Sermon Series: John 19-21

  • Woman, Behold Your Son

    Woman, Behold Your Son

    About this sermon

    At the cross Pilate’s inscription proclaims Jesus King of the Jews in three languages, the soldiers divide his garments as Psalm 22 foretold, and Jesus entrusts his mother to the beloved disciple. That exchange is no mere family arrangement. In his final hour, with all things nearly accomplished, Jesus provides for his own and forms a new household of faith. He loved his own to the end and laid down his life for them.

    More sermons from John · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    Beloved, this is the word of God. So he then handed him over to them to be crucified. They took Jesus, therefore, and he went out bearing his own cross to the place called the place of a skull, which is called in Hebrew Golgotha. There they crucified him and with him two other men, one on either side and Jesus in between. Pilate also wrote an inscription and put it on the cross.

    It was written, Jesus, the Nazarene, the King of the Jews. Therefore, many of the Jews read this inscription, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city. It was written in Hebrew, Latin, and in Greek. So the chief priests of the Jews were saying to Pilate, do not write the King of the Jews, but that he said, I am the King of the Jews. Pilate answered, what I have written, I have written.

    Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his outer garments and made four parts, a part to every soldier, and also the tunic. Now the tunic was seamless, woven in one piece. So they said to one another, let us not tear it, but cast lots for it, to decide whose it shall be. This was to fulfill the scripture. They divided my outer garments among them, and for my clothing they cast lots. Therefore the soldiers did these things.

    But standing by the cross of Jesus were his mother and his mother’s sister, Mary, the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus then saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to his mother, woman, behold, your son. Then he said to the disciple, behold, your mother. From that hour, the disciple took her into his own household.

    After this, Jesus, knowing that all things had already been accomplished to fulfill the scripture, said, I am thirsty. A jar full of sour wine was standing there, so they put a sponge full of the sour wine upon a branch of hyssop and brought it up to his mouth. Therefore, when Jesus had received the sour wine, he said, it is finished. And he bowed his head and gave up his spirit. Thus far the reading of God’s inspired word. This is the gospel of Jesus Christ.

    Let’s pray together, shall we? Our Father, we ask that the words that are written here for our instruction would be light and life to us as they speak to us of Christ and all of his, oh God, glory and honor and power and wisdom and grace and the love with which he loved us even to the end. Father, we pray for the insight and grace of your spirit to illumine our hearts and minds to understand and believe those things that are here written. We pray for that same spirit to be active in the preaching of the word and the hearing of it together tonight, that we might in Christ grow, become strong in faith and doctrine. We pray these things now, giving the glory and the praise to you through Jesus. In that name we pray, amen.

    The last part of the passion narrative in John’s gospel here opens with the account of Jesus’ crucifixion. In contrast with the rather lengthy account of the trial before Pilate, which we read in chapter 18, verse 12, through chapter 19, verse 12, and in contrast with the synoptic account of the crucifixion, This last part in John is very concise and selective. Here again, John’s intentional selectivity and uniqueness in gospel writing are evident. Solely in John do we find the dispute between the Jews and Pilate over the inscription. Only in John do we find Jesus’ last will with respect to his mother. and the lengthy account of his death that will follow in verses 31 to 37, we’ve not read yet. Especially striking is the mention in verse 26, in this context of the crucifixion, of the disciple whom Jesus loved.

    So it is, immediately after Pilate’s decision, the decision is carried out. Jesus is handed over, he is delivered to them to be crucified. And you’ll note in the sermon title, we’re focusing upon some of those words that appear in the course of this gospel portion. Delivered, crucified, fulfilled, finished. Well, here in the opening verse, he is delivered, he is handed over to them to be crucified.

    The anonymous they, in verse 16, who are they, to whom he is delivered, in verse 16 and also verse 17 and verse 18, who take the initiative in the crucifixion, can only be the Roman soldiers who are mentioned specifically in verse 23 following thereafter.

    Although the antecedent to the pronouns they and them in these opening verses of our section would appear to be the Jews handing them over to the Jews. Surely the Jews are implicated. It was their demand that secured the crucifixion. It was Jesus’ prediction that they would deliver him up to be crucified, you see.

    And so there is even in the intent here, subtly perhaps, an intent for us to be thinking about the Jews even while we recognize that the actual act of crucifixion is a Roman act. Though the Jews do not actually perform the crucifixion, the text seems intent on tying them in as accomplices. The Jews only watch, but it is their desire that is being satisfied here. Jesus, carrying his own cross, then, goes out of the city to the place of the skull, which is called Golgotha, so named for its round, bare shape. looks like a skull.

    And there we read, they crucified him. The execution itself, an extremely cruel procedure as you know, is not described here. Simply the fact that two other men were crucified with him. With Jesus prominently at the center. He was, after all, the king of the Jews.

    Pilate has an inscription placed on the cross stating the reason for Jesus’ execution. A sign indicating the crime would be hung around the neck of a criminal on the way to execution. It was probably this sign that Pilate had the soldiers attached to the cross so that Jesus’ crime could be known to all. This matter in itself occasions still another conflict between Pilate and the chief priest. as we said, mentioned only in John’s gospel.

    The inscription that Pilate ordered read, Jesus the Nazarene, the King of the Jews. And because of the proximity of the place of execution to Jerusalem near to the city, verse 20 tells us that many of the Jews in Jerusalem, including many visitors for the Passover, read the inscription that was placed there on the cross. Here the Jews are obviously not those who had been hostile to Jesus to the point of the trial. But rather, the gospel writer seems to be including now the masses of the Jews who are in Jerusalem at the Passover, many of whom were by and large ignorant of what had taken place inside and around Pilate’s praetorium, and who were thus all at once confronted not only with Jesus’ execution, but also with the disgraceful way both for him and for them, in which he was being displayed as their king.

    Pilate added to the offense by, and in order to give the matter the widest possible publicity, if you will, having the inscription written up in three languages, Hebrew or a form of Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin, and Greek, which would have included then the local common language in Jerusalem, Aramaic. It would have included Latin, the official language of Rome, and it would have included Greek, which was the language of common international communication in the Roman Empire. And so there they are. Aramaic, Latin, and Greek.

    And there is the message, Jesus the Nazarene, the king of the Jews. Pilate had given the matter, obviously, careful thought, and thus paid back the Jews for forcing his hand contrary to his intended will for Jesus. If Jesus, with his royal pretension, was indeed so dangerous that he deserved to die on the cross as the Jews demanded, then the whole world would know what his crime was, according to Pilate’s inscription. No wonder then that the chief priests came to Pilate to protest. Now it seemed that Jesus would indeed be displayed before the whole world as their king. And thus we say, in their minds, to their shame, and go down in history as such. They asked therefore that the inscription be changed to say that Jesus only claimed to be the king of the Jews.

    He said so, but not was so. But Pilate was not to be pushed any further. Having agreed to crucify, he leaves the inscription as it is. He found no guilt in the man, saw him as no real threat. So Pilate’s last word, brief and to the point, was, what I have written, I have written. And having said that, he left them with their king hanging on the cross. In this remarkable detail, which occurs only in John, we see the continuation of the line that runs through the entire trial before Pilate. He can still not exercise any power other than what has been given him from above.

    Verse 11, what he was unwilling to undo Let the crucified Jesus of Nazareth be identified as the Messiah, as the King of Israel, is in fact the pivotal point in the entire passion narrative. For in fact, he is the Messiah. He is the King, not only of the Jew, but of the nations also. And this is so in what follows, that God’s sovereign disposition and authority from above, in what follows as Pilate and the Jews recede to the background, the focus is shifted to the crucified Jesus himself, who is now being lifted up and who is accomplishing that which was intended from the beginning.

    As we see again and again in this text, for the scriptures had not yet been fulfilled in him, verses 23 to 25, and he had not yet said and done everything that he would say and do before he knew that all things had already been accomplished or finished.

    Look at verse 28 with me for a moment. We are moving toward the place where Jesus knows that all things had been accomplished. And he will in fact declare in verse 30, it is finished. And I draw your attention to verses 28 and verse 30, because it’s the same word in both places. It is that same word finished. Jesus knew that things were finished. And then he declares it is finished from the cross. And then he bows his head and gives up the spirit. We’ll come back to that in just a bit. In verse 23, The soldiers are mentioned explicitly for the first time since verse two.

    After they have crucified Jesus then as their last item of business, they divide his garment among themselves, which they are entitled to as those who have carried out the crucifixion. Jesus’ inner garment is mentioned separately because it was seamless woven in one piece. literally woven from the upper part through the hole. The soldiers decided to leave that inner garment intact and so to cast lots for it.

    And here again is a detail not mentioned in the Synoptic Gospels, mentioned only by John, nor is in the Synoptics mentioned that the fact that the fulfillment of Scripture takes place here in John 19 verse 24 in that very deed. The fourth gospel writer, however, is concerned not only to include it, this detail about the garment and the fulfillment of scripture, in his briefer account as one of his intentional details, we’ve said he’s chosen carefully what he includes, but he draws attention to it and the fulfillment that goes with it, the fulfillment of Psalm 22, verse 18, that they cast lots for his garment. If you look then at verse 25 and you read the therefore that is found in verse 25. The therefore of verse 25 following on the heels of what the soldiers have done draws our attention to the fact that these four unknown soldiers who divided in four parts his outer garment and then cast lots for his inner garment.

    These four unknown unnamed soldiers fulfill the Lord’s sovereign disposition They did what they did therefore, you see, because they were fulfilling what God intended. And we say again how God’s sovereign disposition is what is at work and what is on display in these events. Things go according to God’s plan here. Even in the hour of Christ’s deepest humiliation, this is one of those things that had to be done to Christ. Had to be done. to fulfill the scriptures, and to demonstrate the sovereign God who is bringing these things to pass for his own glorious purpose.

    And even as we say that of that event, so too the next event, verses 25 to 27, is something that Christ had to do, had to do, regarding his mother and the disciple whom he loves. Jesus’ mother and the other women, we are told verse 25, were standing by the cross of Jesus. And that when Jesus therefore saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he speaks, and there’s a therefore in that verse 25, Jesus therefore seeing his mother and the disciple, he speaks those familiar words of verses 26 and 27. Again, noting these details, these verses are uniquely recorded in John’s Gospel and recorded for a purpose. He says to his mother, woman, behold your son. And to the beloved disciple, behold your mother. When he saw them, therefore he said what he said.

    Now many interpreters particularly Protestant interpreters, have restricted the significance of this little event, the significance of this passage to Jesus personally caring for his mother, a tender act. Even in the midst of the agony of the cross, Jesus is seen here as the caring son. Jesus is mindful of the sorrow and the loneliness that lie ahead for his mother, putting her need in this hour ahead of his own. And thus Jesus here by commentators is put forward as a moral example of love, of concern for the widow, for the mother who is in great need, not neglecting of his obligation to his mother, even at the point of his deepest distress.

    Of course, some commentators have gone in a more Roman Catholic direction here. And they particularly make of Mary the subject, make of her a subject of devout meditation. We want to reflect on the sorrowful woman, the sorrowful mother at the cross who is standing by. And so she is seen as the object here of what is in view in what John writes of her.

    Some have wrestled with the question, some commentators have wrestled with the question, why John? Why does Jesus give Mary, his mother, to John after all? Indeed, he is the disciple whom Jesus loved, but after all, did not Mary have other children? Blood relatives with a responsibility to care for their own? who should have shouldered the responsibility for her future care. So people have tried to think, well, perhaps there was some negative attitude on their part towards Mary. After all, had they not been among those who did not believe in Jesus, at least for a time, John 7, 5 says so, even his own brothers didn’t believe in him. So maybe there was some reason why John, the beloved disciple, rather than one of her actual blood relatives who may have cared for her.

    In that John, the gospel writer, chooses this as the final incident before his climactic verse 28. Look at verse 28. We believe that there is more going on here than the personal familial element. There’s more than family love here in an earthly sense.

    We read in verse 28 that after this, that is after this exchange with his mother and with the beloved disciple, after this, having said these things, after this, Jesus, knowing that all things had already been finished, had already been accomplished, in order that the scripture might be fulfilled, said, I am thirsty.

    And thus he is given the sour wine and he received it. And then comes the final, final, it is finished. And he bowed his head and he gave up his spirit. So we look at this incident, this exchange with his mother and with the beloved disciple, and we see it in this unique position of things not yet finished, now having said what he said, it’s finished. Things have been accomplished, you see. And so we must look back, or we must back up, and we must look more deeply at the exchange with his mother and the disciple whom he loved. What makes it the final event such that Jesus, having said these things, now knows, now knows it as all things already being finished. Something has happened here. Compare again, verse 28, verse 30, and we have the same word.

    Now he knows that things are finished, and now he says, I’m thirsty, and now he drinks the cup, and then he says, it’s finished, and declares it to all. The same word used in those two verses certainly capture our attention. And we think of Jesus drinking the cup that the father had prepared for him. As you remember Peter questioning him going to the cross, must should I not drink the cup the father has prepared for me? Well here it is, final great deed of Jesus is to drink the cup, the sour cup, the bitter wine, the glory cup, if you will, in fulfillment of scripture once again. This Coming to this conclusion, this finish is bound up with this exchange.

    Woman, behold your son. Disciple, behold your mother. However deep the sorrow in which Jesus sees his mother standing by the cross, that’s not what he speaks to her about. With extreme brevity, He refrains from even calling her mother. He asked her to relinquish him as son. And he refers her to the disciple standing by her as the one she is to recognize as hers. Behold, woman, behold your son. In turn, Jesus speaks to the disciple, asking, commanding, if you will, asking him to recognize his mother. Behold your mother.

    And from that hour, we read, the disciple took her into his own household. Typically, traditionally, we have understood that John took Mary home. And from that day forward, they lived together in the same house. Does that mean she now began to exercise her motherhood over John?

    We note that Jesus chooses his words and John records them with the utmost care and most severe economy. And I would dare say so charging them all the more with purposeful meaning. But wait a moment. Look closely at your English text. Notice that in verse 27, the word at the end of the verse, at least in the New American Standard, that is included there as home or household is generally italicized. And if it’s not italicized in your Bible, it should be. which means that the word is not really there in the Greek, but it seems to be implied.

    But I ask us to let us follow the text where it leads us and translate the sentence then, and from that hour, the disciple took her into his own. And from that hour, the disciple took her into his own. This is the second time that Jesus and Mary have met in the narrative of John’s gospel in a decisive use of the word hour. At the wedding feast in Cana, Cana, Mary had sought Jesus for a solution to the lack of wine at the wedding. And Jesus’ reply has hung over this entire gospel. Woman, what do I have to do with you? My hour. has not yet come. Underscore that word hour. My hour has not yet come.

    And there in that occasion, when Jesus speaks those words at the wedding to his mother, calling her woman, what have I to do with you? It’s not the family blood connection that Jesus is pointing to. It is the recognition on his part that his role as the messianic son of man has an hour in view. And that hour is in view from the beginning. He has come for that hour, an hour of glory, but that hour is not yet at Cana, at the wedding feast. The hour in which he would be delivered up, in which he would be delivered up to be crucified. An hour in which the prophetic word and the divine purposes would be fulfilled. Sermon title, listening. He would be delivered up. He would be crucified. The purposes would be fulfilled. The scriptures fulfilled and the work of redemption for which he was sent into the world would be finished.

    That hour had not yet come in John chapter two. When Jesus arrives in Jerusalem in John chapter 12, he declares decisively, now that the hour for the Son of Man to be glorified has come. It’s at the time of the Passover and the crucifixion is at hand. The hour embraces, that hour embraces the cross and obediently drinks the cup which the Father had prepared for him.

    What gives unique significance then to the passage involving Jesus’ mother and the disciple whom he loved at the conclusion of the crucifixion is not therefore that Jesus still regulates his earthly family affairs and relations involving John and Mary. It is rather that in these two persons, in this final moment, Jesus’ love is extended in a much deeper and wider way to those who are His own.

    His own. His sheep. His disciples. His beloved. His church. As He has come to drink the cup and to be lifted up in glory on the cross, He has done so in order to care for His own. And that’s quoting from the gospel throughout. That He loved His own even to the end, you see. And he gave himself for his own. And so it is that here he is giving himself in the final moments of the crucifixion for his own. Drinking the cup which the father prepared that he would drink it on behalf of his father for his own. And he has done so in order to care for his own. And he has laid down his life for them. Beloved, he has laid down his life for us.

    We are his own. so that this is then not merely a quaint, nostalgic, historical note pertaining to Mary’s place of residence after Jesus’ death, but it is a redemptive historical reference, a salvation historical reference in the manner of the fourth gospel, a reference to the new family of God. that from that hour took form as a result of Jesus finishing his work. In this manner alone can we fully understand why the evangelist has this particular incident, this particular event as the final act of the redemptive event of Jesus suffering and death. After this, after Jesus had uttered those words, we read verse 28, Jesus knew all things had already been finished, and thus does he finish the top to the dregs. So what is it that he does here? He says to the woman, behold your son, an apostle, a beloved disciple, and says to her, There’s your son. And to the man, to the disciple whom he loves, there’s your mother. Behold your mother. And from that hour, he took her into his own.

    This has to do with love. This has to do with the love Jesus had for his own in giving himself up so that now an apostle is to feed his sheep and to care for his own. Along the lines of what Jesus says in the Synoptic Gospels, behold my brother and my sister and my mothers, those who do the will of my father, those who are members of Christ, those who belong to me, they are now yours. Your own are Christ’s own. His own are your own, you see. And it is then for the apostle to love the woman, to love the church, to love the members of the body of Christ who were standing by the cross. And it is for the woman represented in Mary, the church of Jesus Christ, it is for her to love the sons of the church, to love the apostles as her own and to receive them for in receiving them, we receive Jesus himself.

    Jesus is handing over his church to the care of his apostles and his beloved disciples. These are mine. You take care of them. You love one another. And it’s done. And the work begins. And He’ll come back and He’ll say to Peter and John, feed my sheep, feed my sheep, feed my sheep, feed my lambs. They’re yours. They’re yours because they’re mine. They’re your own.

    And so it is, behoving a pastor to love the church as those who belong to Jesus. We’re looking beyond individuals. to the representation of the new church that is set in motion as the Son of Man is lifted up and draws all men to himself. And it was finished. And now the work is yours to carry on in his name. Let’s pray together. help us to embrace what has revealed to us in the scriptures that Jesus is the Christ, the son of the living God.

    There is life in his name and that he has given life to his church, to his own, that he gave himself up for his own and that we then should make his own our own and that we should love one another as he has loved us. We love because he first loved us. We embrace the church, and the church embraces her own. We receive the ministry of those whom you have given to your church.

    Behold, our sister and brother and mother, our sons, and let us love one another as the family, the family of God, the family belonging to Jesus. Our Father, indeed, as we come to the table tonight, that are reminded of what Christ has done for us, and how he has identified us, and how he has provided for our care, and what he calls us to as your people to love one another as we are. May we, O God, rejoice in the Son of Man whose hour of glory is finished, in the accomplishment of our redemption, who is now high and lifted up, who is coming again, and will receive his own to himself. hear our prayers of thanks and praise with rejoicing in the name of Jesus. Amen. Let’s sing together hymn number one. Let’s stand together.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • Behold the Man

    Behold the Man

    About this sermon

    Pilate presents the scourged Jesus in a crown of thorns and a purple robe: “Behold the man!” The chief priests demand crucifixion, first on a charge of insurrection and then of blasphemy, because he made himself the Son of God. Pilate grows more afraid, yet Jesus tells him he has no authority except what is given from above. To keep Caesar’s favor, Pilate hands over the true King of the Jews, at noon on the day of preparation for the Passover.

    More sermons from John · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    This is the Gospel of Jesus Christ, Gospel of John chapter 19, beginning with verse 1. Give your attention. May God bless these words to your hearing. Pilate then took Jesus and scourged him. The soldiers twisted together a crown of thorns and put it on his head, put a purple robe on him, and they began to come up to him and say, Hail, King of the Jews. give him slaps in the face.

    Pilate came out again and said to them, behold, I am bringing him out to you so that you may know that I find no guilt in him. Jesus then came out wearing the crown of thorns and the purple robe. Pilate said to them, behold the man. So when the chief priests and the officers saw him, they cried out saying, crucify, crucify. Pilate said to him, take him yourselves and crucify him for I find no guilt in him. Jews answered him, we have a law and by that law he ought to die because he made himself out to be the son of God. Therefore, when Pilate heard this statement, he was even more afraid.

    And he entered into the praetorium again and said to Jesus, where are you from? Jesus gave him no answer. So Pilate said to him, you do not speak to me, do you not know that I have authority to release you and I have authority to crucify you? Jesus answered, you would have no authority over me unless it had been given you from above. For this reason, he who delivered me to you has the greater sin. As a result of this, Pilate made efforts to release him, but the Jews cried out, saying, if you release this man, you are no friend of Caesar. Everyone who makes himself out to be a king opposes Caesar.

    Therefore, when Pilate heard these words, he brought Jesus out and sat down on the judgment seat at a place called the Pavement, but in Hebrew, Gabbatha. Now it was the day of preparation for the Passover. It was about the sixth hour, and he said to the Jews, behold your king. So they cried out, away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate said to them, shall I crucify your king? The chief priest answered, we have no king but Caesar. So he then handed him over to them to be crucified. This is the word of God.

    Let’s pray together. Our Father, as we consider Jesus Christ, his humiliation, might we, Lord, be ever mindful that these things of which we read occurred at just the right hour, according to plan, your divine plan, a plan that indeed, O God, brought to pass the great salvation that we know as our own. We pray, Father, that we would listen with spiritual ears, hearing and understanding those things that are herein contained. May we be found wise and faithful in this evil generation, shining forth as children of light, children of the day, who know and serve and love our King, even Jesus Christ. Bless now the reading, the preaching, the hearing of your word in our midst. You would be glorified in it. Grant power from above by the Spirit, we pray. In Jesus’ name, amen.

    Since Pilate had decided that Jesus was not guilty of the sedition with which he had been charged, Pilate hoped that Jesus’ accusers would be content if he inflicted a lighter punishment. The infliction of any punishment on one who had been convicted of no crime was an act of injustice to be sure. but ordinary residents in the province, such as Jesus was, not a Roman citizen, did not enjoy the legal protection extended to Roman citizens. Pilate probably reckoned that Jesus had been indiscreet in his public utterances and needed to be taught a lesson. Here again, John’s narrative is in line with that of the Gospel of Luke, according to whom Pilate said to Jesus’ accusers, nothing deserving death has been done by him.

    I will therefore chastise him and release him, Luke 23, verse 15 and following. The severest form of beating was not normally inflicted as a punishment by itself, but as a prelude to crucifixion or the like. Thus, in Mark’s passion narrative in chapter 15, verse 15, Jesus is sentenced to be scourged and crucified. This latter scourging was a murderous form of torture. Whips with which it was carried out were reinforced with sharp pieces of metal or bone, which left the victim’s body a bloody pulp. It’s not surprising that this treatment was sometimes in and of itself sufficient to cause a person’s death.

    If the flogging of John 19.1 was designed to teach Jesus a lesson, it may have been less severe than that scourging, but any beating carried out by Roman soldiers was certainly brutal enough. When they had carried it out, they engaged in a bit of brutal sport, as you know, with their victim here.

    His accusers had alleged he had claimed to be king of the Jews. And if so, let him be treated as a king then. So they dressed him up in a military cloak to serve as a royal robe. They placed a makeshift crown on his head and lined up to pay him a mock homage, each one giving him a blow on the face as he did so. The thorns of which the makeshift crown were plated were likely fierce and formidable, causing acute pain also in themselves.

    The pilot evidently hoped that the sorry spectacle of a man so disabled and disfigured by a severe flogging and dressed up in such mockery would satisfy Jesus’ accusers that he had learned his lesson and was no longer likely to do any harm. The implication of Pilate’s words, then, behold, I am bringing him out to you, that you may know that I find no guilt in him, was that in Pilate’s eyes, Jesus’ claims, such as they were, were more fit for ridicule than for serious legal action.

    You know what he had said back in chapter 18. And thus Pilate’s words, behold the man, might mean, so far as Pilate’s intention was concerned, here he is, poor fellow. But the evangelist discerns a deeper meaning, a deeper significance. As John writes, that deeper significance is well conveyed by the words. For John, behold the man, is a way of saying here is the son of man. The messianic son of man. The word become flesh man. A real man. The incarnate word man. A man not disassociated from the first man. Here is the man who willingly and freely gives himself over, comes out of the garden, now being crowned with the symbol of the curse upon his head.

    Not having his nakedness mercifully covered, but to be mockingly garbed in humiliation. Behold the man But the chief priest and their associates were in no mood to be pacified. The sight of Jesus dressed up as a pantomime king enraged them all the more. For in their mind, they were being exposed to ridicule even more than he.

    When some years later, a king of the Jews, Agrippa the Elder, made a public procession through Alexandria and the Greek populace of the city parodied the occasion by dressing a local derelict up in royal robes and paying him homage in the gymnasium. It was not the instrument of their sport. It was not this derelict who took the offense, but the Jewish community and the Jewish king had such an insult. Well, here Jesus is an insult to the Jews. It’s not so much that he is the insulted one, but to them he is an insult and a scandal. How dare you present this man in such form to us? He’s not our king after all.

    The Roman soldiers had expressed their contempt for the Jews by their treatment of Jesus. Here’s your king. Here is the way we treat this one who would dare claim to be your king. and the Jewish authorities thereby are all the more further exasperated.

    They knew quite well what the outcome would be if Pilate found Jesus guilty of the charge, which they preferred against him. For a non-Roman, the penalty for treacherous and seditious activity was almost bound to be crucifixion. During the generation that had elapsed since the death of Herod, they had seen ample evidence of this time and again of men who would have been so put to death in Judea and the adjoining regions. The Jews knew what they were after, and this was the penalty they sought for Jesus. And now, having seen this one presented to them in this mock king’s clothing, They demanded the outcome outright. In saying, take him and crucify him yourselves, as they had pled for his crucifixion, Pilate, they perceive, is teasing them again.

    He knew very well that they could execute no capital sentence against him, and even if they could, crucifixion was not a form of execution authorized by Jewish law. It appeared to Jesus’ accusers that their attempt to have him convicted and sentenced by Pilate on a charge of sedition, that is, of undermining authority, being a threat to the emperor and his underlings, was going to be unsuccessful. Therefore, they tried to gain their end by another route.

    Governors of Judea not only had the duty of enforcing Roman law in the province, they also undertook the responsibility of respecting, and where necessary, enforcing Jewish religious law. The claim to be king of the Jews was a capital offense against Roman law. The claim to be son of God was a capital offense against Jewish law. But if the governor would not grant a capital conviction in respect to the threat to Roman authority, he might be persuaded, on the other hand, to permit the execution of the capital sentence required by Jewish law in respect of the alleged blasphemy from the mouth of Jesus.

    A sentence which could not be carried out without the governor’s license, the apparent implication of chapter 18, verse 31. As they said, we are not in a position to execute in this way. The claim to be the Messiah could be construed both as a claim to be the king of the Jews and as a claim to be son of God. When the one formulation, which might have been expected to procure immediate conviction from Pilate, that is, an insurrectionist, a seditionist, seemed to fail in its purpose, the chief priests immediately try the other route.

    And their language presupposes that a claim to be son of God was in and of itself blasphemous and rendered Jesus liable to the death penalty. according to Jewish law prescribed in Leviticus 24 verse 16, which says, Moreover, the one who blasphemes the name of the Lord shall surely be put to death. All the congregation shall stone him. The alien as well as the native, when he blasphemes the name, shall be put to death. Quote Leviticus 24, 16. In the Old Testament, the anointed king of Israel was son of God by adoption. We might think of the language of Psalm 2.

    Today, I have begotten thee. Call him son of God. As applicable to the anointing of kings, of course, it has a prophetic messianic meaning, and I’m not denying that, but there is an Old Testament usage where one might be called justifiably son of God. But our Lord’s contemporaries, the men who stood around him that day, recognized that much more than this official relationship of a legitimate son of David sitting on a legitimate throne was implied in the language that he used when he called himself the son sent by the Father from heaven. And to that extent, these Jews who found fault with Jesus, were in a sense right. They got the message. Jesus was staking his claim to be the very Son of God, the only begotten of the Father. That Jesus spoke of himself as the Son of the Father sent from heaven is true. He would not deny.

    But this is the very thing that the Jews could not by any means accept. And if Pilate then would not send Jesus to the cross for sedition, for insurrection, he might agree to his execution for blasphemy. Pilate, however, rather than complying with their demand, is rather all the more heightened in his fear, we’re told. It was no blasphemy to a Greek or a Roman if a man claimed to be a son of God. If the claim was conceivably true, The man might just be a god-man of sorts. After all, there are some of those in Greek and Roman thought. Could it be so? No, not this man. Or maybe, or who knows? From the text, we perceive that Pilate feels some uneasiness now, and tried to cover it up by a display of authority.

    Where are you from, he asks. going back into the praetorium to Jesus. And here we find in John’s gospel this one reference of the motif of Jesus’ silence before Pilate. A silence that is prominent in Mark’s gospel to be sure, but here in John’s gospel it finds expression only once, only at this point in John 19 verse 9, Jesus is silent and did not answer. What answer that he could have given would have meant anything to a pagan judge or conveyed any sense of what he had in mind when he spoke to others of having come forth from the Father. But Pilate is annoyed by Jesus’ silence.

    In his mind it borders on contempt of court. Moreover, it is absolutely foolish to Pilate. After all, does Jesus not realize that he might arrange his release? Does Jesus not understand Pilate’s given power that he has to release or to crucify? But Jesus understands far better than Pilate. From a perspective Pilate cannot fathom. Jesus discerns behind Pilate’s discretionary power a higher authority than the emperor’s. The emperor himself, not to mention his local lieutenant, wields his authority only by the sovereign superintendents of God himself.

    Verse 11, you would have no authority over me, Jesus says, unless it had been given to you from above. From above certainly here denotes heavenly derivation. God has placed you here is what Jesus is saying. Jesus is enunciating substantially the same principle that Paul does in Romans 13.

    There is no authority except from God and those that exist have been ordained by God. For the well-being of men and their societies, God has ordained that certain authority be vested in certain officers, certain offices. And those who occupy such offices cannot avoid their responsibility to God, having been placed there by God in his providence. But even more profound in this hour is that in this hour that has been appointed from above, is the hour that has been appointed that Jesus Christ must drink the cup of sorrow and woe. And it must go according to that plan. For this reason, Jesus says, he who delivered me up to you has the greater sin.

    Of whom does Jesus speak here? Judas? Not likely, although he definitely had a role. We say not likely, for his role seems to have ceased at the arrest in the garden, not directly involving Pilate. Therefore, more likely, Jesus refers here to the high priest or to the Jewish authorities as a collective whole.

    Jesus is stating that his own people are inevitably more involved, more culpable in his death than is the Roman governor. who is being pressed now by the Jews to fulfill his given office. He had come to his own, and his own received him not. And they, in turn, have turned him over to the Roman governor. And if Pilate had found no substance in the charge of Jesus threatening Roman authority, he certainly had no mind then to take up the religious charge. And so he attempts then again to release Jesus, but he is again rebuffed by the children of the devil, bent on Jesus’ destruction.

    They cry out, if you release this man, you are no friend of Caesar. Everyone who makes himself out to be a king opposes Caesar. Recognize this is no empty threat. Pilate’s military political power is in jeopardy here. Grant Jesus release and you will prove you are disloyal to Caesar.

    The Jews knew how to play the trump card in that culture and society. What would be the emperor’s reaction, this rather flippant emperor, if it were reported to him that his governor in Judea had acquitted a man brought before him on a charge of insurrection, attested by many fine, upstanding religious leaders of the day? To save face then and to save his seat at the table, Pilate must judge and condemn Jesus, lest the ax fall on his own neck. How could he do otherwise?

    We are told it was the sixth hour. At midday, high noon, on the day of preparation for the Passover, the Jews’ great high feast among their traditions, celebrating their great deliverance and their liberation out of Egypt. Rome’s governor here in Judea sits in his seat, having been trapped by the chief priest.

    He sees no alternative to condemning Jesus to death, but he has his last little revenge on them by insisting that this blood-stained and disheveled figure is their king. He declares, behold your king. They will not, indeed they cannot see him as such. Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Their kingdom after all. is of this world. They will not have this one to be our king. This man is not our king. We have, they say, no king but Caesar. The story is all so familiar. The outcome is so well known.

    But beloved hear the word of the gospel, meant for your instruction and your encouragement. Beloved, behold your king. This is gospel. The gospel writer sees and he hears. And what he sees and he hears, he testifies. Jesus is the true king of the true Israel. For all who believe, who know the truth and hear his voice and obey. Here is the man of God’s appointment. Here is the true Passover lamb. The lamb about to suffer his death at the appropriate hour. of the appropriate day for the life of his people. How interesting, on this day, it is Pilate who preaches the gospel.

    Our Father, help us to see, to understand, to believe, to know full well that this was according to plan. A plan, oh God, that most certainly in its awesome design included the wicked deed of wicked men bent on the chief of wickedness. And yet there, O God, is the wisdom of God, and the grace of God may manifest. The lamb led to the slaughter, silent before his shearers, that one who had come down from heaven to give himself as a ransom for many. Whose kingdom is not of this world, the very Son of God, installed on Zion’s holy hill, against whom the nation’s rage, the Son of God, this day, exalted and lifted up.

    At high noon, for all to see, and as many as would see, and hear, and believe, they would be saved. Our Father, we pray that you would humble us again, remind us again of these great and wonderful things accomplished in the face of wicked men who set their hearts on things of this world, whose power, whose desire for power in this world, the things of the politics of this world is their chief desire and delight. I contrast those who set their minds and their hearts on heavenly things, eternal things, and trusting themselves into the hands of Almighty God to whom vengeance belongs. Our Father, hear our prayers and thanks as we conclude this Lord’s Day together in Jesus’ name. Let’s sing together hymn number 214.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.