters, the first of which is this.

    Simeon appears in a passage that opens and closes with references to the law. Simeon appears in a passage that has been framed by references to the law. In addition to that, There are references to the law throughout the entirety of the passage in view.

    At its beginning, verse 21, Luke speaks about Jesus’ circumcision, which, according to Old Testament precedent, was carried out eight days after birth. The law is specifically mentioned in verse 22. In view are the purification rites for mothers following the birth of a child. But now, let your eyes drop down to verse 39. As this passage comes to a close, the law again is specifically mentioned.

    The text says, When they had performed everything according to the law of the Lord, they, his parents, returned to Galilee. The passage opens with mention of the law, it closes with mention of the law, and there are multiple mentions of the law throughout the text, verses 23, 24, 27, and allusions to the law at other places. It would seem, it would seem that Simeon’s significance, his identity, his meaning, is tied up with, is bound to, the theme of the law. The second thing to keep in mind for William Simeon’s significance is his relationship in the text to Anna. it would seem that they go together.

    Now, to this point in Luke’s narrative, he has presented us with two other male-female combinations. In the first chapter, we have Zacharias and Elizabeth, John the Baptist’s parents. We also have Joseph and Mary. presented to us there. Now, here in the second chapter, there comes a third pairing, Simeon and Anna.

    But Simeon and Anna are different. They are distinct even in their presentation. The first two couples mentioned are married. Simeon and Anna are not. In this distinctive feature, Simeon and Anna are being set apart. They are being set apart as distinct in their identity from the other two couples. There is even an ascendancy in view here.

    If I dare say it, Simeon and Anna, within this context, become even more important than Joseph and Mary. Yes, there will be a diminishment in the text for Joseph and Mary. Luke is being very deliberate in this. He will put Joseph and Mary in a lesser light that the Church in all succeeding generations may not exalt them unduly. The Church has no excuse. She has been told. She has been informed by the narrative. She has been informed by the apostolic testimony.

    So let’s be done with the veneration of Joseph and Mary. Sinion and Anna, therefore, are distinct in their identity. And in a true and very real sense, Mary and Joseph are closer to Elizabeth and Zacharias than to Anna and Sinion. But now, having placed these two together, Luke intends us here to read them off of each other. He means for us to read each in terms of the other. Therefore, if we are to understand Simeon, we might well look to Anna. When we look into Anna, we gain better entrance into the significance of sin. In this regard, a couple of things hit you immediately.

    The description of Anna as it is presented to you in verse 36. For one thing, she is called a prophetess. The only woman positively so identified with such a title in the New Testament. Prophecy is spoken of in connection with other women, but no other woman positively is described as a prophetess.

    Now, regardless of what we make of this title in Anna’s case, part of its intention is to direct you back to Simeon, is to help you understand Simeon, who, although he is not called a prophet, utters a prophetic song in verses 29 through 32, and offers his prophetic oracle to Mary in verses 34 and 35.

    Simeon, therefore, is seen in prophetic light, and together with Anna, he stands as a prophetic presence in the context—reaching back to pick up our first point—in the context of the law. law and prophets together. And if you are going to understand the significance of Sinion, you are going to understand the significance of the law and the prophets, what the law and the prophets have been all about. In this regard, you might remember how the Gospel of Luke concludes with Jesus on the road to Emmaus, speaking to two depressed disciples. And he expounds to them, out of the law and the prophets, his own significance, why it was necessary for the Christ to suffer in order to enter into his glory. What do we know, then, about Simeon and his significance? So far we have Simeon, a prophetic presence, standing within the context of the law. Law and prophets, then, set before us, if you will. the sum of all previous revelation. But there is another factor bearing upon Simeon’s identity that hits us in the description of Anna given in verse 36, and it is this.

    The mention of her tribe. Not only is Anna the only titled prophetess in the New Testament, she is among the few, if she is not the only woman, with a stated Jewish pedigree provided in the New Testament. Now, as strange as that is, more strange still is the fact that the tribe from which she comes, the tribe of Asher, is among the proverbial Lost Tribes, belonging to the devastated ten northern tribes of the Kingdom of Israel. that were dispersed in the 8th century B.C. How this woman’s lineage was preserved over 700 years, we are not told. But she, in this her tribe, the tribe of Asher, bears some connection to Sinion. and helps us to open up his significance further. I say that she, in her tribe, bears some connection to Simeon, because Simeon, in his name, carries a tribal tie. Do you remember the tribe of Simeon? reading us of Anna back to Simeon, we see Simeon the prophet, we see Simeon shorthand for tribe. Simeon, you will recall, was the second of Jacob’s sons. He was cursed by his father. for his sin with Levi at Shechem, and that cursing by Jacob before Jacob’s death is recorded in Genesis 49, verses 5-7. God, in this prophecy to Simeon, the tribe of Simeon, promises that Simeon will be scattered. Simeon will be scattered. Hang with me. This scattering in itself connects to Asher, who also was scattered.

    The disappearance of Simeon is a matter that presents itself later in the blessings we hear from Moses in Deuteronomy 33, this coming 400 years later than Jacob’s pronouncement. For you will notice in Deuteronomy 33, in contrast to Genesis 49, that Simeon now is omitted.

    There is no mention of him at all. He is as good as gone, even as they enter the land. But the witness isn’t done yet, for we have the matter of the distribution of the land when Joshua leads the tribes in. Do you remember that? Joshua 19, verses 1-8 speaks about the distribution to Simeon.

    And there we are told that Simeon has no distinct property. He is propertyless, in effect, for he is absorbed into Judah. There is no special territory given to Sinion. He is absorbed into Judah and thereby lost from view. Gone. Before Asher, the tribe of Asher is lost to the Assyrians along with the nine other tribes of the North in the 8th century B.C. himself a prophecy was lost into Judah in the fourteenth century B.C. Now, you might be thinking that I’ve really gone out on a limb here, that I’m really stretching this thing, I’m really grasping for this one. running from Anna’s tribal connection to Simeon’s name for the purpose of gaining better entrance into Simeon’s meaning and identity. And I’m sure that I would agree with you that this is indeed a stretch, if it weren’t after the fact, of Simeon’s spiritual condition and situation.

    You see, Simeon now is presented to you here in Luke 2 as a man who has no life, save that life directed to, absorbed into the figure of the Lord’s Christ. The only reason he continues to live in this world is to see the salvation of the Lord. Oddly, the tribe of Simeon, before this namesake in Luke 2, had no life, but that life bound up in Judah the tribe of the promised Christ. Figuratively, then, the tribe of Simeon awaits vindication, the vindication that will come through the exaltation of the son of Judah, the descendant of David.

    A manifestation, then, of the Lord’s true Messiah. And it will be by this route that Simeon, the ancient tribe, himself will be delivered. By this route, Simeon’s life and significance will come to light, both tribe and man. What we know about the tribe of Asher, Anna’s tribe, carries the point along. It also will speak to us about messianic glory, of the exceptional nature of the kingdom realized in Christ.

    Asher was eighth born to Jacob. In the blessings and cursings from Jacob in Genesis 49, Asher is ninth mentioned, but by the time you get to Deuteronomy 33 and Moses’ pronouncements, he’s dead last. In numerical order, Asher descends, becoming last. However, if you note the blessing spoken out by Moses in Deuteronomy 33, in terms of blessing, Asher ascends and becomes first. The last becomes first. For Moses says of Asher in Deuteronomy 33, Most blessed of sons is Asher. His brothers will favor him and serve him. Asher, numbered last, is exalted and made first.

    Sinion, lost in Judah, is found. Death is giving way to life, and in ways that only God can accomplish. Asher, north Simeon South, figuratively bringing together the whole of dispersed Israel, devastated by sin, humiliated and even destroyed, given over to death, now reborn, exalted, regathered in Simeon and Anna. Israel reconstituted. The utterly impossible. has happened.

    These two, Simeon and Anna, have a common life and identity. In them we see Judah and Israel, the two kingdoms reunited in their true calling, poised and ready to behold and welcome the consolation of Israel, the redemption of Jerusalem in the coming of the Messiah, Jesus Christ.

    But there is, of course, one other factor that helps us to understand Simeon’s identity, and that factor is the person of Jesus himself. For you see, This will not be Jesus only, or even his most important journey to Jerusalem and the temple. He will make yet a final journey. And it will be in relationship to Jesus’ last journey to Jerusalem that Simeon’s identity is made more clear still. For it will be in that latter journey that Jesus will come conclusively himself within the context of the law and its demands. He there, within that context, receiving the greater circumcision for the removal of the body of flesh, as Paul testifies in Colossians 2, And there he will perfect the purification from all uncleanness from sin, which the law could only anticipate but could not achieve. And there, in the context of that final journey, and as a consequence of it, he himself will be acclaimed the Lord’s Christ, and that by a unified witness of a renewed and restored Israel, as its consummate and true prophetic testimony converges on his person and upon his word.

    Simeon and Anna, therefore, do not represent the disciples in their confused state about Jesus’ ministry as they’re making their way to Jerusalem for that final confrontation. Simeon and Anna do not represent the disciples in their confused state at the crucifixion and even at the resurrection.

    Much less do Simeon and Anna represent confused but devout Israelites who may have an interest in or have an attachment to Jesus, be it even abroad, such as Joseph and Mary. No, Joseph and Mary themselves will represent all of those people. They will represent the confused and the bewildered. They’re the ones who don’t get it in the story, and they won’t get it in the next story either. when Jesus goes to the temple at age twelve. But Simeon and Anna do get it. Simeon and Anna then represent Israel restored, unified, consoled, redeemed, prophetically alert, Holy Spirit filled, as even on the day of Pentecost, it is all becoming clear.

    Before the events take place, you are seeing them pass before your eyes. You are beholding the history before it even happens. You are being given a completed story, even in sedal form, at its beginning. And Simeon, who was not to see death until he saw the Lord’s Christ, does he not anticipate Christ’s disciples at their very best state, those to whom Christ promises that they would not taste death until they see the kingdom of God? in that kingdom, which the disciples beheld even as the Spirit descended, has truly come. And in the One who stands at its center, there is a light of revelation to all the nations, to the Gentiles. The glory of the Lord’s people is real. They have no other glory than this.

    And at the same time, that kingdom has come in and with Christ, who raises and casts down many in Israel, he being a sign of those dividing families, even among the Jews, as surely as a sword of confusion and division will pierce Mary’s own soul. For by him, the thoughts of many will be revealed. And because of him, many under the law will be set against one another. and even at each other’s throats.

    Who is sin? He is the once fallen, but now raised and faithful Israel, one in whom we see Israel restored, who in the context of the law, but now filled with the Holy Spirit, the consummate blessing of God, welcomes the Christ the one for whose sake, that is, the one who has existed for Christ and for Christ’s sake alone. Who is Simeon? He is the one in whom we are even privileged to befold ourselves and the patterns of the Church in her present situation, for we await Christ’s return even as Simeon awaited his first coming. And we find our life completely and totally in him, even as Simeon found his life completely and totally in Christ. Did not the Apostle Paul say, for to me to live is Christ and to die is gain. And can you, in understanding and grasping Simeon’s significance, say anything less?

    I trust not. Oh God, there are no loose ends. You tie everything together. You bring back that which was thought lost. You raised that which was dead. And in this, O God, you provide the marvelous testimony about yourself, that there is no one like you. Truly, as we would know who Simeon is, even more, O God, we would know who you are. The father, we pray that Simeon and others in your word. Would continue to be a help to us. In knowing you. We have no life. But our God. And we have no existence. But our Savior.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • Born Outside the Land

    Born Outside the Land

    This recording is from the Rev. Charles G. Dennison archive, part of the “Luke’s Christmas Story” series, delivered December 24, 1997.

    About this sermon

    Israel’s restoration to Judea after the exile was never final, because the heavenly kingdom is final. Christ comes into the world under Caesar’s decree, in a land still under Rome’s rule. His birth carries three things with it.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    Father, it is not our joy alone, even the secret, but it is the joy of your people around the world. Dear Lord, we ask that the joy that is expressed may well in itself be a witness to your greatness and your faithfulness. Father, be pleased to use us, even the joy that we express, that we then, according to your Spirit in some small way, might be a means for you to speak powerfully to others. May it be, O God, that our joy directs others to the greatness of the redemption which has been accomplished in Christ. May our joy be well grounded in your word and direct others to that word. We pray these things now, O God, for the sake of Jesus our Savior. Amen.

    Now I have to admit that I was tempted, as I usually am, during the Christmas Eve service or in terms of my preparations for the Christmas Eve service. a nice little service on Christmas Eve, folks coming out to church, not wanting to delay too long, not wanting to think too hard, coming in for a bit of homiletical fluff before they go home and get down to business about the real matters of Christmas. As I said, I was tempted.

    Shall we have a bit of homiletical nonsense? Or should we have a good old-fashioned, mind-destructing sermon? Well, you know how that argument came out of me. If you came for a bit of homiletical fluff, please sit back. You know, maybe you can catch a little sleep. You might be here a while.

    The details with which Luke’s Christmas story opens here in chapter 2, reminiscent of an earlier time in Israel’s history. I have in mind the time of the exile. The exile you will remember was that period belonging essentially to the sixth century B.C., when Judah was overrun by the Chaldeans, by the Babylonians. A large number of Jews subsequently carried off from their homeland into captivity, into the proverbial Babylonian captivity.

    Here was one of those extraordinary periods in history when figures no less impressive than Caesar Augustus and Quirinius captured the world’s attention. They walked on the earth like gods. And it is while the Jews were still in captivity. But the Medo-Persians, you will remember, under Cyrus the Great, destroyed Babylon. Cyrus later issued the command that repatriated the Jews to their homeland.

    Thus began the so-called Restoration. When the Jews came back into Judea, and into its territories. But this restoration for the Jews was anything but perfect. For instance, it was not a permanent restoration. It wasn’t an everlasting or an eternal restoration. In other words, the Jews were being restored to a territory that could again be lost, from which they might again be exiled.

    But furthermore, and quite important for the purposes we have before us this evening, many of the Jews, upon their return to their homeland in the 6th century B.C., continued to be displaced persons. Even within their home territory, they continued to be displaced persons. In this regard, you may recall how painstakingly the law, and especially the book of Joshua, lays out the boundaries for the various tribes of Israel. You must understand that these territorial claims were as sacrosanct to the Jew as any of his religious obligations and duties. But upon the return from Babylon, the return from the captivity, many Jews for various reasons found resettlement on the family farm, so to speak. impractical, if not impossible. This then left many Jewish families far from their ancestral roots, even within the parable of the promised land.

    Families far from their ancestral roots families like those of Joseph and Mary, who presently lived in Nazareth of Galilee, when their ancestral ties were far to the south in the territory of Judah, and particularly the environs of the town of Bethlehem, the village of David. It would seem then that in a certain and in a very real sense, the exile, despite the restoration that came in the 6th century BC, for the Jews, has continued. It has continued with many families living now, even now, at great distances from their tribal inheritance.

    But what, you might ask, might be the divine purpose for this present predicament, even as the first century dawns? Why has God placed his people in such a situation as this, one in which being restored from exile, they are not restored and still remain in exile. Is not the reason for this the fact that the Lord wants his people to know that being restored to the land of Israel does not equal arriving home. Being restored to the land of Israel does not equal arriving home. It does not signal the end of the journey.

    To paraphrase the Apostle Paul, himself a Jew from the tribe of Benjamin, we could put it like this. To be at home in the land of Israel is to be absent from the Lord. of 2 Corinthians 5 verse 6. You know how the next verse goes? For we walk not by sight, but by faith. That is to say, the land of Israel never was the gold. for the people of God. Instead, God himself was the goal. Keep himself in his glorious eternal kingdom in heaven, from which there is no exile. That is the goal.

    Jews then living as displaced persons, like Joseph and Mary, as aliens and exiles, even within the land of Israel, become in themselves an eloquent sermon. Notice now how the theme intensifies and develops. here in the story that Luke gives us. For neither is the Lord’s message to Israel in the circumstances along these lines. I will overcome the incongruities and your displacement, and I will restore each one of you to your rightful and original territorial assignment. Judah for Judeans, the territory of Benjamin to Benjaminites, the land of Asher to Asher’s children, the land of Naphtali to the descendants of Naphtali. The Lord does not say that nor intend to say any such thing.

    But instead of some sort of affirmation of tribal territorial rights, the Lord himself declares his intention in this alien and exile couple, Joseph and Mary in Luke 2. But even more especially and particularly, in the child Mary carries. For you see, even when the Lord oversees and directs Mary and Joseph back to the territory of Judah, back to the regions of Bethlehem, to the territory of their ancestral rights.

    He does not allow them to stay there. Having arrived in Bethlehem just in time for Mary’s child to be born, these descendants of Judah are not allowed any permanent address In the regions of Bethlehem, Christ, you will recall, was born in a stable. Then shortly after the birth, they returned to Nazareth in Galilee.

    You see, remain exiles, because the Lord of heaven and earth, the Lord who is at work to save his people, is endeavoring to instruct them that their true home is elsewhere. But this being the case, the Lord, of course, does not leave Israel in the dark as to where that true home might be.

    We see the true home coming to life in however a preliminary way in the story of Jesus’ a story which at the same time is inclusive of Israel’s past and suggestive of the coming life of the church. What you will want to understand from all of this is this. The story of Jesus Christ’s birth carries in it the story of Israel, whose life now the Son of God willingly and consciously takes to himself thereby setting before the ancient people of God that ancient people’s true home and destiny. But this birth also carries within it the purpose to which Christ himself will press in his maturity, in the maturity of his ministry, namely his death and his resurrection, through which that true home ordained for the people of God that will be achieved. And finally, the story of Christ’s birth carries within it the story of the Church and its future, the story of all those savingly bound to the Savior, who through him are going home indeed. First of all, then, Christ’s birth carries with it the story of Israel. God, in becoming man through the incarnation, I hope you know that word, literally enters into the experience of his people, such as his love.

    If we are to see in Mary and Joseph the exile history and even its continuation, we must admit that Mary’s child has been conceived in and is born into the same circumstance. Joseph and Mary’s history has become his history, their history being a history in which we perceive the exile. It becomes a history in which he partakes. In Christ God himself lives through the exodus. Such is the vicarious nature of his identity. He takes it to himself, to the end that in himself he might deliver his people from exile and bring them to their true home.

    How God will accomplish this brings us to our second point. Christ’s birth carries within it testimony to the purpose to which our Savior presses in his mature ministry. In fact, we can see in the birth the pattern of the whole of Christ’s life. That pattern, the whole of it, before Christ lives it. It is there in infant form.

    For just as the Son of God comes down from heaven to earth and will return there, so he comes in his mother’s womb from the north country of Galilee to be born in Bethlehem and visit Jerusalem, then to depart again for Galilee. Similarly, just as he, Christ, as a child, travels south to Judah and Jerusalem, and while yet in Mary’s womb, there in his mother, to suffer rejection, there was no room for him in the inn. only to be born to angelic acclamation, and then to depart northward again. So as a man in his full maturity, he will journey south from Galilee to Judah and Jerusalem, and while yet in his flesh there suffer rejection and death, only to be born again in resurrection to angelic acclamation, then to depart into the regions of glory.”

    It is obvious, is it not? The pattern is divinely inspired, divinely appointed. The parallel is perfect. God moves us then in the story about the birth of his Son to the story about the death of his Son. I said it before, I will say it again. There is deliberate movement in the gospel as we move from the womb to the tomb.

    You may not have noticed it, but that is why Luke, in chapter 23, verse 53, tells us that the tomb into which Christ’s dead body was laid was one in which no man had ever lain. We move from the virgin womb to the virgin tomb. The angelic messengers at the tomb to the women match the angel messengers in the field near Bethlehem, speaking to the shepherds. The sign of the empty tomb, with its linen wrappings upon Jesus’ resurrection, matched the sign of the manger and the swaddling clothes at Jesus’ birth. And David, Jesus’ departure from Judah to the north into Galilee, anticipates his departure into heaven, the true home for all God’s exiles who live as strangers and aliens in this world.

    This brings us to our third and final point. The story of Jesus’ birth carries within it the story of the Church taking shape. We see that story of the Church in the angels and in the shepherds. The angels themselves are the pattern for the coming ministry of the Church.

    They bear witness to Jesus Christ. A witness that leads to a superlative worship of God and his benediction upon his people. The shepherds follow suit. Beholding what God has done, we are told, they made known what had been told them about the And then we are informed of their worship of God. The pattern is the same. But now notice the pattern of the gospel conclusion.

    For there we find angels telling women, and women telling apostles. And there is in Christ himself. Later, telling those apostles that they would be his witnesses. Even throughout the world. Concerning the message of the kingdom. And the truth about forgiveness of sin.

    And you might note how the Gospel of Luke concludes with a scene of the apostles then at worship, even worshiping Christ, and celebrating God’s great glory, expressing the peace that has come to them. What peace? Doesn’t God want it? What peace? The apostles know better, as do we. True peace, not as the world does. but as God himself is capable of doing.

    With the combination then of the close of the Gospel of Luke with its beginning, and the regularity of the pattern of witness and worship that you see there, we cannot but conclude that here is set before us the life of the Church in witness and in worship. For she is to bear witness to and worship, not just the virginally conceived and virginally born Son of God, but the bodily crucified, risen and ascended Lord. Furthermore, by this one Lord and Savior, we his church now have our praise perfected, even unto highest heaven, with the knowledge that although we are still aliens and strangers in this world, as Peter tells us at the opening of his first letter, although we are the true twelve tribes scattered abroad, as James tells us at the beginning of his epistle, although we are the exiles, we are those with whom God is pleased by virtue of his grace and not on the basis of our righteousness. We are the recipients of an eternal peace, a gift from him that comes to us from our true home in heaven, that place into which Christ has gone and into which we most certainly I am reminded of John Calvin’s great line in this regard.

    If heaven is our home, what is earth but a place of exile? The Jews, in returning from the exile, had not come home yet. But all those believing in the virgin-born Son of God, the one who was crucified for sinners and raised again on the third day of his body, being ascended into heaven, all those savingly trusting in him, all those exiles here are on their way home. and have as a down payment upon their arrival there the peace of God already. You don’t have to be afraid if you are in exile. under the banner of Christ.

    At this Christmas season, may we all be certain that we are among the exiles. What love, O God, that you would come to us, that you would know our lives intimately as you have, that you would take the history of your people to yourself. that you would take to yourself their burden and even their sin, that you would bear that sin upon us, that you would bury it in the tomb, that you would rise again and by that resurrection grant life eternal to your people who are exiles still in this world. Father, may we know ourselves to be exiles. May we confess with all our heart that our home is in glory. And may we live, O God, in keeping with the peace of the gospel, in an obedience to your will, even until you are pleased to take us to war. And Father, until that day arrives, we pray that your church worldwide would witness faithfully to Christ and worship the one true God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Yes, we ask, Father, that there might be a faithfulness in us in our journey, even as there has been that faithfulness.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • His Name Is John

    His Name Is John

    This sermon is from the Rev. Charles G. Dennison sermon archive, part of the “Luke’s Christmas Story” series, and was preached at Grace Orthodox Presbyterian Church in Sewickley, PA, during a worship service on Sunday, December 21, 1997.

    About this sermon

    Zacharias and Elizabeth stand for Israel, and Luke 1:57-80 falls into four parts. Naming the child John breaks with family custom, as the old gives way to the new. God opens Zacharias’s mouth and he sings, and 1:80 shows the law serving the gospel.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    This morning our scripture is in Luke 1 at verse 57. We begin our reading at verse 57. This is the Word of God, Luke 1, verse 57 and following. Now, Elizabeth’s full time came that she should be delivered, and she brought forth a son. and her neighbors and her cousins heard how the Lord had showed great mercy upon her, and they rejoiced with her.

    And it came to pass that on the eighth day they came to circumcise the child, and they called him Zacharias, after the name of his father. And his mother answered and said, Not so, but he shall be called John. And they said unto her, There is none in thy kindred that is called by this name. They made signs to his father, how he would have him called. And he asked for a writing table and wrote, saying, His name is John.

    And they marveled all. And his mouth was opened immediately, and his tongue loosed. And he spake and praised God, and fear came on all that dwelt round about them, and all these sayings were noised abroad throughout all the hill country of Judea, and all that heard them laid them up in their hearts, saying, What manner of child shall this be? And the hand of the Lord was with him.

    And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Ghost, and prophesied, saying, Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, for he hath visited and redeemed his people. and has raised up a horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David, as he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began, that we should be saved from our enemies and from the hand of all that hate us, to perform the mercy promised to our fathers and to remember his holy covenant, the oath which he swore to our father Abraham, that he would grant unto us that we, being delivered out of the hand of our enemies, might serve him without fear in holiness and righteousness before him all the days of our life. And thou, child, shalt be called the prophet of the highest, for thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to prepare his ways, to give knowledge of salvation unto his people by the remission of their sins, through the tender mercy of our God, whereby the dayspring from on high hath visited us.” to give light to them that sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace. And the child grew and waxed strong in spirit and was in the deserts till the day of his showing unto Israel.”

    The first of Luke’s Christmas carols is Mary’s Song, verses 46 through 55 in chapter 1 of Luke, traditionally known as the Magnificat because of the first word in the Latin version of this song. The second of Luke’s carols is Zacharias’ song, found in verses 68 through 79, commonly known as the Benedictus. Again, for the same reason, Benedictus being the first word in the Latin version of this This song by Zacharias appears in a text made up of four sections.

    First, Elizabeth’s deliverance through the birth of her son and the subsequent celebration, verses 57 and 58. Secondly, the circumcision and naming of the child, verses 59 through 63. Then, Zacharias’ healing, the people’s response, and his own prophetic praise, verses 64 through 79, and finally, the child’s life as he moves into maturity and toward his ministry, verse 80.

    Now, there are two things I want you to keep in mind as we begin this message this morning. First of all, I want you to notice the parallel between the account of John’s birth in chapter 1 and Jesus’ birth in chapter 2. Both accounts follow the same line and development. First, the birth and dependent praise. Next, the circumcision and the naming. Then, the prophetic praise, even prophecy. uttered accompanying the child’s presentation, and finally, the child’s early life and growth. You might note in this regard the parallel between chapter 1, verse 80, and chapter 2, verse 40.

    These accounts, then, are deliberately structured. They have a parallel that is deliberately presented to you. You ought to see that parallel and to profit from the parallel as you move from one chapter to the next. Now, I won’t say any more to you this morning about this parallel, except this.

    Jesus has as his forerunner John. John is the forerunner to Jesus in more than later ministry. John is the forerunner to Jesus. He is the forerunner in the totality of his life. What this means is that we are to see, then, the figure of Jesus Christ himself, that one whose way John prepares, that one for whom John is the forerunner.

    Even in the story about John’s birth. As you read the story or hear the story of John’s birth, you are to see beyond John to the one to whom John points. Remember then, the story of John’s birth serves Christ. Now, the second thing I want you to keep in mind as we begin this message this morning is this. This story about John’s birth plays well, fits well, into the overall design of Luke’s writings.

    Very much at the center of Luke’s writings is the theme of the temple and service at the temple. You might remember Luke’s gospel begins its narrative with a scene in the temple, the very beginning of Luke chapter 1, but it also ends in chapter 24 with a scene in the temple. Luke’s gospel begins in the temple and it ends in the temple. The temple also plays a very prominent role in the book of Acts, the other writing by Luke, as Acts builds towards that remarkable climax in chapter 21, verse 30, where we are told that Paul, the apostle of Jesus Christ, the apostle of the gospel, was dragged from the temple and then, immediately, the doors to the temple were shut. You might want to add your own exclamation point. The doors of the temple now are permanently shut against the gospel and against the gospel’s the gospel’s apostle.

    Zacharias is a priest serving in the temple. Zacharias is a priest serving in the old temple, in the old administration. John, his son, is a Levite. He is a priest also. and his service will be understood within the context of the priesthood. He is that Levite who prepares God’s people for service, not in the old temple, but in a new and final temple which God is bringing and establishing. Knowing this will be helpful for you in understanding the story of John’s birth. We begin with verses 57 and 58 in Luke 1. You remember the events leading up to these verses.

    Elizabeth, the barren, elderly wife of Zacharias, the priest, has conceived a child miraculously in her old age. And although righteous in the sight of God, walking blamelessly in all the commandments and requirements of the Lord—chapter 1, verse 6—Elizabeth, with her husband Zacharias, had been unable to generate a child. And despite their righteousness, which is underscored in Lutz’s account, the announcement concerning their baby’s conception even elicits an unbelieving response from the baby’s father. Zacharias, who was struck dumb by the angel Gabriel in judgment for his unbelief. And then Elizabeth, at the realization of her conception, again, despite her righteousness, secludes herself in shame and speaks out rudely, even blasphemously, about the Lord’s mercy.

    It is after Mary has come to visit Elizabeth in her sixth month that Elizabeth undergoes a great change, a transformation. In this transformation, we can see the form and pattern of the change that is coming to Israel, but also the transformation of regeneration.

    Elizabeth now births her child to her own great joy and to the great joy of her family The meaning of all this has nothing to do with the hope of a faithful but barren woman. It has nothing to do with the hope that a faithful but barren woman may carry with her into her old age, like Elizabeth, hoping, yes, against hope, that she might yet have a child. You will recall that Elizabeth was not especially thrilled about learning of her pregnancy. Much rather, Elizabeth’s story has its meaning in its relationship to the story of salvation and God’s great overarching plan of redemption.

    Therefore, in Elizabeth we see Israel itself. which, for all of its righteousness before the law, cannot deliver itself, nor in itself even respond appropriately to that deliverance when it comes. It can’t generate salvation, but it can’t even respond appropriately to that salvation when it comes back to itself. Israel, like Elizabeth and Zacharias, her husband for that matter, proves itself faithless if not contemptuous of the Lord’s dealings. and his purpose of salvation. It has no real interest in the law’s plan and purpose for salvation.

    It has, instead, every interest in its own personal position and its own personal problems. I’m a barren woman. That’s the important thing here. The important thing isn’t what God is going to do with the world, the important thing is me and what happens to me. Israel, even at its best, cannot bring salvation, nor in itself can it receive the salvation that the Lord sends. It is plain, then, is it not?

    Hope does not rest in or with Israel any more than it rests in or with Elizabeth. Hope rests alone in God, who, according to his eternal counsel, according to the purposes of his own will, performs the impossible in sending salvation and in changing hearts to receive his salvation. be they even the hearts of those who, like Elizabeth, had been much more content living comfortably within the provisions of the law, satisfied within that context. But the law’s very purpose is to greet the gospel, just as Elizabeth Davy, from the womb the voice of Mary, the one who carries the gospel in her own womb in the person of Jesus Christ. Israel is led by Elizabeth’s baby, even as Elizabeth herself has been led to receive the gospel. And when the word salvation, having come full term, is delivered, there is great rejoicing for many. just as there was among Elizabeth’s neighbors and relatives. But as the story of Elizabeth is now drawing to a close, as is Israel’s story in her, we turn to Zacharias for the purpose of completing his story. We begin with verses 59 through 63 in the account of John’s circumcision and his naming.

    Zacharias is still dumb. He cannot speak. In that condition, he attends his son’s circumcision, which, according to traditions based upon Old Testament precedent, was to occur on the eighth day after birth. and in a ceremony attended by at least ten witnesses. But when those performing the rite, or those simply attending it, were determined to call this boy, Zacharias, after his father, Elizabeth objects and demands that the child be called John. Those present object in reply. protesting that the name John appears nowhere in the family register, in the family tree. They then appeal to Zacharias. Apparently, the mother’s wish in this case is not conclusive. Zacharias beckons for a tablet and writes, to the astonishment of the assembled gathering, his name is John, verse 63. what is going on in this account.

    Here we are watching the transition from the old order to the new, in a new frame, with a new frame of reference. So we move from Elizabeth to Zacharias, as this new order is brought about by God himself. The old order is seen in the ceremony of circumcision itself, to which John is subjected. The old order is also seen in those gathered for the event, those who in time insist upon the naming of the child, Zacharias. The new is seen in John, in John the child, as acknowledged by Zacharias and Elizabeth. Their determination to name the child John indicates their determination to bow before the angel Gabriel’s directive, a directive by which the coming of the new administration, the new order, was announced.

    In fact, a directive by which the gospel had been announced. Verse 19, the angel Gabriel speaks about the good news. that has come to Zacharias. For them, then, his parents, to name this child after the father, to name this child Zacharias, would be a rejection of the revelation that had been given to them.

    But it would also be a symbolic perpetuation of the old order under the crippling handicap signaled in the liability of Zacharias’ own disbelief. Naming the child John signals the appropriate break with the past and the embrace of the new. The name John itself underscores this.

    It means Jehovah’s gift, emphasizing God’s grace to hopeless and helpless Israel. which even through the law could not make itself good enough to save itself in its condition. Whatever else the unified testimony from Zacharias and Elizabeth about the name is intended to tell us, it is meant to tell us this much. God brings out of Israel a common confession by his mercy, by his grace, a common confession of the new with regard to the new order when the new arrives.

    This confession is the only confession to which the old order, the older administration, even in its laws and legal sanctions and codes, was predestined. It was not for the perpetuation of the State of Israel. It was not for the sake of putting before you laws and statutes by which you might then construct the perfect society. It was not put in front of you so that you could create a perfect world here.

    Zacharias and Elizabeth represent the old order, particularly in its Levitical and legal identity. Their confession of the grace of God in the naming of their child reveals the transition from the old order, they themselves making this confession, to the new upon the arrival of the gospel.

    The astonishment of those gathered mentioned in verse 63 has nothing to do with the miraculous character of what is going on in the naming of the child, as if Zacharias and Elizabeth hadn’t talked to one another, hadn’t conferred with one another about this beforehand, as if somehow, miraculously, because the man couldn’t talk, he couldn’t communicate with his wife, didn’t know what name she had in mind, she didn’t know what name he had in mind. Believe it or not, that’s the way the commentators approach this text. The astonishment of those gathered here, mentioned in verse 63, has nothing to do with some supposed miraculous transition going on between Elizabeth and Zacharias in the agreement upon the name.

    Instead, it has everything to do with the absolute befuddlement and belittlement of the assembly that has been gathered here at the circumcision rite and serenity. Likewise, even as there has been rejoicing over the birth of John, there is also confusion and befuddlement amongst those who are clinging to the law and its order, clinging to their traditions. And they will be continually baffled by the new, as the new makes its appearance and grandly declares its presence in the dawning of the kingdom in the ministry of Christ.

    This brings us to verses 64-79, Zechariah’s healing, the people’s response, and Zechariah’s song of prophetic praise. Very quickly, Zechariah’s healing, verse 64, has its meaning in this. The law is given its true voice in the interests of blessing the gospel. The voice of the law is restored for the purpose of blessing the gospel. Gospel does not, you see, serve law in this redemptive historical sense. Law serves gospel. Zacharias’ voice is restored that he might now speak as one representative of the law but his voice is restored in the interests of blessing the gospel.

    What about the people’s fear and their questions, verses 65 and 66? These reactions anticipate the response throughout Judea concerning the gospel events coming Yes, as they are inaugurated and are seen in John, but much more so in the life and ministry of Jesus Christ, the child more significant than John still. We have then, in verses 68 and following, Zacharias’ song, filled with the Holy Spirit, to the intent that he might praise. reaching out beyond himself into the age of the gospel, that he might participate in the blessing of the coming of the Spirit. His song divides into two parts, verses 68-75 and then 76-79. In verses 68-75, we find a celebration to the Lord because There has been the commencement of the day of salvation in the birth of John, which Zacharias now, according to the Spirit, precedes.

    He is speaking in the most grandiose terms as if the complete accomplishment of that salvation for which he and Israel awaited has now become a genuine reality. You will note that the man praises his words. He gives us his verbs in the past tense. The Lord has visited us.

    He has already accomplished redemption for his people, verse 68. He has already raised up the horn of his salvation, verse 69. Here in what is taking place in the birth of John is the fulfillment of the promise to David, verse 69. The oath to Abraham, verse 73. Here is the satisfaction of God’s holy ancient covenant, verse 72.

    In verses 76-79, Zechariah speaks specifically about his son now, and recognizes in him that great latter-day prophet whose ministry fulfills the promises from Malachi, the last of the canonical prophets, concerning the one who precedes the Lord, preparing his way for entrance—yes, his entrance, but also the entrance of his people into the last and lasting temple. and that specifically through the forgiveness of sins.

    The consummate administration has come. John’s ministry prepares a people who will serve the Lord without fear in holiness and righteousness all their days. Priest language, verses 74 and 75, even as their feet are guided into the way of peace Verse 79, priest language again, Zechariah’s psalm, is the priesthood, the law, the old temple order, blessing the gospel, which has begun its marvelous work in John’s presentation. A presentation in which we perceive the very fullness of Christ, who comes after. This brings us to the end, verse 80. If, in verses 64-79, the law blesses the gospel, in verse 80, the law serves the gospel. In John, now, the entire legal order and its priestly structure are placed at the disposal of the gospel.

    The wilderness setting here for him in his early years and later for his ministry, answer to the prophecy that God himself is coming out of the wilderness, and that his people must return to him in the wilderness there to greet him for the consummate exodus experience. This consummate exodus wilderness experience has as its objective a people for entrance into God’s final temple, his everlasting dwelling place.

    No temple of this creation, no building or structure in this earth. The fact that the wilderness in view here is actually the Judean wilderness, think of It is the Judean wilderness, meaning that Judea herself has become a wilderness, a place of pilgrimage, not a place of final resting. The sanctuary for which John prepares us gradually makes itself plain. and effectively so. As I have said, this is no structure of this creation, but it belongs to the heavens.

    And if we were to relate it to John’s ministry of baptism, it goes like this. Beyond even the waters above the earth, Beyond even the waters above the earth, there is the sanctuary and habitation of God prepared for his elect. To get to him, you have to go through the waters that are above the earth. And the symbolism of your baptism here, when you are baptized by water, is indicative of your passage through those transcendent waters into the very presence of God. John’s ministry at the Jordan is in the interests of the consummate baptism, you passing through waters you do not see into the very presence of God.

    It is this which has been your blessing in the gospel administration. No longer in a preparatory stage, but in its grand and glorious reality. You make a wonderful beneficiary of the gospel, of the new administration that has come. That newness being of a peace of eternity and glory.

    Your baptism, even with water, as you move from John’s baptism to your own, being a sign and seal unto you that you have been privileged, now by faith, to pass through the transcendent waters, even those waters which are above the earth, into the very presence of God. This is the value of the gospel to you. This is the significance of John’s birth, and it prepares you for the meaning and intention of Christ’s.

    Now, above all, when such things have been given to you, Don’t hold on to the old. Even though it extends to you all kinds of visible securities, let it go. and pledge your life in the interests of those things that are not seen, that are eternal in the heavens, where Christ himself, your unseen Lord, sits serene at his Father’s right hand.

    We thank you, our Father, for the beauty of your word and the power of its instruction. O Father, deliver us from that attitude of mind that finds the imperatives only in the imperative sections of the scriptures. Rather, O God, may we be molded and shaped, even commanded and directed by the narratives that are before us, what we find. in the Gospels as we are told the stories of Jesus’ birth and ministry, even as that is the consequence of the undergirding and underpinning ministry of John the Baptist. May we learn, O Lord, effectively these lessons, that we would not be left without the proper imperatives that are ministered to us by your Spirit in the whole

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • My Soul Doth Magnify the Lord

    My Soul Doth Magnify the Lord

    This sermon is from the Rev. Charles G. Dennison sermon archive, part of the “Luke’s Christmas Story” series, and was preached at Grace Orthodox Presbyterian Church in Sewickley, PA, during a worship service on Sunday, December 14, 1997.

    About this sermon

    Elizabeth is Israel in her glory and her shame at once. Luke 1:39-56 moves in four stages: Mary’s journey, her reception, her song, and her service to Elizabeth. In Mary’s song the New Testament overtakes the Old.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    Luke chapter 1, we are at verse 39. This is Luke 1, verse 39. Give your attention to the Word of God. And Mary arose in those days and went into the hill country with haste into a city of Judah, and entered into the house of Zacharias and saluted Elizabeth.

    And it came to pass that when Elizabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost. And she spake out with a loud voice and said, Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? For lo, as soon as the voice of thy salutation sounded in mine ear as the babe leaped in my womb for joy.

    And blessed is she that believed, for there shall be a performance of those things which were told her from the Lord. And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord, and my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour, for he hath regarded the lowest state of his handmaiden For behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. For he that is mighty hath done to me great things, and holy is his name.

    And his mercy is on them that fear him from generation to generation. He hath showed his strength with his arm. He hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. He hath put down the mighty from their seats and exalted them of low degree. He hath filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he hath sent empty away. He hath opened his servant Israel in remembrance of his mercy, as he spake to our fathers, to Abraham and to his sea forever.

    And Mary abode with her about three months, and returned to her own house. Our text this morning progresses in four stages. First of all, Mary’s journey and greeting, verses 39 and 40. Then her reception, verses 41 through 45. Her song, verses 46 through 55, and finally her sojourn and return home, verse 56. Now, obviously, Mary stands front and center to this text. Even more so does the child she carries, our Savior Jesus Christ. However, the one we will have to come to grips with, if we are to understand this passage best, is Elizabeth.

    Who is Elizabeth? Well, of course, Elizabeth is the barren wife of Zacharias the priest, the Levite. Elizabeth has just conceived in her old age a child, no less a figure than John the Baptist, the forerunner to the Messiah. But is that all Elizabeth is, the wife of Zacharias, the mother of John, John the Baptist? Can we see in her more than a woman visited by a miracle, be it even as extraordinary a miracle as this one responsible for the conception of John the Baptist? we do see more in Elizabeth.

    If you are to understand our text in the best way, you must see that Elizabeth is Israel. She is the people as a whole, the nation as a whole. Specifically, she is Israel positively considered, living proximate in Judah to God’s promises to David, within reach of and devoted to Jerusalem, bound in her husband to the service that God has prescribed for his sanctuary in the temple. In short, Elizabeth is an extension of her husband, Zacharias. In short, Elizabeth is Israel, described together with her husband as those righteous in the sight of God, walking uprightly in all the commandments and requirements of the Lord, verse 6 in Luke 1.

    But as positively as we might see Elizabeth and her husband, for that matter, as much as we might see Elizabeth in this positive light and in relationship to Israel, she at the same time sets before us Israel subject to limitation and, yes, even corruption. Elizabeth, like Israel, is aged and barren. and not even her observation of the law, not even her righteousness which is according to the law, will deliver her from her barrenness, from her condition. And Elizabeth, like Israel, is also being bound to her husband, an extension of the Levitical system, but also inclusive of Levitical unbelief. as Zacharias, her husband, failed to believe the angel Gabriel in his message to him. And Elizabeth, like Israel, is caught, is caught despite her best intentions in a bitter dissatisfaction over God’s ways and means. Her response to God’s action, to this conception that has come to her in her old age, is to seclude herself, to hide herself away in shame, and then to explain, this is the way the Lord deals with me. Both Israel’s best and Israel’s tragic failure, therefore, reside simultaneously in Elizabeth. Her best cannot save her, her failure condemns her. that God has worked in her and for her as he does for old Israel.

    And in her, he has established hope. By his work, John is conceived in her womb. And even in the womb, this child, this child will be effectual in ministry. even as a fetus in the womb, this child will move Elizabeth, his mother, just as he will then lead through Israel later, by the grace of God, into repentance and into faith in the coming of the Son. It is in this context, within this frame of reference, that we are to understand the various stages of the text we have before us this morning. First of all, Mary’s journey and her greeting, verses 39 and 40.

    Mary is no less the figure for the new than Elizabeth is the figure for the old. Mary is no less the figure for the new than Elizabeth is the figure for the old. It is underscored in her physically. She is a virgin she is young. In contrast to Elizabeth in her age, Mary’s pregnancy now by the Holy Spirit speaks of further and even greater fruitfulness. Yes, we may speak of that spiritually, but think of it even physically.

    Mary will yet bear other children, and this in contrast to Elizabeth who receives one child to resolve her bareness, and then no more. Mary carries within her the Son of God, and she, in her person, represents those bound to him, those in whom he comes to live.

    If Elizabeth is the Old Testament, Mary is the New. If Elizabeth is Old Israel, Mary is New Israel, aligned in her meaning with the Church itself. But while Mary is the New, aligned with the Church, and here is the point. she is vitally bound to, she is vitally connected to. No. Mary herself is a Jew.

    She is engaged to Joseph, a descendant of David, and the angel has described her as a cousin or a relative to Elizabeth, verse 36. Mary may reside in Galilee, outside her ancestral territory of Judah, in a region alien to Judah and Jerusalem, but both she and the child she carries find their destinies bound to Judah and Jerusalem. In fact, Mary’s journey to Judah with Jesus in the womb is but prelude for the later journey ending at the tomb. Now, you ought to be able to remember that, because it rhymes. What is happening here with regard to the womb anticipates what’s coming at the tomb.

    Notice now further that Mary, upon her arrival at Elizabeth’s home, or the home of Zacharias the Levite, the home of the law, if you will, that upon arrival Mary greets or salutes Elizabeth. We have already said Elizabeth is the Old Order of Israel, particularly associated with the Law. Mary’s greeting is a greeting from the New. In other words, the New Testament, the New Order, is greeting the Old. The Church, if you will, is greeting Israel when Mary greets Elizabeth. The gospel is greeting the law.

    Now, I trust that it is not difficult for you to see the significance of all of this. Mary, in greeting Elizabeth, speaks to us about the Church’s continuing attitude towards the Old Testament. to the older order, toward the law, toward Israel itself. The Church must always acknowledge her connection to all that has gone before her in the plan and history of salvation. She must always acknowledge. Her love for the Old Testament, yes, for the Old Testament, for the law of God, and for Israel, who as a people prepared the way for the new.

    Don’t go through life with half a Bible. and go to that church that encourages you to do just that. The church must not then embrace a contempt for the Old Testament, a disdain, a disinterest, as many have proposed, who have claimed to speak for the church. But neither can the Church justify an antinomianism, that is, an anti-law attitude, an anti-Moses attitude, as if the law had not been given by God to Moses on Sinai. At the same time, the Church must not gouge out her eyes when it comes to the Old Testament.

    Instead, it is imperative that she openly confirmed her dependence upon Israel and Israel’s history. Paul will go so far in 1 Corinthians 10 to tell these Gentile Christians gathered that the Jews in the Old Testament were their fathers. Mary was a guest in old Israel’s house, and so are we, the Church. Remember, not just Mary, but Jesus was a Jew. and no amount of racist banter, be it white or black, can change that fact.

    But if the new greets the old in Mary’s greeting of Elizabeth, then secondly, the old, by the grace of God, receives the new as Elizabeth receives Mary. Nothing less is in view here other than Israel graciously led to embrace the gospel. Elizabeth, left in herself, left to herself, will not, cannot receive the gospel. Her self-imposed seclusion, verse 24, and her residual bitterness, verse 25, are not expressions of gratitude and joy for the role that she now plays in the plan of salvation. Change comes for her through Mary’s grieving, and through the leap of the babe within her own womb.

    Just as change will come for many in Israel through John’s preaching later and through his announcement of the Messiah, John’s later joy will be to hear the Christ’s voice as the best man rejoices at the voice of the bridegroom. That here, even now, before the ministry of either John or Jesus commences, even here, before John will publicly explode with his joy over Jesus, he leaps in the womb. John’s leap proves the old is not hostile to the new. We have seen that the new greets the old, but the old is not hostile to the new, but rather the new is the fulfillment of the old, the old welcoming the new. even confessing the new to be the superior and superlative administration, the very goal for which the old existed.

    John’s joy then translates into a transformation for Elizabeth, as if you are witnessing here a conversion. The movement from old into new, she is filled with the Holy Spirit, and her mouth overflows with blessing. Formerly she was filled with rancor and sarcasm, if not cynicism. Now she is filled with the Holy Spirit and with thanksgiving. Indeed, Elizabeth anticipates the transformation in store, so all the elect in Israel, who through the witness of John and then the preaching of Christ, are led to the glorious for the day of Pentecost and the fullness of the Spirit, together with all the blessings of the kingdom of God. Elizabeth’s blessing of Mary and her blessing of the fruit of Mary’s womb, verse 42, is the blessing generated graciously by God in which the law and the prophets of Israel, the old administration, glory in the Messiah and in the gospel of the Church. Here is Israel’s true delight, here is her true destiny and goal. But here also is her confession of genuine, abject humility, in which the old order now, through Elizabeth, declares its subordination to the new.

    For Elizabeth explains, how has it happened to me? How has it happened to me? I’m an Israelite. I’m a Jewish woman, why wouldn’t it happen to me? How has it happened to me? How has it happened to Israel, that the mother of my Lord, that is, the Church, the fullness of all my expectations, should come to me?

    She asks this question especially in light of the superlative righteousness, even that righteousness which is by faith. Yes, there is the doctrine of justification by faith, even in the first chapter of Luke. She asks this question especially in light of the superlative righteousness, the righteousness which is by faith, demonstrated by Mary, by the Church, who, unlike Elizabeth, believed what was told her by the angel.” that if the old in Elizabeth acknowledges the superlative and even superior character of the new, and even announces her subordination to it in the third place and in Mary’s song, Mary now, as the new, exhibits her own genuine humility. by subordinating herself to the old. You see what’s happening in Mary’s song. Do you catch it? Do you catch the tone? Does it register?

    Now, to be sure, we have in Mary’s song grand testimony to the superlative, superior character of the New and the subordination of the Old to the New. For example, in Mary’s song we find four explicit citations of Hannah’s song from the Old Testament, recorded in 1 Samuel 2.

    Both Mary’s and Hannah’s songs begin on the same note. My soul magnifies the Lord, or exults in the Lord. Both songs celebrate the event of the coming of the kingdom. Hannah’s song celebrates the kingdom coming in David’s reign. Mary’s song celebrates the coming of the kingdom in Christ’s reign. Mary’s citation of Hannah’s song Honor the connection between the two mighty acts of God that Mary’s song celebrates the conclusiveness of God’s action now in the coming of Christ. David’s reign is but a mere shadow. Christ’s reign is real. It is the final thing.

    Along these lines, Mary’s song evidences the superiority and superior character of the new and the subordination of the old in its use of Old Testament quotations and allusions. Over thirty different texts are cited in the Course of Mary’s Song. Over thirty, drawn from the Law, the Prophets, and the Old Testament writings. The effect of this massive yet magnificently compressed compendium of Old Testament revelation is to suggest that the whole of the Old Testament is not only fulfilled in the New, but interpreted by the New. The latter act interprets the former. Mary gathers all these Old Testament references in the interests of demonstrating that the Old Testament’s final interpretation is found as it is subjected to the light of God’s conclusive act in Jesus Christ and in his gospel.

    But having said that, the subordination of the old to the new. One more time. Truly, the wonderful thing is this. As much as Mary’s song testifies to this superlative superior character of the new, Mary’s song, although representative of the new, carries the tone, the color, and the language of the old.

    The relationship to the Hannah story and the thirty-plus citations from the Old Testament, evidence the servant character of the new, even as it subordinates itself to the old, even as it becomes like the old. Jesus, the embodiment of the new, becomes himself the servant to the old, that he might fulfill the old and save those in bondage under the old. Later, the Apostle Paul, in the spirit of Mary’s song and in the spirit of Jesus Christ, will say, To the Jew I become a Jew, so that I might win the Jews. To those who are under the law, as under the law there not being myself under the law, so that I might win those who are under the law.

    1 Corinthians 9.20.

    Mary’s song, therefore, caps the theme of humility woven throughout the text, not only will the old subordinate itself to the new, but the new humbles itself and subordinates itself to the old. And all of this, mind you, is grounded in God himself. will humble himself for the sake of the redemption that he is accomplishing. This humility in God shows itself in Mary’s song itself.

    It is seen as you watch the development of the song and the progression in it. The specific titles and names for the Lord at the beginning of the song will disappear by the end. will not appear. Instead, the name Israel and Abraham appears. Mary, in her song, captures the condescension of God. where it would seem as if God moves out of the way for the sake of his people whom he intends to exalt.

    The Lord becomes the servant for his people. By this humility and servanthood in God, we see also the playing out of that which is at work in the Incarnation. God most clearly taking to himself in that Incarnation human flesh to be born of a woman. But finally, Mary’s story and service to Elizabeth through her own humility is described to us in terms of a three-month stay, verse 56. In the final analysis, this stay and service by Mary for Elizabeth, this subordination of Mary to Elizabeth, speaks to us of God’s humiliation in Christ for us, in order to minister as he does during the course of his service. For he will minister to Israel, not for three months, but for three years, and then he will subordinate himself to death for three days. only to rise and return to his home, not to Galilee, but to glory. That place to which we all shall be brought, if we have that faith, when our days of service in a self-chosen subservience and subordination are ended in this world.

    And may the Lord Jesus Christ, in whom your own service has been perfected, bless you in your journey home. O Father, may your Church stand strong in her witness to the coalescence of the Testaments in your Word, and how each Testament serves the other, but in the interests of the exaltation of the latter. May we be trained in our souls even as we observe this pattern, for it is the pattern that resides in you and is manifest in Christ. For surely the old order is to serve him that he makes himself the servant to it, that it might be saved and redeemed. Father, we have a journey, and in it, Lord, we have been given a responsibility for service.

    May we serve with all humility, not such as the world admires, but such as glorifies you, such as is found finally in Elizabeth and in Mary, but principally in Jesus Christ. and in our God. We pray these things, O God, even as we look to you with joy for what you have provided us, trusting you for

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • The Babe Leaped for Joy

    The Babe Leaped for Joy

    This sermon is from the Rev. Charles G. Dennison sermon archive, part of the “Luke’s Christmas Story” series, and was preached at Grace Orthodox Presbyterian Church in Sewickley, PA, during a worship service on Sunday, December 7, 1997.

    About this sermon

    Throughout Luke, Christ blesses women with a new liberty and dignity. The New Testament uses women to teach about Christ, and Elizabeth and Mary show how. When Mary greets her, the child in Elizabeth’s womb leaps for joy.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    I’d like to offer a disclaimer to all who are listening to this tape. I offer this at the beginning so you will know that I’m aware of my own mistakes. During the course of this sermon I stated that Luke’s gospel is the only gospel to contain the story of the poor widow at the treasury of the temple in Luke 21. I have been corrected and am acknowledging that to you presently that of course there is a parallel text at the end of Mark 12. Take this in consideration as you listen to this message.

    Thank you. The name was Joseph of the house of David, and the virgin’s name was Mary. And the angel came in unto her and said, Hail, thou that art highly favored. The Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women. And when she saw him, she was troubled at his saying, and cast in her mind what manner of salutation this should be. And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary, for thou hast found favour with God.

    And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name Jesus. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest, and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David. And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever, and of his kingdom there shall be no end. Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man? And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of Baha’is shall overshadow thee. Therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God. And behold, thy cousin Elizabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age, and this is the sixth month with her. who was called barren, for with God nothing shall be impossible.

    And Mary said, Behold the handmaid of the Lord, be it unto me according to thy word. And the angel departed from her. And Mary arose in those days and went into the hill country with haste to a city of Judah, and entered into the house of Zacharias and saluted Elizabeth.

    And it came to pass that when Elizabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost. And she spake out with a loud voice and said, Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. And whence is this to me that the mother of my Lord should come to me? For lo, as soon as the voice of thy salutation sounded in mine ears, the babe leaped in my womb for joy. And blessed is she that believed, for there shall be a performance of those things which were told her from the Lord.”

    Luke, the writer of this Gospel and also of the Book of the Acts, could very well be called the Lord’s friend to women. I might say this about Luke not simply because of his approach to women in his writings generally, but because of his broader concern for those marginalized people in the first century A.D., among whom were the women. These marginalized people, appropriate vehicles then through whom we might observe the wondrous workings of redemption.

    For example, more than the other gospel writers, Luke commits space to the poor and their true concerns. At the same time, more than the other gospel writers, Luke devotes space to women, often combining them with the poor. For instance, only Luke records Jesus’ parable about the widow who pleads her case to the annoyed judge, Luke 18, verses 1-8. And only Luke tells the story about the poor widow who, while Jesus watched her, gave her all by depositing her last two copper coins in the temple treasury, Luke 21, verses 1-4. To be sure, Luke will end His Gospels, as others do, with women prominent at the cross and at the empty tomb. At the same time, Luke, throughout his Gospel, outdistances the other Gospels in the frequency with which he mentions women.

    He even makes a point to include them in his description of Jesus’ entourage in Luke chapter 8. Here in this account, verse 1, we have mention made, of course, of the twelve disciples, but there are also some women, Luke tells us, who have been healed of evil spirits and sicknesses. Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Susanna, and many others who were contributing out of their own private resources to the support of Jesus and the disciples, verses 2 and 3. Luke, therefore, could well be called the Lord’s friend of women.

    But this very fact occurs to us while reading Luke’s account of Jesus’ birth. Luke is not, as you know, the only gospel writer to provide us the story about Jesus’ birth. we also have the account of it in Matthew’s Gospel. But Luke’s story is much more extensive. In fact, it is more than three times the length.

    Further, Luke isn’t content to tell us merely about Mary as Matthew is he tells us about two women. He tells us about Elizabeth and Mary. In these two women, Luke, at the outset of his Spirit-inspired message, if by no other means than the amount of space given to these women, he will accent and highlight the gospel’s intention concerning women. Without a doubt, that intention, that purpose involved, it sets before us the new dignity, the new dignity mediated to women through Jesus Christ’s incomparable person and Now, you must not misunderstand Luke’s or the Gospel’s intention at this point. It is not to suggest that women in the biblical Old Testament religion hadn’t had a dignity all along, particularly that dignity is observed in the fact that the woman also is created in the image of God, but especially that she was privileged now that sin has come upon this creation, to bear in her body the promise of salvation. And although this privilege may be conferred upon a select few women throughout the history of salvation, as it is recorded in the Old Testament, Still, all the women of the covenant are seen as typically participating in the actual process by which salvation comes. Women, generically.

    Rightly, the Apostle Paul then says in 1 Timothy 2.15, women shall be saved through childbirth. By even granting a constant dignity to women in Biblical Old Testament religion, the gospel itself brings a new dignity for women.

    By that gospel, the woman is set free. Here is liberation. The woman is set free from the ancient strictures of the law. those strictures which preached to her her own uncleanness, yet strictures which were unable to remove that uncleanness from her.

    Under the law, she couldn’t as much as approach the temple, enter into it. and she was bound by a mandatory testimony and an inheritance to which she was only indirectly connected under a male family heir. But because of the gospel, and by the familiarity and the sufficiency of Jesus Christ’s blood Her own blood no longer enhances her sinfulness and the judgment of death that she carries in her own body. Because of the gospel, and by way of the power of Jesus Christ’s resurrection, she is no longer denied the exalted status, Son of God, and I say that with all seriousness. In her own person, not as an extension of the person of her father, or her brother, or her husband, or her son, that is, not as an extension of any male to whom she may be related in this world.

    In her own person, she now participates directly in the promised inheritance, belonging to all of the children of God in Christ, male and female alike. Nor is she denied access because of her gender to the courts of the Lord that she walks right into the assembly, being sacramentally sanctified for just such access.

    Luke, the friend of women, provides a powerful picture of this sacramental consecration and access in the book of Acts. In the most deliberate fashion, in Acts chapter 8, Luke tells us about Philip preaching among the Samaritans. When the Samaritans believed, they were baptized, and then Luke adds in verse 12, men and women alike. Here, not just a Samaritan, but a Samaritan woman is recognized as heir to the glorious inheritance. She is sacramentally sealed in an act that clearly moves her beyond the sacramental provisions of the Old Testament.

    But again, it is important that we not misunderstand Luke’s or the gospel’s intention. While Luke and the New Testament invests the woman with a new dignity and even exalts her, it does not intend to destroy the difference between her and the male. It does not intend to destroy the difference between females and males, or the roles appropriate to both. Earlier this year, at the Reformation season, we heard a powerful message from Dr. Nelson Klosterman, in which he contended that our roles, respective to each other, male and female, are an extension of office.

    We have an office in God’s economy to fill. and we live in keeping with God’s order as we are conscious of that office and fill it appropriately. But much less does the New Testament’s intention to elevate set the female above the male. However, at the same time, the New Testament does find in the woman that proper vehicle in whom we observe God’s dealings with his people in a most unique fashion. The New Testament does this in two ways. First, the woman is that proper vehicle in whom we are able to see the general pattern of salvation. in whom we are able to see the general pattern of salvation.

    God takes her without strength and without status. She has no inheritance in her own right. He takes her without strength, now epitomized, in a barren woman and in a virgin, obviously without strength even to conceive, he takes her who is without strength and without status, and by his saving work in Jesus Christ, he gives to her both, both strength and status. And what God has bestowed by grace, not by right, hear me in that, by grace, not by right, to the woman he bestows on all of his people in saving them. All of us in our powerlessness, all of us rendered without status. apart from the ministry and the work of Jesus Christ on our behalf.

    So the woman becomes a proper vehicle, an appropriate vehicle, in whom we are able to see the general pattern of salvation. But secondly, and more profound still, women in the New Testament become those proper vehicles in whom we are able better to see the particular movement for the history of redemption as we observe the progress from the old administration into the new, from the old order into the new.

    And here is the significance of the two women. for the story we read this morning. These two women, Elizabeth and Mary, will tell you the whole story of the Bible. They will present to you, in fact, something of the entire essential history of the world. These two women, if you have not thought of it already, these two women are the two Testaments, the Old and the New Testaments.

    And in their interaction with one another, we will witness them as servants of things greater than themselves. their interest being those greater things. In them, and in their interaction with one another, we will witness the operation of things greater than themselves, and we will observe the transformation of the old by the new. you will see, in what happens between them, the transformation of the old by the new.

    Elizabeth is the old testament. May be underscored by her age. She is the Old Testament. She embodies the Old Testament. She and her husband, for that matter, Zacharias, are the law. They are the Levitical order. They are Israel ensconced in Judah, performing service in Jerusalem, yet crippled and made fatally weak by faltering faith and bitter complaint. and her husband for that matter, all the law, the rabbinical order, they all, Israel, ensconced in Judah, performing service in Jerusalem, yet crippled and made fatally weak by faltering faith and bitter complaint.” You know the story of Zacharias, which is preceding the one that we’ve read this morning. Hell, he was struck dumb by the angel Gabriel for not believing the message about the coming birth of John the Baptist to his then and aged wife. Elizabeth, however, even more significantly than her husband, captures the heart of Israel.

    You may not have seen, you might not have understood her actions recorded in verse 24, or caught the tone of her reply in verse 25. In verse 24, she secludes herself in shame. This is not the action of a woman filled with praise and thanksgiving. She secludes herself in shame, and in verse 25, her words are a bitter, sarcastic, and faithless exclamation. The New American Standard Version may have inadvertently caught this in the way in which it has translated that twenty-fifth verse.

    This is the way the Lord has dealt with me in the days when he looked with favor upon me, to take away my disgrace among men?” Well, you can almost hear the intonations of a New Jersey or New York Jewish woman. This is the way the Lord has dealt with me.

    That’s Elizabeth’s response. But this is more than a bitter and thankless remark from an embarrassed and shamed woman. In it we are to hear all Israel, in her bitterness, constantly thankless and dissatisfied with the Lord’s dealings. despite the corrupt heart, the obvious unworthiness.

    Elizabeth carries within her, as does Israel whom she represents, a seed, a child, the remarkable remnant, true to God’s purposes in his covenant, and this one, John the Baptist, will direct even her, his mother, to her Savior. You are going to watch a conversion. You are now to witness the conversion of Israel into the church. This takes place when Mary visits. the other woman in the story. So she stands over against Elizabeth.

    She does not reside in Judah, even though she is of Judah. She does not reside in Judah, or in territory proximate to the temple. But like the very child she carries, she comes from an alien territory. into her own territory. For she is of Judah’s line, and she belongs in the territory of Judah, but she presently lives in Galilee, and now must journey to Judah to meet those who are related to her. But as with Mary, so with the child in her Jesus comes from the alien territory, the alien territory of heaven. He journeys to Judah and Jerusalem by way of Galilee in order to meet with his relatives who should be prepared to greet him.

    Later on, it will be by way of the ministry of John the Baptist that the path is prepared for Jesus in his ministry, but here John in the room leaps in anticipation of the latter recognition of Jesus the Messiah at the Jordan. in Mary, for that is what she represents.

    The New Testament has greeted the old, acknowledged the old upon entering the house, even as John in the Old Testament, Elizabeth, has rejoiced at the salutation of the new. But now, through this affirmation from the womb, John, even before he is born, leads Elizabeth, Israel of old, into the blessings of the new. Verse 41, she is filled with the Holy Spirit. you will notice that he is not without repentance the very substance of the ministry of John the Baptist, for he preaches repentance, does he not? And this repentance comes to expression in Elizabeth as she confesses that Mary, unlike herself, believed that there would be a fulfillment of what had been spoken to her by the Lord. Mary had said, you will remember, to Gabriel the angel, verse 38, Behold the handmaid of the Lord, be of them to me according to thy word. Here then in Mary is the new Israel into which now the old is brought by the grace of God, by the testimony of the prophet, by the last prophet, John the Baptist, and by the miracle of repentance and faith.

    But it is in the company of these two gentle women that you sit this morning, even as by faith you are bound to them both. And even more importantly, this morning you sit, do you not, in the company of Jesus Christ, the very one into whose service these two gentle women were enlisted, the very one in whom and through whom the ages of the world.

    Do you believe God? Have you received his salvation? Have you repented and expressed your own faith? Luke may well be the Lord’s friend to women, but only in order that women and all of us might be the friends of the Lord. You are a friend, are you not? Male or female?

    Our God, what a work how your kindness is manifest in the old and your mercy as you bring the old to the point where it will embrace the new and even be transformed by it. O Father, we are the beneficiaries of your mighty and glorious work. And Father, may we, your children, male and female alike, understand the service into which Elizabeth and Mary were enlisted. And may we also comprehend our position that we in fact sit with them if we have confessed like faith and expressed a repentance that is necessary even unto salvation. Lord, be merciful to us that the strength of all that you have done would be obvious to us even as we see our Savior by faith. And may we know the extent of his love and the greatness of his ministry for us even as we approach this table.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.