Sermon Book: Luke

  • The Wow and the Why

    The Wow and the Why

    About this sermon

    Isaiah 40 announced comfort for God’s people, and Luke 2 shows that comfort arriving in the child Jesus. The shepherds told what they had seen, and Simeon took the infant in his arms and blessed God, for his eyes had seen the Lord’s salvation, a light for the Gentiles and the glory of Israel. God incarnate came near in true flesh and blood, and believers slow down from the distractions of the season to worship him with wonder.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    It’s a joy and privilege to be with you once again to open God’s Holy Word. And before we do turn to our primary passage this evening, please turn to Isaiah chapter 40. I used the last portion of this as the call to worship this evening, and I was delighted to see, if I’m not mistaken, that there was a sermon this morning on Isaiah chapter 40, so this works well. The Spirit loves to weave these things together in the minds of preachers who are not in any way in collusion. Isaiah chapter 40. We’ll read verses 1 through 9. Isaiah 40, verses 1 through 9.

    This is God’s holy word. Comfort, O comfort my people, says your God. Speak kindly to Jerusalem and call out to her that her warfare has ended, that her iniquity has been removed, that she has received of the Lord’s hand double for all her sins. A voice is calling.

    Clear the way for the Lord in the wilderness. Make smooth in the desert a highway for our God. Let every valley be lifted up. Let every mountain and hill be made low. Let the rough ground become a plain and the rugged terrain a broad valley. Then the glory of the Lord will be revealed and all flesh will see it together for the mouth of the Lord has spoken. A voice says, call out. Then he answered, what shall I call out? All flesh is grass and it’s loveliness like the flower of the field. The grass withers, the flower fades when the breath of the Lord blows upon it. Surely the people are grass. The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever. Get yourself up on a high mountain, O Zion, bearer of good news. Lift up your voice mightily, O Jerusalem, bearer of good news. Lift it up, do not fear. Say to the cities of Judah, here is your God.

    And now please turn to the Gospel of Matthew. Just before our passage in Luke, we’ll look to the Gospel of Matthew chapter five. Our Lord Jesus taking upon himself in a very self-aware way, not only the mantle of the Old Testament prophets, but the very fulfillment of the scriptures they spoke and wrote, including, of course, the passage that we just read. So, Matthew chapter 5, just a few verses. Matthew chapter 5, beginning in verse 17, excuse me. Matthew chapter 5, beginning in verse 17. Do not think that I came to abolish the law or the prophets. I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill.

    For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say to you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.

    And now please turn to the gospel of Luke chapter two. Luke chapter two. And the reason for these preceding passages are in the first case, the consolation and the great proclamation of comfort to come to God’s people. And then Matthew five shows us by and or rather how and by whom that comfort comes. It comes by the Lord Jesus Christ, who, as I alluded to earlier, fulfills from the heart every last syllable of the written word of God. And so now we see the Lord Jesus brought as a boy to meet two saints who had very much had lives steeped in these scriptures and who were looking actively and viscerally for the hope and the consolation of God’s people. And then they saw him. Luke chapter two, let’s begin our reading in verse 15. Once again, this is God’s holy word.

    When the angels had gone away from them into heaven, the shepherds began saying to one another, let us go straight to Bethlehem then and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has made known to us. So they came in a hurry and found their way to Mary and Joseph and the baby as he lay in the manger. When they had seen this, they made known the statement which had been told them about this child and all who heard it wondered at the things which were told them by the shepherds. But Mary treasured all these things. pondering them in her heart. The shepherds went back glorifying and praising God for all that they had heard and seen, just as had been told them.

    And when eight days had passed before his circumcision, his name was then called Jesus, the name given by the angel before he was conceived in the womb. And when the days for their purification according to the law of Moses were completed, they brought him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord. As it is written in the law of the Lord, every firstborn male that opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord, and to offer a sacrifice according to what was said in the law of the Lord, a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons.

    And there was a man in Jerusalem whose name was Simeon. And this man was righteous and devout, looking for the consolation of Israel. And the Holy Spirit was upon him. And it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not see death before he had seen the Lord’s Christ. And he came in the Spirit into the temple.

    And when the parents brought in the child Jesus to carry out for him the custom of the law, then he took him into his arms and blessed God and said, Now, Lord, you are releasing your bondservant to depart in peace according to your word. For my eyes have seen your salvation. which you have prepared in the presence of all peoples, a light of revelation to the Gentiles and the glory of your people Israel. And his father and mother were amazed at the things which were being said about him. And Simeon blessed them and said to Mary, his mother, behold, this child is appointed for the fall and rise of many in Israel and for a sign to be opposed. and a sword will pierce even your own soul, to the end that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed.

    And there was a prophetess, Anna, the daughter of Phanuel of the tribe of Asher. She was advanced in years and had lived with her husband seven years after her marriage, and then as a widow to the age of 84. She never left the temple, serving night and day with fastings and prayers. At that very moment, she came up and began giving thanks to God and continued to speak of him to all of those who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem. When they had performed everything according to the law of the Lord, they returned to Galilee, to their own city of Nazareth. The child continued to grow and become strong, increasing in wisdom, and the grace of God was upon him.

    Brothers and sisters, let’s pray now and ask for the Lord’s blessing on both the preaching and the hearing of these His words, which we’ve just read. Let’s pray. Father, we quiet our hearts and we focus them once again now for the preaching of your holy word. We thank you that this written word was meant to be preached and we pray for the blessing of your spirit that it would be proclaimed in truth and that it would be received by your people with faith and love. Father, as always, we cry out to you on behalf of any in this assembly who do not know Christ as Lord and Savior. Father, however many times perhaps that person or those people have heard the gospel If it has never hit home, oh God, please would this evening be the time and these moments be the moments that you’ve set aside for all of eternity to move by your power in that heart or those hearts to bring faith and life and freedom in Christ. And for all of us, Lord, who do know you, we pray that these scriptures this evening with which we may be very familiar would be fresh to us this evening, that by the grace of your spirit, we would hear what the good shepherd, the Lord Jesus, would say to us this very evening through this word that has already been spoken and recorded. And we pray that you would strengthen us and build us up by these words and conform us, as has already been prayed, more fully to the character of the one to whom every syllable points, the Lord Jesus Christ.

    We ask these things in his holy name. Amen. We often hear this phrase commonly used among Christians.

    I wanna examine it a little bit more deeply this evening, and that’s the expression, a childlike faith. What does it mean to have a childlike faith, especially in the way that the Lord Jesus commends it in the Gospels? Well, our text this evening teaches us to have a childlike faith by way of telling us of two very mature blessed saints. Sadly, older adults tend to suffocate kids’ curiosity very early on in their lives. What’s the question little kids always love to ask, and that we older adults almost always try to shut down?

    It’s the question of why. Why, why, why, why, why? Granted, that question is sometimes asked disrespectfully or perhaps out of a spirit of malcontent, in which case those conversations should be shut down. But in itself, Why is a brilliant question. Why can wrap its arms around the universe?

    And in the heart of a child whose eyes are aglow with curiosity, why is a question born not only of that curiosity, but also of wonder and even affection? This is why children are the truest and the very best learners. They love to ask why and they also love to say wow. And they smile as they learn truths which stagger their young souls.

    And so we should want to answer them in a way that provokes more curiosity, more wonder, more affection, because these instincts that boil up within their souls and come to overflowing in the form of the question why, these instincts are God-word instincts. They are meant to lead their inquisitive hearts to the only one who can answer a question as big as why, and who can provide all the wow that their young hearts crave, and even more.

    The Lord does not answer, of course, all of our specific why questions. He does not directly speak to every issue to the extent that we sometimes wish He would when we cry out why. But think of how much, brothers and sisters, that He has said directly to us. Wow. And here’s why. Jesus says it’s out of the abundance of the heart that the mouth speaks. And here we have words from the mouth of God, the inspired expression of his abundant heart.

    A childlike faith then seeks to know God’s heart by way of God’s word. Childlike faith trusts God’s word, and as is the nature and purpose of this word, childlike faith is led by God through that word to God’s son. And that childlike faith is having a field day in the hearts of the two blessed saints the Lord tells us about in our text this evening. For Anna and for Simeon, their childlike faith had become sight as they beheld the Son of God.

    There’s so much wow in their hearts. And in this text, in this evening, to kindle our own childlike trust in the scriptures and therefore in the very same Savior which they beheld with their own eyes. We’ll explore the why behind the wow that Luke makes such a priority in his narrative. Let’s look at that wow. Luke tells us over and over in his gospel, and in these early chapters in particular, the people marveled at what was happening. They pondered these things. Mary does in her heart.

    In Luke 2, as we’ve read, speaking of the shepherds to whom the angels had just announced the good news of Jesus’s birth. So they hurried off and found Mary and Joseph and the baby who was lying in the manger. When they had seen him, they spread the word concerning what had been told them about this child. And all who heard it were amazed at what the shepherds said to them. In verse 33 of our passage, Mary and Joseph react to what Simeon said about their boy. This child’s father and mother marveled at what was said about him. And remember, if you’re familiar with these events as recorded in scripture, Mary and Joseph had both been visited by angels from heaven, telling them what was to be and telling them who it was that God was entrusting to their care.

    And so why does Luke repeat what might seem to be redundant? Well, he lets us know that they hadn’t gotten over it. How could they have? Luke keeps putting before us the astonishment, the amazement, the wow-ness of what was happening because he and ultimately the Holy Spirit want us to feel it too. And the wow wasn’t prompted merely by the miraculous nature of everything that was going on. that the Savior was finally in the world and that the Savior was God incarnate wasn’t just a stunning display of supernatural might. Friends, it wasn’t just powerful, it was personal. With insight given by the Holy Spirit, Luke tells us what’s happening in Mary’s heart. Again, verse 19, Mary was treasuring these things in her heart.

    She was pondering them. There’s nothing more basic to the human experience and perhaps nothing more beautiful than the relationship between mother and child. The mutual affection and love between mother and child. Well, how about the relationship between this mother and that child? What a wonderful expression of God’s own heart. God incarnate’s first relationship with mankind was with a woman. Mary brings God incarnate into the world. She holds God incarnate in her arms and leads God incarnate by his hand.

    And of course, with a great capacity to love and great things to love comes a profound capacity for sorrow. And we read about that in verses 34 and 35. Simeon tells Mary that her son would be a sign that would be opposed. and it would be as if a sword was driven into the core of her being. Later, we see this coming into fulfillment as Mary watches her son suffer in his saving work, ultimately upon the cross, again like a sword thrust into her soul. In highlighting the personal impact of the incarnation and here of the birth and the presentation of Jesus, Luke is emphasizing the depth to which Almighty God has entered into the human experience. Listen to Psalm 113, which we’ll sing later.

    The Lord is exalted over all the nations, his glory above the heavens. Who is like the Lord, our God, the one who sits enthroned on high, who stoops down to look on the heavens and the earth? He raises the poor from the dust and lifts the needy from the ash heap. He sets them with princes, with the princes of their people. He settles the barren woman in her home as a happy mother of children.

    Praise the Lord. Well, in the birth of Jesus Christ and in his presentation here in the temple, the saints in our text see the loving heart of their merciful God literally fleshed out. And Luke’s continued interest in the very personal dimensions of the incarnation and the birth and the presentation of Jesus emphasizes, pun very much intended, the humanity of it all. John also takes great pains in his gospel and also in his little letter that we call First John to really put before us the true flesh and blood humanity of the Son of God.

    In John 1.14, the word became flesh. And John opens his letter we call First John this way, that which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our own eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands concerning the word of life. Our passage emphasizes Simeon taking hold of this baby boy in his arms.

    Luke, and ultimately the Holy Spirit, want us to take personally the joy and the wonder felt by these saints whose faith had become sight. For so many, many reasons, the Holy Spirit wants us to know the nature and the reality of the incarnation, not least so that we human beings will be drawn close by our common experience of humanity to God’s own Son, so that we can personally identify with the one who not only stooped down to look upon the heavens and the earth, but who went to such astounding lengths to personally identify with us. Luke wants us to feel it. Luke wants us to know it. And not only the joy and the wonder and to ponder and treasure these things in our hearts, but Luke and the Spirit who led his writing also want us to feel the heaviness and the sorrow that comes with understanding why this blessed boy was there. Why the Lord himself came into the world. Again, please look at verses 34 and 35 of Luke chapter two.

    And Simeon blessed them and said to Mary his mother, behold, this child is appointed for the fall and rise of many in Israel and for a sign to be opposed. And a sword will pierce even your own soul to the end that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed. Think of it, brothers and sisters, and let’s take this personally.

    Why would Mary’s son, why would the one who, according to John, was the one through whom the world was created, why would Mary’s son, the God-man, be opposed? Because of human opposition to God, our opposition. We turned away from God in the Garden of Eden, And we daily take up that fall in our words and thoughts and actions. And to be brought back into a right relationship with God, we needed a savior.

    And so early on in his gospel, Luke presses our hearts to feel that need very personally. And friends, that’s another wonderful thing about children. And I think something that has to do with childlike faith. Children know their neediness. They know their needs.

    And again, sometimes the expression of that need is more of the sin of which we’re all guilty. Sometimes our children think they don’t need anyone or anything, much less to listen to adults telling them what to do. That’s childish, not childlike. And every one of us here can attest to the fact that we adults are often very childish like that.

    Who are they to think they know what they’re talking about more than I do? Who are they to tell me what to do, whether or not they’re my authority? But when we’re humble and when we’re honest, we are struck with a deep and sometimes painful sense of our absolute dependence as creatures. And when we are humble and honest about our personal sin, when we’re not obsessing over the sins of others, We know we owe to God a debt which we cannot possibly pay. We need help. We need salvation. We need more than help. We need life from the dead. Have you ever been in a desperate situation? You’re out of options and you’re hurting, but you know of a particular friend or perhaps a loved one who can help. and whose mere presence can calm you and focus you in the midst of this crisis.

    And so you call for that loved one and you wait. And when that loved one gets there, you just can’t help but hug that person. You hold on to that person and you say something like, I can’t believe you’re here. I can’t believe you’re here. It’s not that you literally can’t believe that that person is there. It’s just that maybe it seems too good to be true, especially now in the midst of your trauma. But there that person is, tangibly by your side to help. And you just have to embrace that person.

    Well, again, notice in our text, Simeon was content, was not content rather, just to see the promised Messiah. Simeon had to hold this boy in his arms. verses 27 and 28. And when he came in the spirit into the temple and when the parents brought in the child Jesus to carry out for him the custom of the law, then he took him up into his arms and blessed God.

    See, Simeon and also Anna, they were studied experts on their own neediness and on the neediness of their people. They really understood why the Savior had come. how much they personally needed him. Their humble wow came from knowing why. Jesus came to meet the very real, relentless, and righteous requirements that God has of his image bearers, but of which all of us fall short. All of us, except the boy in our text. At this point in Luke’s Gospel, he has taken great pains to ground the coming of Christ in a very particular context.

    Jesus came in fulfillment of the Old Testament to save his people from their sins. In verse 21, when eight days were completed for the circumcision of the child, a reference to the requirements of the Old Testament law. Verse 22, according to the law of Moses. Verse 23, as it is written in the law of Moses. Verse 24, according to what was said in the law of the Lord. And in verse 39, when they had performed all things according to the law of the Lord. Over and over and over, Luke again emphasizes the conformity of what was happening to that which had been written.

    I think of what all of these ceremonial laws and customs and these sacrifices pointed to. God having mercy on his people, his forgiving them, his redeeming them, and now remember what our Lord said of himself in Matthew 5. Do not think that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets. I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them. Again, if you’re familiar with that passage, it’s so easy to take that passage in Matthew 5 for granted. They’re very familiar words from the Lord Jesus. I’ve not come to abolish, but to fulfill.

    But we sometimes miss the wow of what Jesus is saying there. At his most immediate audience in the Sermon on the Mount, they may have heard the Lord Jesus talk about and extol the Word of God. And he says, truly, truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, in our vernacular, not the least dot on the I or stroke on the T, the cross on the T, will pass away from the law until everything is accomplished.

    And his hearers could have easily said or thought, well, that’s wonderful, Jesus, but of course that’s true. This is the word of God that we’re talking about. So of course, every last little detail will come about exactly as God said it would. Of course that’s true, Jesus.

    The really stunning thing that Jesus said before them, he didn’t just say that the word of God would all come to pass. He said, I’m the one who’s going to do it. It is all about me, and I will fulfill every dot on the I and cross on the T. And that would have been truly stunning. Jesus came not as the previous prophet saying, thus says the Lord, thus says the Lord. Jesus came saying, I say to you, this is the word of God.

    This is the word of God incarnate. This is the Lord Jesus. This is the Savior taking upon himself, as I said, not only the mantle of the Old Testament prophets, but the substance of that which they preached. And here he is in the temple. Simeon took that Savior into his arms. He held in his arms the one who was the promised consolation of his people. After so long, after so much time, after so many promises were made, he was finally here. Anna had waited long and intently in her life.

    Even though some translations have a specific number here, scholars do debate her exact age. But one thing is clear, she is aged. And she had spent the vast majority of her life serving the Lord, praying and longing for redemption in Jerusalem. She spent the vast majority of her time in the temple, so much so that she’s described as never leaving. She fasted, she prayed night and day, and then her prayers were answered quite literally before her eyes. The one to whom she had dedicated her entire existence and every moment of her waking day was suddenly there before her. And she thanked God.

    And she went out and told others who were also looking for and longing for the Messiah. These saints are so childlike in their wonderment, in their rejoicing. They were very deeply well aware of their need and the world’s need of the one whom they were now seeing with their own eyes.

    Brothers and sisters in Christ, do you know, really know, the depth of your need for the Savior in this text, the Savior to whom all the scriptures point us? For those of us who claim faith in the Savior, who claim to already know who He is and why He came, have we lost our wow at the fact that He actually did? Have we lost our deep sense and understanding of the Incarnation’s implications in our everyday lives? How long has it been, child of God, since you’ve been really quiet in your soul and truly pondered and truly marveled at what is once the most basic and the most astounding truth of our faith?

    And that’s Immanuel, God with us. Have we made the time to be so moved? Well, praise God, God has made it for us. We all need the Sabbath day. We need to take God’s counsel and His command to cease, to slow down, to focus our hearts upon Him, lest our first love die the death of a thousand distractions. What a precious gift, especially in our day, is the Lord’s day. In the midst of a very loud culture, it’s really hard to be quiet in our hearts. We think of it again with reference to our children.

    When we’re working with kids, when we’re teaching them, we tell them, don’t be distracted, don’t be focused, stay on task. And in the days of social media, adults telling kids not to be distracted might rank right up there on the list of all-time great hypocrisies. You can imagine an adult instructing a child, why can’t you focus? Why can’t you pay attention?

    Hang on, I gotta take this. We are very distracted. We are very off focus, and the Sabbath lets us get blessedly back to basics, to the great big combination of why and wow at the heart of the Christian faith. Think of it, brothers and sisters. God became man. Why? Luke tells us later in his gospel, quoting Jesus, The Son of Man came to seek and to save that which was lost. That’s you. And that’s me. He came to seek and to save you. Wow. And brothers and sisters, this really happened.

    We are reading about historical events here. Luke opens his gospel to make sure we know that this happened. This isn’t some fairy tale. The opening words of Luke’s gospel are these. inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile a narrative of the things that have been accomplished among us, just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the Word have delivered them to us, it seemed good to me also, having followed all these things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, that you may have certainty concerning the things you have been taught.”

    It really happened. And just as surely as the Lord came once, these scriptures tell us very clearly He will come again. You will see Him. And just like Anna and Simeon, your expectations will be fulfilled and in an even fuller way because it’s settling us into eternity when it happens for all of us. Our faith will become sight.

    How much do you want to see your Savior? How much do you want that reunion with your loved ones who have already gone on to be with them? This, again, and just very briefly as we close, is where our kids can teach us so much. Because in their hearts, why goes to wow goes to how long? How long? Another brilliant question kids ask, and the psalmists ask that question all the time. How long, oh Lord, how long? It’s a good childlike question. And yet, waiting well takes maturity. Again, we see that in kids. We hear it, this is gonna take forever. So how do we await our Lord?

    Well, Anna teaches us. Again, very briefly. Luke emphasizes not only Anna’s agentness, he emphasizes her activity. Anna is serving the Lord day and night in the temple. Psalm 113, again, we’ll sing that in just a few moments. From the dawn to setting sun, praise the Lord, the mighty one. Anna took that very seriously. And her heart in this text is a microcosm of awaiting people. They are active and not passive. They are hurting and they are hopeful.

    And they are persevering in the work to which God called them to do every moment before their faith becomes sight. On the other side of Christ’s birth, the cross, the resurrection, we find ourselves in the same position as these blessed mature saints who were so full of childlike faith. And yet we have much more of the Word of God than they did, and so much more of the inspired abundance of God’s good heart before us, and also of the promise and the proclamation of Jesus, that blessed are the ones who have not seen and yet believe. So may we as his people, when he returns, whenever that is, be found waiting, and with eagerness and humility and love, serving others in his name. May we wait well until the Lord Jesus brings us home.

    Let’s pray together. Our gracious God and our Heavenly Father, we so easily lose sight of the most profound, the most basic, the biggest truths in all of created reality. We so easily interpret your promises in light of our personal pains and find those promises lacking. Oh God, by the grace of your spirit, would you completely reorient that intention or that tendency in our hearts And may we see our daily lives, the happiness as well as the deep difficulties and discomforts. May we see these in light of your promise.

    May we understand every moment of our lives as coming from you who are working even now to sum up all things in the Lord Jesus Christ. You who have promised that all things work together for good for those who love you and are called according to your purpose. You who have moved heaven and earth to send your son into the world to fulfill and to live out your promises. You who have sworn by your own name and have given the life of your own son to bring us home. Again, Father, if there are any in this assembly who do not know you, would you move in that heart or those hearts to bring repentance from sin, to bring an irresistible seeking after the Lord Jesus Christ as Savior and Friend and Shepherd and King.

    And Father, for all of us who do, may we wait well. Give us patience and perseverance every day until the coming of our Savior. We pray, O God, that we would not feel you to be distant because you are not. We praise you for the power and the presence of your Holy Spirit. We pray that we would not grieve the Spirit, but, Lord, that we would live by the Spirit and fulfill those purposes for which you have called us to life in Christ. We praise you in his holy name. Amen.

    Well, as mentioned a couple of times in the sermon, we’ll sing now Psalm 113. We’ll use the A selection from your Psalters, and then I’ll pronounce the benediction, and then our closing hymn will be on page 86, and the third verse of that particular selection. Please stand, people of God, and let’s sing in praise of our Lord. Psalm 113, selection A.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • Crowns, Thorns and Anointed Ones

    Crowns, Thorns and Anointed Ones

    About this sermon

    Zechariah’s last night vision shows chariots going out to the ends of the earth, and the prophet sets a crown on the high priest Joshua and names the Branch who will build the Lord’s temple and bear royal honor as priest on his throne. At the birth of John the Baptist, his father Zechariah sang of the God who had visited his people and raised up a horn of salvation in the house of David. John came in the spirit and power of Elijah to prepare the way for Christ, the priest-king in whom the whole Bible’s message meets.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    The Holy Scriptures come to us from two great texts, texts rarely preached, I fear. Zechariah 6, 1-15, Luke 1, 57-80. Let us then pay due heed to the Word of God. First, from the prophet Zechariah. Chapter 6, 1-15. I looked again, and there before me were four chariots coming out from between two mountains, mountains of bronze. The first chariot had red horses, the second black, the third white, the fourth dappled, all of them powerful. I asked the angel who was speaking to me, What are these, my lord? The angel answered, These are the four spirits of heaven going out from standing in the presence of the Lord of the whole world. The one with the black horses is going toward the north country. the one with the white horses toward the west, and the one with the dappled horses toward the south.

    When the powerful horses went out, they restrained him to go throughout the earth. And so he said, go throughout the earth. And they went throughout the earth. Then he called to me, see, those going toward the north country have given my spirit rest in the land of the north.

    The word of the Lord then came to me. Take silver and gold from the exiles, Haldai, Tobai, and Jediah, who have arrived from Babylon, and go the same day to the house of Josiah, son of Zephaniah. Take the silver and the gold, and make crowns. And set one on the head of the high priest Joshua, son of Jehoshadak.

    Tell him, this is what the Lord Almighty says. There is a man whose name is Branch. And he will branch out from his place and will build the temple of the Lord. It is he who will build the temple of the Lord. And he will be clothed with majesty and sit and rule on his throne. And there will be a priest upon his own throne. And there will be a covenant of peace between the two of them. The crown will be given to Heldi, to Lai, to Dai, and Han, the son of Zephaniah, as a memorial in the temple of the Lord. Those who are far off will come and help to build the temple of the Lord, and then you will know that the Lord Almighty has sent me to you. This will happen if you diligently obey the Lord your God.

    So far the reading from the Old Testament, and now the reading from the New, from the Gospel of Luke. The story of another Zechariah, this Zechariah the priest, husband of Elizabeth, the cousin of Mary, and the father of John the Baptist. Luke chapter 1 verses 57 through 80. When it was time for Elizabeth to have her baby, she gave birth to a son. Her neighbors and relatives heard that the Lord had shown her great mercy, and they shared her joy.

    On the eighth day, they came to circumcise the child, and they were going to name him after his father, Zechariah. But his mother spoke up and said, no, he is to be called John. They said to her, there’s no one among your relatives who has that name. So they made signs to his father to find out what he would like to name the child. He asked for a writing tablet, and to everyone’s astonishment, he wrote, his name is John.

    Immediately his mouth was opened and his tongue was loosed and he began to speak, praising God. The neighbors were filled with awe. And throughout the hill country of Judea, people were talking about all these things. Everyone who heard this wondered about it, asking, what then is this child going to be?

    For the Lord’s hand was with him. His father Zechariah was filled with the Holy Spirit and prophesied. Praise be to the Lord, the God of Israel, because He has come and redeemed His people. He has raised up a horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David, as he said long ago through his holy prophets, salvation from our enemies and from the hand of all who hate us, to show mercy to our fathers and to remember his holy covenant, the oath he swore to our father Abraham, to rescue us from the hand of our enemies and to enable us to serve him without fear, with holiness and righteousness before him all our days. And you, my child, will be called prophet of the Most High. For you will go on before the Lord to prepare the way for him, to give his people the knowledge of salvation through the forgiveness of their sins, because of the tender mercy of our God, by which the rising sun will come to us from heaven, to shine on those living in darkness and in the shadow of death, and to guide our feet into the path of peace. and the child grew and became strong in spirit and he lived in the desert until he appeared publicly to Israel. The word of the Lord for the people of the Lord. Thanks be to God.

    It is an odd and blessed thing that a great deal of Old Testament prophecy is actually about a figure that we often consider minor, not now one of the minor prophets, but John the Baptist. The New Testament gives attention to him mainly in the Gospel of Luke. There we have the long story of his birth. The other Gospels give briefer attention, but all four present him as the forerunner. who fulfills prophecy, and the two best-known prophecies, maybe they’re very well-known partly because of Handel’s Messiah, but the two best-known prophecies are that one from Isaiah 40, a voice preaching in the desert, prepare the way of the Lord, make straight in the desert a highway for our God. There’s a text quoted by John in his preaching in the desert. Mark chapter one, Matthew chapter three, the gospel of Luke, they all do it.

    And also that prediction from Malachi chapter 3 and from chapter 4, behold I’m going to send you my messenger, Malachi 3.1. And in fact the word Malachi itself means my messenger. The name of the prophet, or the name of the book at least, matches the name in chapter 3 of that book, verse 1. I’m going to send my messenger who will prepare the way.

    And then the Lord whom you seek will suddenly come to his temple. Malachi 3. And by the very end of that book, again the prediction reasserted that before the great and terrible day of the Lord, I’m going to send you Elijah the prophet who will restore the hearts of the fathers to the children and the children to the fathers, lest I come and smite the land with a curse. That last word of Malachi is the word curse. For you Bible students at Geneva, you might recognize the word harem. One of the more terrifying words in the Old Testament. And Jericho put upon the ban of Sarum, devoted to destruction. A terrifying word.

    And so in rabbinic liturgy, the previous clause is then repeated in the reading of that passage. Behold, I’m going to send you Elijah the prophet. The reading ends with that. Elijah the prophet. And since this is the end of the reading of all the prophets in synagogue liturgy, the congregation then shouts, Chazak, be strong. You do that when you finish Torah, Chazak, be strong. You do that when you finish the prophets, Chazak, be strong.

    And you do that when you finish the writings, the three great divisions of the Hebrew Bible, which correspond exactly to our books, but in a different order. All right, Chazak, three times. We have it for Joshua 1. We have it for Malachi 1, the threefold Chazak. The exhortation to be strong and courageous for the Lord your God is with you. All right, so Elijah the prophet coming.

    And in the New Testament we learn that this Elijah is actually not literally Elijah, though the crowds wonder whether that is true. And the particular child of Herod the Great who beheads John the Baptist wonders whether Jesus is in fact John the Baptist come back from the dead. Okay, all kinds of superstitious opinions are out there in that ancient world of first century Palestine.

    And when John is asked by the Pharisees, by emissaries from the Pharisees, are you Elijah? I am not, he says. Well, who are you then? on a voice, crying in the desert, prepare the way of the Lord, make straight His paths. That is a cry for repentance, yes, even to the Pharisees who seemed to be so meticulous in the way they obeyed, but they were not.

    And so we find then in the words of Jesus this astonishing statement, that if you can accept it, He is the Elijah who was to come. What does that sentence mean, if you can accept it? It seems to mean this. If you can bend your foolish rule of hyper-literalism, all right, he is an Elijah literally. But if you can bend your rule of hyper-literalism, which is not the way to approach the Bible, well, sometimes, sometimes not. But if you can bend that rule, he is the Elijah who was to come. And so our Lord Jesus Christ teaches us that we are to receive John the Baptist as the Elijah of the prophecy.

    And Jesus goes on to say, what did you go out to the desert to see? A wreath swayed by the wind? A man dressed in fine clothes? No, those who wear fine clothes appear in king’s palaces. What did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes! And I’m more than a prophet. This is the one about whom it is written, I send my messenger ahead of you who prepare your way before you.

    Malachi 3.1. And the very next sentence is astonishing.

    Truly I tell you, among those born of women, there has not arisen anyone greater than John the Baptist. John the Baptist, the greatest of all those born up to that point. Well, okay, there is one greater, and we know his name. And then Jesus finishes that sentence with this, yet whoever is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he. That’s another astonishment.

    To be least in the kingdom of heaven is to be the least of all Christians. and yet greater than John? The teaching seems to be this, that John is the greatest of all the Old Testament saints. And John, in fact, is presented by the New Testament as something like the end of the Old Testament, oddly enough, even though his story is told in Matthew and Mark and Luke and John, and again the book of Acts a little bit. All right, there is his story in New Testament texts, but he’s presented as the greatest of the Old greater than Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel.

    It’s astonishing. And if you’re willing to accept it, Matthew 11 verse 14, He is the Elijah who was to come. Whoever has ears, let him hear. Yet, whoever is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he. Astonishing statement. That is, by virtue of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, The greater, deeper, more powerful spirituality is upon us, and the New Testament calls it the Kingdom of Heaven. Not that it was absent before, no, no, no. But now present in a far more powerful and intimate way.

    And so, yes, the Elijah who was to come to prepare the way for a new and wonderful achievement in the redemption of the world. The disciples ask, why do the teachers of the law say that Elijah must come first? And Jesus answers, to be sure, Elijah comes and will restore all things. That sounds like still future, but the very next sentence is this. But I tell you, Elijah has already come.

    And they did not recognize him. but have done to him everything they wished, in the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer out their hands, then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them of John the Baptist.” Who is this character? John’s Gospel says he came as a witness to testify of the light. John’s Gospel says he was a bright and shining light. And as we read the whole story of John, we see in Luke 1, verse 5, that his parents are priests.

    His father, Zechariah, struck dumb. I didn’t read that part of the story, but struck dumb while in the sanctuary of the temple doing his rotation duty as one of the priests of Israel. And there were so many priests in that time that they had to cast lots to see who would serve in the temple on a particular day. And at last, after years of waiting, it seems, Zechariah, the priest, gets to serve. And while there, at the altar of incense, inside the holy place, the angel Gabriel appears and predicts the birth of a son. And Zechariah, the prophet, hardly believes it.

    How can this happen? We’re old. Elizabeth, she’s old. How can this happen? You’ve got to be kidding me. All right, you’re going to be struck dumb, says the angel. Until these things are fulfilled. And by the way, the boy’s going to be called John. John. Notice how the neighbors respond to the name. Nobody in your family has ever been called that. And here’s one of the weirder features of our story. Can you tell I like the weird features of Bible stories? Okay. Yeah. All right. So here’s one of the weird features of Bible stories.

    Priestly families tended to name their kids after the grandfather, which meant you had three generations of, you know, rotation of names. And yeah, you get the name back. So here we have a priest named Zechariah, who’s the father of, well, nobody in the family line ever had that name. Ah, you can’t name him that. You’re a priest, right? You can’t do that. But Elizabeth says, no, his name is John. And the neighbors say, all right, well, let’s ask the daddy. And into their astonishment, Zechariah writes out, his name is John.

    In Hebrew, Yochanan, Yahweh has shown grace. Pretty good name for the forerunner, eh? Because Christ is incarnate grace, the greatest expression of grace in all the history of the world. God incarnate, God in flesh, Immanuel. And so the one who announces such grace, how else could he be named? But Yohanan, Yahweh has shown grace.

    And this also raises the question whether a priest named Zechariah might be even descended from a much earlier priest named Zechariah, namely Zechariah the prophet, who is a priest in Jerusalem, and whose grandfather, Ido, was one of the 12 chief priests at the time the temple was rebuilt. And in the very next generation of time, when we see another list of chief priests, the 12 of them, Zechariah the prophet’s name is on that list too. Nehemiah chapter 12. Now that’s speculation, but could it be, could it be that Zechariah the prophet is the great, great, great, great, great, great, whatever, grandfather of this Zechariah, the father of John?

    We don’t know, of course, but the habit of priestly naming is traceable over many, many generations. And I’ve even read the doctoral dissertation that demonstrates it. Not one of the more exciting books in the world. That’s certainly true. Notice what else then about John. Okay, we see then that he’s a priest. John is a priest. And you may know that in the book of Leviticus, one of the duties of priests was to oversee the ritual washings that guaranteed ritual purity or kosher purity for tabernacle and later for temple and for all of Jewish life.

    If you violated ritual purity, you were temporarily cast out of the worshiping congregation. You could not go to tabernacle or later temple. And when ritual purity was restored, then okay, you’re back in. And the principal way of restoring ritual purity was by washings. And if any particular object was defiled, say by blood or excrement or various other substances in the mortal world, all right, you wash the object. And when the sun went down, the new ritual day begins, and the object now is ritually pure. A person who’s defiled, maybe they have to wait a certain number of days, but then they wash, and when the sun goes down, the new ritual day, the day at the time of the evening sacrifice, the person is now ritually clean.

    And these washings were overseen by the priest and the Levites. Baptism by John. is certainly rooted in the ancient customs taught by Moses of ritual washing. Certainly so. And so we see that in his work of baptism, John is being something like a super priest.

    And he’s proclaiming that even good kosher Israelites must be washed for the forgiveness of sins. and repent of sins in preparation for the coming of the one who is grace incarnate, the Emmanuel, the Christ, who comes in the aftermath of the announcements of this Elijah, not Elijah literally back from the dead, but Elijah, the spirit and power of Elijah, now inhabiting John the Baptist, the son of a priest, the son whose mother was also a descendant of Aaron. as Luke 1.5 tells us. We see more about this man.

    Luke 1.14, you’re going to have a son, and you’re going to call him John, and he will be a joy and a delight to you, and many will rejoice because of his birth.

    You parents in the room, you know what that’s like. You rejoice at the birth of a child. You rejoice. But usually that joy is limited to friends and family. Nobody else pays a whole lot of attention. Friends and family, they do. But notice what this text says. Many will rejoice. And, verse 15. He will be great in the sight of the Lord. Not many are called that. Abraham gets that. David gets that. Jesus gets it big time, of course. He’ll be great in the sight of the Lord.

    And then we have this strange provision often overlooked about John. He is never to take wine or any other fermented drink. That’s the law of the Nazarites. Remember the Nazarites? Forbidden to cut their hair lifelong. Samson, okay. Samuel is under that rule as well, from birth. Lifelong Nazarites. Not every Nazarite was lifelong. Most were not. Usually a temporary vow. But during the time of the vow, Paul was under the vow for a while, a couple of weeks or months. Under that vow, you do not touch a dead body. You do not have anything fermented. No wine, no raisin cakes, nothing that might have alcoholic fermentation in it. And so John is never to have wine or fermented drink.

    That’s a Nazarite rule. So we see then that he is not just a priest, he’s a super-priest. Because Nazarite rules were to render the laity as pure as priests. And we see that he is in the spirit and power of Elijah, verse 17, to turn the hearts of the parents of their children and the disobedient to the wisdom of the righteous, to make ready a people prepared for the Lord. That’s prophetic work. So John is priest and Nazarite and prophet all at once. And Jesus will say that he is, of all those born of women, none greater than John. Now I needed to ask a question and I forgot to ask it. Do you have the handout? Steve, did you give them the handout? Okay, they’ve got the handout. Okay, so where am I on this page? Nowhere yet. Okay.

    So in our Zechariah now, how does this tie in? It is one of the more difficult things to discover in the Bible, but it is fact that Zechariah chapter 6 anticipates John the Baptist. Nearly every serious reader of the Bible understands that John is anticipated by Isaiah 40 because he quotes the vines. In the desert, make way. makes straight his path, the way of the Lord, a highway for our God. Nearly every serious reader of the Bible understands that Malachi 3 is in anticipation of John the Baptist. Okay, I’m going to send my messenger who prepares the way before you. Both those texts quoted persistently by the New Testament Gospels. What is not well known, and I will confess I did not know this until about 10 years ago, what is not well known is that Zechariah 6 likewise anticipates John the Baptist.

    Now, in translating this text, I found that it’s one of the most difficult texts to translate in all the Old Testament. I’ve taught Bible translation for, let’s see, 29 years. That’s a long time. I learned Hebrew when I was 19. I’m 64. That’s a long time. I’ve worked with these texts for a long time, and there is scarcely a text more difficult to translate than Zechariah 6, verses 9 through 15.

    And as we approach this text, we see that this is at the very end of the night visions. I have preached most of those night visions to you over the last several months. Everything from Zechariah 1, verse 7, the angelic horseman, the first of the visions pronouncing peace, in the world and therefore the right time to restore Jerusalem and its temple all the way down to the woman in the basket and the flying scroll. And today we read the eighth of the visions, the angelic chariots.

    And the point of that is that the time of wrath is over. God’s spirit of anger, anger at the nations, anger at his own people, has been appeased in the land of the north from which invasions had always come. Babylonians came from the land of the north around the fertile crescent to attack Jerusalem and Judah. That north country is now pacified. My spirit is now at rest in the land of the north. Zechariah 8.

    And so the time of restoration is here. 519 BC, time to build the temple, and they’re building it. Time to reestablish the institutions taught by Moses, and they’re doing it. Time to rebuild the city, and it’s being rebuilt. And in that circumstance, we then close the sequence of night visions with an extraordinary event in Jerusalem, the making of crowns and a public coronation. Verse 10, take silver and gold from the exiles, Haldai, Tavai, Tedai, who have arrived from Babylon. These are Jews bringing the tribute of wealthy Jews, and maybe middle class ones too, in Babylon, bringing their wealth and offering to the newly building temple there in Jerusalem. Solomons have been gilded in gold. Herods, they would be covered, whole sheets of gold over the walls. It was astonishing. This temple has almost none. In fact, I would say this temple has none up to this point.

    And these exiles return from Babylon bringing the offerings of the exiled Jews, those who have not come home. And they bring silver and gold. So go on that same day, when these people arrive, go to the house of Josiah, son of Zephaniah, and make crowns. Perhaps this Josiah is a metal worker, maybe he’s a goldsmith, we do not know. But somehow the house of Josiah becomes the place where such things are made. And our translations now have difficulties with verse 11. Make a crown? That’s what the NIV says. Make crowns, that’s the King James Version. Make an ornate crown, that’s the New American Standard. Make crowns, that’s the Anchor Bible. Make a crown, that’s the New American Bible.

    And we have translational disarray. Partly because of the over-willingness of people to amend the Hebrew text. Now for those who know a little bit of Hebrew, that’s a few of you, you know that is the feminine plural ending. How many have had Hebrew in my classroom?

    So a few hands going up. Okay, so ot, feminine plural ending. Ateret, crown, or ata, crown. Aterot is the word here. It’s a plural. Now maybe it’s a double crown, so the New American Standard guesses an ornate crown. Okay, a hyper elaborate crown could be one in plural, and the kings of Egypt wore a double crown. The crown of Upper Egypt and of Lower, symbolizing the union of two competing realms in about 3000 BC, and so Pharaoh’s crown is a double crown. Is that what’s in view here?

    No. And I think clearly the New American Standard is wrong. King James crowns. That’s right. That’s the word. NIV amends the text, changes the vows. Okay, that’s possible. You can do that. Because sometimes the scribes don’t get it right. That’s sometimes true. And by close comparison of text with text, ancient versions, Dead Sea Scrolls in Hebrew, various considerations like this, sometimes we are bold to follow a manuscript that’s not the majority or the rabbinic standard. All right, sometimes we do this. We do it with great care. with pious devotion, sometimes with fear and trembling.

    The United did it. Make a crown. I’ve done it in various texts. I’m not going to blame the translators as disloyal. No, they’re strong inerrantists. They love God. They love the Bible. They assert the inerrancy of the text. In their judgment, they think it’s aterit, a singular noun. Not impossible. But notice by verse 14 that there shall be a covenant of peace between the two of them. The two of whom?

    Well, it seems that there are two crown figures. One will be the future king, the branch, a title associated with David’s descendants. The other shall be a future priest, a descendant of Aaron. And so in my reading of the text, I’m convinced reasonably, okay, maybe not unshakably, but reasonably, that there are two crowns. One is to be a priestly crown, and one is to be a royal crown. And notice what happens in the text. One crown, verse 14, will be given to Heldah, Tobiah, Jediah, and Henn, the son of Zephaniah, to be placed as a memorial, a remembrance, in the temple of the Lord. What happens to the crown?

    Verse 11, set it on the head of the high priest, Joshua. It seems that we have this scenario, that Joshua, the high priest of that time is going to be crowned, maybe in silver. Because he’s functioning as high priest in that time, and he’s the gift of God to them. And in chapter three, we saw that he was ordained by heaven and given in heavenly vision, an ornate crown. Put a clean turban on his head. says Zechariah the prophet. So they put a clean turban on his head. Zechariah 3 around verse 5 or 6. Alright, so there is Joshua the High Priest crowned in the vision of chapter 3 and crowned here in a ceremony in the streets of Jerusalem, I’m sorry, in the public square of Jerusalem in Zechariah 6. But there’s a peace, there’s peace between the two of them. Who are the two? It seems necessary that there are two crowns, two thrones, and two figures.

    And so I anticipate this in the text. That there is one crown there upon the head of Joshua signifying his current role 519 BC as the spiritual leader and high priest of the people. But the branch That man is future. And so the other crown is held on reserve as a remembrance in the temple of the Lord. It is a sign of things to come. What things to come? The sign that the branch of David, the righteous branch is going to come and that crown announces the certainty of the coming. That is, In future, there is a future priest and a future Davidic king. Now, why do I think the future priest is actually John the Baptist? Have you figured out that’s where I’m going with this? John the Baptist? Here it is.

    The word branch, zemach in Hebrew, is translated anatole in Greek. Anatole is a new sprig of growth out of the ground. And so David’s trunk has been cut off, the trunk of David’s tree, the root of Jesse is still alive, but the tree has been cut. That was the end of the dynasty’s rule in Jerusalem in 587. No Davidic kings upon the throne thereafter. The line of David, though, survived because God had promised that there would always be a man from the line of David. There would always be one, always be a successor. And so out of that growth ring of the living tree, though the tree is cut off, a new trunk begins to grow and in Hebrew we call that Tzemach.

    In Greek you call that Anatole. Uprising. And uprising is also the word for sunrise. Anatole. It’s also the word for east and sunrise and so Turkey is Anatolia from the Greek point of view. The land of sunrise. Turn now to Luke chapter 1 and the song of Zechariah the prophet.

    And hiding there in the Greek, though not in English, not clear in English, is the link, which I only discovered about 10 years ago. Look at Luke 1, 76 and following. You, my child, shall be called prophet of the Most High, for you will go on before the Lord to prepare the way for him. All right, preparing the way, that’s Isaiah 40. That’s Malachi 3, verses 1 and 2.

    To give His people the knowledge of salvation through the forgiveness of their sins because of the tender mercy of our God by which the rising sun, the Anatole, will come from heaven. Zechariah’s hearers would have heard that in Hebrew or in Aramaic. And it would have been the word Zemach. in their hearing, the uprising, the rising sun to shine upon those living in darkness and the shadow of death to guide our feet into the path of peace. Hence our text in Zechariah anticipates John the Baptist, the priest who was more than priest, the prophet who was more than prophet, the Nazarite who was more than Nazarite, the Elijah who was to come, the greatest of all those born of woman, And so by prophetic figure, two crowns made in Jerusalem, anticipating the messianic future, the forerunner, like a priest, yes, a priest, and the messianic king, the branch of David.

    And notice what is said then in that time, there’ll be harmony between the two of them, peace. And verse 15, Zechariah 6, Those who are far away will come and help to build the temple of the Lord.” Now, wait a minute. In Zechariah’s own time, they’re building the temple. And they’re going to finish it.

    Chapter 3 said that the governor, Zerubbabel, his hands have founded this temple, his hands will complete it. But this governor is not the zemach, the branch, the branch who is yet to come. He is the ancestor of the branch. He’s named in Matthew one as one of the ancestors of Jesus. He is not the branch.

    And so the temple that shall be built in verse 15 by those in future who come from far away is not the literal temple of stone and mortar and timber and brick, whatever it may be. It’s the spiritual temple of the church of Jesus. And Peter tells us that we are being built a spiritual temple. And that we are living stones.

    And so we see in this very strange text then, surprises and richness and wonders. Surprise. That such a text as obscure as this should anticipate someone so well known to us as John. For two. the richness of Holy Scripture that anticipates in surprising ways out of the darkness of weird things in Hebrew and a song by a priest who has been struck dumb in the temple, that out of these things comes the glory and the certainty that the gospel is true and that things have been fulfilled by ancient prophecy. and are to be received by us as matters of joy and confidence in what God has done.

    John comes not by merely the power of man. Parents old pastime, like Abraham and Sarah. Jesus himself, born of a virgin. These things are not by the power of any human person. They come by the will of God alone. And so we rejoice in the good things that God has done. And we see that the whole Bible gives one message. And even a strange, strange text like Zechariah 6, the hardest text I’ve ever had to figure out to translate, preaches gospel.

    And so what is history? Well, the old joke is that it’s his story, history, his story. And Jesus said, this is the last several lines on that page you’ve got, that salvation is from the Jews. That is, Jewish history is the source of Christian gospel. and what God did with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and Sarah, and Rachel, and Rebecca, and Leah, and down to the time of Joshua, the high priest, and his priestly colleagues, and Zechariah, the prophet, 519 BC, that even these things are foundation stones to the Christian gospel, and that redemptive history is the foremost thing upon the mind of God.

    And one glorious thread laces all the Bible, the story of redemption, and even such a tiny thing as this, the making of crowns, a sign of gospel. You might ask what happened to those crowns. Notice the last line of text. All this will happen if you diligently obey the Lord your God. Was Judah, was Jerusalem diligently obedient for all that waiting time of 400, 500 years? No, they were not.

    And in the days of the Maccabees, the terrifying, paganizing king named Antiochus IV, the Greek, rode 170 BC, 175 BC to 164 BC. Antiochus was desperate for gold because he had to pay 12,000 talents of it to the Romans every year. His troops then went raiding the temple treasuries of everyone under their own, under their rule, including Jerusalem. And so they come to Jerusalem and they take the wealth they can. And there’s a separate sentence in first Maccabees that says this, the often overlook quote, and they took the crowns.

    What crowns? Nobody knows for sure. But I think it’s these two crowns. All right, this will happen if you diligently obey the Lord your God. There’s a conditionality there. All right, so some things did not survive the ordeals of disobedience and invasion. All right.

    But is it nonetheless true that God would send his future priest, John, to wash Israel’s sins by baptism and the Messiah who must come to his temple and redeem the world. And so our stories, weak and paltry though they are, gain the deepest meaning when we trust this Jesus Christ who is that golden thread that links all of history together into one story. And as ancient Israel, ancient Judah awaited the time of fulfillment, 500 BC, 500 years of waiting. So we await the return of Christ, confident that he will come. He will. Even so, come Lord Jesus. Shall we pray?

    Lord Jesus Christ, Yes, even through obscure and difficult texts you speak to us. So grant us then confidence that you rule not just the world, but our very lives. And that nothing can happen to us apart from your good pleasure and will. And that all things indeed work together for the good of those who love you. So bless us then in this time of, um, for many churches per Advent, for many of the thoughts of Christmas and incarnation, but bless us on this Lord’s day, that it might be truly the Lord’s day in our heart and mind and speech and action. And they might, we might reverence you then all the more deeply and ardently because of the confidence you build in us by your word and spirit.

    And may we do the deed that John the Baptist so ardently proclaimed. to prepare the way for the Lord, to make straight His paths, and to shine light into the dark places of the earth, the light of the gospel of Jesus Christ, our only Savior. In your name we pray it, Lord Jesus. Amen. The hymn is Christ Whose Glory Fills the Skies, number 330.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • Lost and Found

    Lost and Found

    About this sermon

    Tax collectors and sinners drew near to Jesus, and the Pharisees grumbled that he received sinners and ate with them. Jesus answered with the parables of the lost sheep and the lost coin, in which the owner searches until he finds what was lost and calls others to rejoice. Heaven rejoices over one sinner who repents, and the church shares the Good Shepherd’s heart as it proclaims the gospel to all people.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    This evening we are going to be in the gospel according to Luke chapter 15 We will be looking at verses 1 through 10 To remind you this comes after a section in which Jesus has been teaching about many things including hospitality he has received hospitality and he is also teaching about God’s hospitality and And he’s going to tell a story here.

    Now he’s going to tell a story that involves somebody that has a profession that today we perhaps have a romanticized view of. But if someone were to tell you a story that involved, say, a pig farmer. I grew up on a pig farm, so I can say that. Or a sewer worker. Perhaps we would think of something that is not a profession we would necessarily want to associate with, have, or perhaps even have in social polite society. Well, that was the context for this parable he tells of a shepherd. But the Pharisees, we’ll see in the beginning of this passage, are starting to grumble about Jesus’ teaching about hospitality. And so to illustrate good hospitality, he uses somebody that they would never associate with.

    And let’s look at this passage to see just what Jesus is teaching us, what our Lord is teaching us in this section. But first, let’s go to the Lord in prayer. Would you pray with me? Heavenly Father, Lord, we thank you for the day that you’ve given to us. We thank you for the Lord’s day and time to rest in the work of Christ. We pray that this word that has been inspired by your Holy Spirit would also have the Spirit accompanying it this evening as it is read and expounded may The Spirit who superintended these words also write them on our hearts, that we might love them and walk in them by His power. And so, Lord, we pray that you would illuminate this text for us this evening in the name of the one who sent the Spirit, Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior. Amen. Luke chapter 15, beginning in verse 1, we will read until verse 10.

    Now the tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to hear him. And the Pharisees and the scribes grumbled, saying, This man receives sinners and eats with them. So he told them this parable. What man of you, having a hundred sheep, if he has lost one of them, does not leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the one that is lost? until he finds it. And when he has found it, he lays it on his shoulders rejoicing. And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors saying to them, rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep that was lost.

    Just so I tell you, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over 99 righteous persons who need no repentance. Or what woman, having ten silver coins, if she loses one coin, does not light a lamp and sweep the house and seek diligently until she finds it? And when she has found it, she calls together her friends and neighbors, saying, Rejoice with me, for I have found the coin that I have lost. Just so, I tell you, there is joy before the angels of God. over one sinner who repents.

    The grass may wither and the flower may fade, but this the word of our Lord endures forever.” I want us to look at this passage this evening in three different parts and what it is that Jesus is teaching us about his attitude towards the lost and what we should learn about that from his teaching. So we’re going to look at this in three parts beginning with the first two verses and I think what frames these first two verses is I was delighted to discover that your version of the Trinity Hymnal has the hymn in it, There Were Ninety and Nine. That hymn begins this way.

    It says, There were ninety and nine that safely lay in the shelter of the fold, but one was out on the hills away, far off from the gates of gold, away on the mountains wild and bare, away from the tender shepherd’s care. What is our attitude towards the lost and the wandering sheath? That is really the question if you are reading through Luke that occupies all of chapter 15. What is the attitude? that God has and also that we should have towards the lost.

    This chapter begins with the Pharisees grumbling about Jesus and his actions that Jesus talks to, receives, associates, even eats with sinners. Eats with sinners is the phrase that was used there. It means Jesus was not only willing to receive hospitality from the Pharisees. He did that in chapter 14. But he would be willing to receive hospitality from people like Levi, the tax collector, from sinners, from people they would not associate with. You see, table fellowship, who you would eat with, was a big deal in those days. And many of the Pharisees based this off of their understanding of the Old Testament.

    If you look at Daniel, they would look at a story such as Daniel in Chapter 1, and the fact that they would not eat from the king’s table, and they took that as a principle that you should not eat with anyone that is not in their status, whether they are Jews or not to eat with Gentiles.

    In fact, they would expand that to say you shouldn’t even eat with anybody that can’t go into the inner courts of the temple, the lame or disabled or diseased. Now, If you read Daniel 1, what in reality is happening there is not a disassociation that they would never have table fellowship with a sinner. What’s happening there is also not some sort of a special diet that you can try to. What is happening there is likely what was on the table were things that were forbidden for them to eat in their dietary standards that they were given. It would be a violation of the Mosaic Covenant, so they didn’t eat those things.

    But the Pharisees took that as a principle that you should not eat with anybody that wouldn’t be included in the inner courts of the temple. Now, neglected, of course, by the Pharisees might have been another story that you can find in the Old Testament.

    If we remember from 2 Samuel 9, where David receives who at his table? Someone from the house of Saul, Mephibosheth. He receives him, even though, if you remember, he was lame. He was disabled. Perhaps he could not come into the inner courts of the temple, but he was welcome at the king’s table. In fact, that’s why he invited him. He wanted to find somebody to show grace and kindness to that wasn’t in his house, but in Saul’s house. So maybe the Pharisees didn’t have that text in their Bible, but we can never know. Jesus knows that they’re grumbling about this though. They’re grumbling about who he would share a table with, who he would socialize with.

    Not just any sinners, but notorious sinners, those who were known for being women of the night, and even worse, IRS agents. Tax collectors, right? I knew a man in a PCA church once that he loved to joke around that when he introduced himself and you asked what he did, he said, well, sometimes if what he really did was he was an IRS agent, but if he didn’t want to be thought badly of in polite society, he would tell them he was a drug dealer. Well, today, that’s something of a joke, but in that day, tax collectors were known to be thieves, right? You really did not want to associate with them, not just because you didn’t like paying taxes, but because you know they stole from you.

    And the attitude of the Pharisees is, that is a class of people we want nothing to do with. We don’t want to talk to them. We want them far off, right? We don’t want them in our synagogues. We don’t want them in our temple. We don’t want them in our house at our table.

    In fact, there was a way of speaking of those who were in and those who were out in those days that you see in scripture, in Ezekiel 22 or in Acts 2, where they would identify those who were near and those who were far off. It was a way of speaking. Peter even uses it, that the promises for those who are near And those who are far off were those that are in the house of Israel, but also those that are Gentiles outside. But the Pharisees turned this into a literal principle that they would do.

    They were far off and they want to keep them there. It reminds me of that line from The Fiddler on the Roof, right? When they asked the rabbi if he has a blessing for the Tsar, and he says, yes, may the Lord bless and keep the Tsar far away from us. He wants them far away. But what does that attitude do? The attitude basically says, we want them far away, we want them cursed, and we want them to stay that way. They want them to stay far off. That’s what the Pharisees did by their actions. Bless and keep them far away from us. Now let me be clear.

    The difference here with Jesus is that he ate with sinners, but he did not sin with sinners. Jesus was in the presence of those who stole, tax collectors, those who acted immorally, those who had bad reputations, but Jesus never stole or acted in those immoral ways. As Jesus was said to have in Luke 7, Jesus drank wine, but he was never drunk with the drunkards. Jesus ate with sinners, but he never sinned with sinners.

    And we need to keep that straight. That’s what’s happening here. He is in table fellowship, he is eating with, he’s receiving hospitality with people, but he is not joining in to their lifestyle. And if you look at the last few verses of chapter 14, that was important to understand. Salt should not lose its saltiness, right? Jesus came to justify sinners, not to justify sin. Here’s the real contrast. Not that Jesus joined in with sinners, but that he did not reject the lost as others did. He did not keep them far away from himself. He was distinct and yet was around them.

    In some ways, Luke 15 continues the teaching on hospitality that Jesus began in Luke 14. The Christian life involves this hospitality for evangelism. It is the means that Jesus often is using to reach the lost. And it’s often the thing that we neglect the most, isn’t it? Hospitality in our culture is something that has fallen by the wayside. How often do we have someone at our dinner table that’s not our immediate family, and if not our immediate family, somebody that is lost, that is coming in and observing our Christian home, that is hearing us pray, that is involved in our conversation, that at some point will lead to conversations about the things of God. Not so that they can invite us into their lifestyle, but so that we can invite them to commune with Christ.

    And so the parable that Jesus tells here in verses three to seven is a second section we’ll look at. This is a parable about seeking the lost. You see, Jesus is in the business not of rejecting or keeping the lost far away, but seeking them. If you look at those verses, it brings to mind another verse from there were 99 that reads this.

    Lord, thou hast here thy ninety and nine. Are they not enough for thee? But the shepherd made answer, this of mine has wandered away from me. And although the road be rough and steep, I go to the desert to find my sheep.” He has a story about a parable of the shepherd leaving the 99 to seek the lost sheep. And why would he do that? There’s a question that seems to be there. Why would you leave the good 99 there and leave and go seek the one that has wandered off?

    Because there’s a difference here in the Pharisees’ attitude towards the lost, which is rejection, shunning them completely, and Jesus’ attitude towards the lost, which is pursuit. Not to follow them, but to lead them home. Not to just love them where they are, but to lead them to where he is so that where he is, they may be also.

    And the image of sheep here is important. Sheep are, you probably know, creatures that are stubborn, creatures of habit. Some call them dumb, but let’s just call them slow learners. I’ve been reading a little bit about shepherds and their take on Psalm 23, and the one thing that I see coming up so many different times is sheep have one-track minds. They see grass, they like grass, and they go to grass. That’s really the thought process of a sheep.

    The fact that the grass might be on the side of a cliff doesn’t deter them. The fact that it’s on the other side of the fence, not in the shepherd’s pasture, that doesn’t deter them either. They just say, hey, there’s some grass. I like grass. Why don’t I go eat that grass?

    And you know that’s a pretty good description of how the human heart often works, right? There’s some pleasure over there. I like pleasure. I’m going to pursue that. Even though it might be on the cliff of a slavery to lust. Even if it might be in the thorns of addiction. The human heart is desperately evil and wants to go after the things that it wants to go after.

    Our heart often is not much smarter than a sheep. Even if those things are not in the shepherd’s pasture, we go in and go after them. Never thinking, you know, maybe there’s a purpose for the shepherd keeping us here. Maybe there’s a purpose in the shepherd’s fence.

    The next verse of there were 99 says, but none of the ransom ever knew how deep were the waters crossed. How dark was the night that the Lord passed through, ere he found his sheep that was lost. Out in the desert, he heard its cry to sick and helpless and ready to die. The hymn kind of reads a little bit between the lines of what’s going on in the story.

    What we hear from scripture is that there were 99 in the open country. And he was to go after the one that is lost until he finds it. And when he has found it, what was read into when he has found it there, right? When he has found it, what does he do? He lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing. And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors saying to them, rejoice with me. I found my sheep.

    We are given the picture though, that the station of the sheep was desperate. left to its own devices, it was not going to find the pasture again. And there’s a sense in which the Pharisees say, let him die. That’s what they say to the lost when they don’t go after them, when they don’t pursue them, when they don’t want them anywhere near their group. Look at the difference in reaction than between the Pharisees who sneer at sinners that are in their presence versus the shepherd’s response of joy in finding that sheep or the woman’s response of joy when she finds the coin. There’s an attitude there, especially see that in the last section that goes along with this parable of joy in finding the lost.

    If you look at 8 to 10 there, the story of the woman Having 10 silver coins, she loses one, and she desperately looks for that coin, doesn’t she? Now, I don’t know what the value of these coins were. I don’t know if you’ve ever had the experience of dropping a penny, looking down and saying, I don’t know if that’s even worth bending over to pick up. But all she has here are these 10 silver coins. This might have been her dowry. This was a tenth of what she had. And if you had 10 $100 bills and you lost one, you’re probably going to go looking for that $100 bill, aren’t you?

    And when she finds it, there’s communicated here such joy in finding it, such relief, that what happens? She calls her friends and neighbors over. The Greek here is the cases in feminine. So this is as if she’s calling all of her girlfriends over for a girls’ night in party that I have found the coin that I lost. She has to celebrate.

    And we’re told there in verse 10, just so I tell you that there is more, there is joy before the angels of God over one sinner who repents. There’s gladness. There is joy. Rejoice. He has found his sheep. Rejoice. He has found the one who was lost. There is a party in a sense in heaven.

    When the lost come through the door of the church, when the lost confesses their sin, When the lost come into the fold by baptism and by confession of faith, there is a party among the heavenly host. I wonder what their melody is, what their joy is like in those moments. And often that would shame us in our response when we see the lost come to faith. Do we have a joy about that? Do we long to see it to the point of where the lost is found? We want to throw a celebration for it. What is our reaction to the lost and their being found? Our reaction, I think, is determined by who it is that we think we are in this story.

    Because in verse seven, it said something much the same as verse 10, but what did it say? It said, just so I tell you, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over 99 righteous person who need no repentance. struggle with that verse a little bit.

    I do. Are there 99 people on this entire earth right now that don’t need repentance? Jesus has a way of speaking here. He’s done this before back in Luke 5 verses 31 to 32. He said, those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. What was he saying there? Well, the rest of Scripture can give us a clue.

    Romans 3.10 says what? There is none righteous, no, not one. Also, Isaiah 53 6 says, all we like sheep have gone astray. We have turned everyone to his own way. Now, if we’re looking at those words, none and all in those verses, they have very expansive meanings saying that there’s a group of those who are righteous and it includes none.

    That word none means zero. It’s a null set. None. It’s actually not a hard word, right? Sometimes linguistics is hard, this time it’s easy. There is none righteous. When it says, all we like sheep have gone astray, you know what that word all means there? It could mean something different in different contexts, but there it actually means inclusive of every single person, everyone, all.

    So let me ask, are there 99 righteous persons in Jesus’ time or now that do not need to repent? Well, the answer is there’s many more than that that think. that they have no need of repentance. Think that they have no need of a shepherd going out to find them. Jesus has this way of communicating over and over again.

    You think that you’re well, but you’re not. You think that you are righteous, but you are sinners. And if you want me to stop hanging out with sinners, in a sense, he could say, then stop inviting me over to your house. You are the sinners. That is why I’m there at your table, Pharisees, because I’m evangelizing you. That’s why I’m here in the houses of sinners.

    But in a very real sense, the tax collectors, those that were notorious sinners of the day, women of the night, they had an advantage over the Pharisees. What was their advantage? I was just talking at a General Assembly with somebody who was doing prison ministry. And in the work of his prison ministry, he said something that I thought was very telling. He says, often those in prison are better off than us because they often know their guilt while all of us out here think that we are innocent. I think the same thing was going on with the tax collectors and the sinners versus the Pharisees.

    And we have to ask ourselves that in application of this as we read these stories and say, who are we in these parables? Are you a sinner? Now, I’m not talking about your Forensic status as we call it. I’m not talking about in the in the doctrine of justification Of course, if you have faith in Christ, you were declared righteous in before God in the court of heaven But throughout our lives, we still compositionally, constitutionally, what are we?

    We still sin. If you have breath in your lungs, you are still somebody who is prone to sin. You still have indwelling sin. When Luther said that we are both saints and sinners, he meant we are saints in declaration. We are sinners in our constitution. So are you a sinner constitutionally, compositionally? Do you still sin? If the answer to that is yes, can you confess that? More than confessing that, do we believe that? And do we have the humility that comes with understanding that we are a sinner in need of a Savior?

    I heard a story about a visiting preacher visiting a pulpit in Scotland. And after the sermon, the parish minister commented to him that it was a fine sermon, but it was misdirected. When the visiting minister asked what he meant by that, he said, well, that sermon was a gospel sinner. And when he further inquired, well, what was wrong with that? He says, well, gospel sermons are for sinners, implying that’s not what we have here in our congregation. And the visiting minister commented that that was such an unfortunate response, because we all still have need of hearing the good news that there’s forgiveness for sinners.

    You see, when we talk about Jesus as our Savior, as our Good Shepherd, this wasn’t one thing He did once in saving us. It’s not something that was just in our past. It’s something that’s also in our present. He is presently saving us from the power of sin. Not only from the guilt of sin in the past, but from the power of sin now. He will save us from the presence of sin in the future. We still need a Savior and a Good Shepherd that seeks lost sheep.

    You know what the key is to understanding this parable of the 99 and the 1? Here’s the key to it. There really are no 99 that need no repentance. There’s only the lost sheep. And if you think that you’re the 99, then you’re going to be grumbling about the gospel and Jesus seeking the lost sheep, not realizing that you at one point had to be that lost sheep that Jesus went after. You have to answer the question, do we, do we need a savior? Not only from our past guilt of sin, but from our present struggling with sin and from the future to have a, an absence of the presence of sin. Because when you understand that, then you understand verse seven and verse 10, the joy in heaven over one who repents. Until you see that you are the lost sheep there, you’ll never know the joy that comes in seeing a lost person be found by the Good Shepherd.

    What is your attitude towards the lost? Does it resemble the Pharisees who think that they do not need a Savior? Do you dare not have such a one as that in your conversations with them or even at your table in your home? Do you have an attitude towards rejecting the lost? Do you have a Christian home, not to be sheltered from the lost, but to invite the lost in to be found? Do you have a church not to retreat from and condemn the world, but to invite them into the fold of the sheep pen? How do you react to the lost?

    In reading through the section, we can either have a reaction like the Pharisees, who didn’t want any association with them, or one that was like Jesus. that did not find the lost, those that we should join in with, but also didn’t see them as those that were unneeding of the gospel, those that we should go after, those that we have been the objects of Christ pursuing us.

    Just as we sang earlier, Jesus sought me when a stranger, what? Wandering from the fold of God. If we can sing that song, then we can have more of an attitude towards the lost. that Jesus communicates here as well. Would you pray with me? Heavenly Father, Lord, we thank you that when we were wandering, that we, the sheep, had gone astray, that you came after us. That you pursued us. That when we were a stranger wandering from the fold of God, you pursued us.

    Lord, have us have a different attitude towards those that need to hear the gospel. Lord, may we see your work as that which goes and proclaims it to all people, to proclaim the gospel as the Belgic Confession says, promiscuously to all people, that they may hear, that they may be pursued by the Good Shepherd. Lord, we pray that you would give us this attitude and this mind of Christ through the work of your Holy Spirit. And so we pray this all in the name of the one who sent the Spirit, Jesus Christ our Savior. Amen. We’re going to then sing from the hymn that I probably quoted too much, 137. I love this hymn so much and I’m so glad that you have it in your hymnal. We don’t in our church. So would we sing this as our closing hymn?

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • Holy Hospitality

    Holy Hospitality

    About this sermon

    At a Pharisee’s dinner Jesus taught the guests to take the lowest place and taught the host to invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind, who cannot repay. In the parable of the great banquet those first invited made excuses, and the master filled his house with the poor and outcasts. Biblical hospitality is received with humility and given as an act of grace, mirroring God’s invitation to sinners to the wedding feast of the Lamb.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    You may be seated, please. It’s a good choice. That’s one of my favorites too. I’m going to invite you in just a moment to turn to Luke chapter 14. We are going to be reading from Luke chapter 14 starting in verse 7 all the way through verse 24. Our subject tonight is a topic that perhaps is not as in vogue to talk about today and is actually something that I think has probably fallen out of practice in many of our Christian homes, and yet is something that is essential to our faith, something that’s essential to our Christian life, something I might even say is essential to the survival of the church in America today, and that is the topic of hospitality. We’re going to look here at a large section. I’m not going to get to the depths of everything that is here that would take about three or four sermons. However, I would like to highlight some things that Jesus is going to tell us.

    Our Lord is going to instruct us about the practice of hospitality, but first let’s go to Lord in prayer. Would you pray with me? Heavenly father, Lord, we come before you this morning or this evening. And we, we confess that this is your word, that your Holy spirit inspired it to be written down, superintended the words and Lord this morning, we are unable to understand. and unable to apply it without the work of the Holy Spirit as well. So we pray that the Spirit would be giving us illumination of this text, giving us strength in order to apply it and be present in the midst of its reading and proclamation this evening. And this we pray in the name of the one who sent the Spirit, Jesus Christ, our Lord. Amen.

    Luke chapter 14, just to summarize verses one through six, we see that Jesus is in the house of a Pharisee on the Lord’s day, enjoying hospitality. And the question has come up about what it is that you do on the Lord’s day. How do you spend your Lord’s day? What is your time devoted to? And Jesus has taught again, that it is for works of mercy. It is for works of healing. And that is what he has done in the first section here, but he goes on to say this, starting in verse seven. Hear now the word of the Lord.

    Now he told the parable to those who were invited when he noticed how they chose the places of honor, saying to them, when you are invited by someone to a wedding feast, do not sit down in a place of honor, lest someone more distinguished than you be invited by him.

    And he who invited you both will come and say to you, give your place to this person. And then you will begin with shame to take the lower place. But when you are invited, go and sit in the lowest place so that when your host comes, he may say to you, friend, move up higher. Then you will be honored in the presence of all who sit at table with you. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled. And he who humbles himself will be exalted.

    He said also to the man who had invited him, when you give a dinner or a banquet, do you invite your friends or your brothers or do not invite your friends or your brothers or your relatives or rich neighbors, lest they also invite you in return and you must be repaid. But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed because they cannot repay you. for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the just.

    When one of those who reclined at table with him heard these things, he said to him, blessed is everyone who will eat the bread in the kingdom of God. But he said to him, a man once gave a great banquet and invited many. And at the time for the banquet, he sent his servant to say to those who have been invited, come for everything is now ready.

    But they all alike began to make excuses. The first said to him, I have bought a field, and I must go out and see it. Please have me excused. Another said, I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I go to examine them. Please have me excused. And another said, I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come.

    So the servant came and reported these things to his master. Then the master of the house became angry. and said to his servant, go quickly, go out quickly to the streets and the lanes of the city and bring in the poor and the crippled and the blind and the lame. And the servant said, sir, what you have commanded has been done and still there is room. And the master said to the servant, go out to the highways and hedges and compel people to come in that my house may be filled. For I tell you, none of those men who were invited shall taste my banquet.”

    Grass withers and flower fades. This, the word of our Lord, endures forever. Jesus, here in this passage on the Lord’s Day, is enjoying hospitality in the house of a Pharisee, perhaps showing that we don’t merely accept the invitations to hospitality from those that are the ones that we want to spend the most time with and that we like and are most like us.

    Jesus is there in the home, probably between services, between morning worship and evening worship. This is in fact, if you ever read about daily life in Puritan New England, I recently was reading that, and they actually had this as a practice that after morning worship, often beginning around 9am and then ending around lunchtime, they would have houses that would open, the local public house would open and and people would take their picnic lunches in there and they would eat especially if they come out of town or they would go into people’s homes and those in the community would host the ones that are the farmers out in the fields and from lunch onward until evening worship would be a time of open hospitality in everyone’s home. There was of course nothing that was open, no work to attend to, no children’s games to attend, no events No concerts to go to. They gave themselves entirely in that time to discussion of what they had heard in the morning worship. and to other conversation, what they’ve been praying for them about, or other things, other readings of scriptures. And Jesus finds himself in probably a very similar situation in ancient Judea. After the morning worship, he would be in someone’s home that had invited him for hospitality, invite him in.

    And this is how Jesus would spend a part of his Lord’s day receiving But he has some comments on those that are giving hospitality, on how it is that one ought to give hospitality. So in looking at biblical hospitality here, we have three things here to learn and then to apply. And the first thing that we learn in verses 7 to 11 is how we should receive hospitality. And the dominant word here in receiving hospitality is it’s to be received in humility. It is to be received in humility. And this was not how hospitality was received in this day.

    Everybody was very concerned about being honored, being recognized when they walked into the door and when the seats were given out. In fact, this probably was one of the main reasons Jesus was asked in was that he was considered somebody that was notable. And you would see everybody else was jockeying for a position when they were invited in. There was a sense of entitlement. In the midst of hospitality, you were entitled to this. You were entitled to all of this focus. The invitation to hospitality was all about me.

    And Jesus instructs instead to receive hospitality with humility. The whole discussion about not taking the highest place is to display that if you accept hospitality with pride, You may find yourself humiliated. If you exalt yourself, you will be humiliated in the midst of that.

    You will perhaps, you almost have the image of going into a wedding feast and somebody starts to sit at the family table and they’re going, they’re had to be told, no, this is for the family and distinguished guests. You have to go down there. Don’t assume that the place of honor is always for you. Why? Well, hospitality is always to be seen as an act of grace. It’s an act of grace, and so when you receive it, you’re not entitled to it, or else it’s not a grace.

    In fact, we may actually have some struggles with this with ourself. I don’t know your attitude when you go to a cookout, a party, some other sort of gathering. I’ve known some, in fact, struggled with myself with this passage in terms of stewing over people not fussing about me, right? They’re not coming up to me and talking to me. They’re not being hospitable enough. I’ve received the invitation, but they’re not talking to me enough. Is this an attitude that you have, or do you seek out others? Do you actively engage? in that social situation? Or is it just to see who the important people are and just talk to them and leave out everybody else? And that can be hard. I know with myself, I have some introverted tendencies. I don’t know about you, but often in that situation, my pride may not have me seek out the important people, but to go off in the corner by myself and hope that nobody talks to me.

    I used to actually be known for taking books to gatherings. I’d be invited to a cookout when I was in college and I would take a book with me because I preferred to spend that time with myself. That was my pride. Now today, everybody has their phone and they’re tempted to do that too, right? Just to spend time with me. And the whole event is just about whether or not I’m being entertained. It’s not received as an act of grace and received in humility. And Jesus was noticing that in his day. And it is a problem also in our day.

    How do you receive hospitality? And that’s going to be important for the image of hospitality that we see later and what that says about how we understand grace. So the first point that’s to be made here is that hospitality is to be received in humility and gratitude. And this is also because of the second point that he’s going to make, not merely in receiving hospitality, but what is biblical hospitality when it is given?

    And he states here, starting in verse 12, that it’s to be given, not merely to who you know, your family, your friends, but it’s to be given to the needy. Biblical hospitality is a hospitality that should be given to the needy. And then you see there, he gives that in a didactical form, very quick, very simple to understand.

    And then somebody blurts out in verse 15, right? Blessed be the one who eats and drinks, who eats bread in the kingdom of heaven. It’s interesting trying to interpret what was this guy saying here? Was he agreeing with Jesus? Was he being sarcastic about the people that were enjoying that feast that it’s not people he’d want to be around? Was he trying to change the subject because Jesus had started talking about this and it had become very awkward? All sorts of thoughts are put there. But what you see is Jesus doesn’t stop in this teaching. He doesn’t change the subject. He actually illustrates it with a parable. What he says didactically in 12 to 14, he now will illustrate with a parable.

    The parable is this twofold invitation and that day you would invite people and say there’s going to be this feast coming up Set aside some time and then once the feast was ready after everything had been prepared you’d send out the second invitation It’s ready now. You’re able to come and so these people had probably pre-invitation pre-approved, pre-said that they were going to come, RSVP’d, but then when the second invitation comes, it’s ready, everybody has an excuse, right? And it all has the same form, if you notice it. There’s three excuses, but they all have the same form.

    It is this. I have done this, so now I am obligated to this, and therefore I cannot come. Whether that’s inspecting a field, or the oxen, or I have been married. I have done this. I’ve gotten married. Therefore, I have these other obligations. I cannot come. And what is this really saying? I have something better to do. To this banquet that has come, and they said, yes, I will set aside this time for this. But when the time comes, everybody responds with these excuses.

    And so then the host of the banquet sends out a new set of invitations to the needy. Those who will not respond, I have something better to do, but who would jump at the chance to go to a banquet. Those that are not typically invited, the lame, often based on Leviticus, people would not merely not have them in a certain temple court, but not have them in their homes. But he is inviting the lame to this banquet, the poor, the homeless.

    I think of Mephiboseth, I can never pronounce that name right. But David goes and tries to find someone to show kindness to in the house of Saul. You remember this? And who does he find? He finds somebody that was lame to come and invite to his table that could not repay him in order for him to show hospitality to him. And it really reminds me of that scene in 2 Samuel. And this rich man in this parable though, when he has this banquet, what is he going to do? Well, at these sorts of banquets, the rich man would then come and sit at the banquet with everybody on the level playing field of the table of the banquet, which I think is notable here because this was not a soup kitchen. This was a banquet.

    I don’t know if any of you have ever had the opportunity to serve in a soup kitchen. Before, I used to work with youth quite a bit, and I would take them to a soup kitchen. I thought it would be a great experience for them. But if you ever notice the pattern at a soup kitchen, it can often be, here, I’m taking this food.

    I’m putting it onto a plate. Here’s your food and drink. Now you go sit over there while I’m serving you, acting in a place of superiority. That wasn’t until one time we went and served, and then after we were done handing out the food, they said, now go take a plate and go sit. with the people that you just served.

    I thought, this is what we should have been doing the entire time, right? We should have been sitting and listening and on a level playing field, even though we had served them and been providing hospitality, we were to eat with them. I’m convicted by this passage that our practice of hospitality, though an act of grace, should be done at a level table.

    And the ultimate example of that, of course, is Jesus. Jesus didn’t come in any place in the Bible that he opened a soup kitchen where he served and didn’t sit with the people. He enjoyed hospitality with people. In fact, he enjoyed hospitality with the lowest of the low. I don’t think that the Pharisees realize that he is stepping down from his social status to eat with the lowest of the low. the religious people here, or the self-thought of religious people here. Because what is Jesus’s social class? He should be at table with God the Father and God the Spirit, right?

    But he has stepped down in order to enjoy hospitality, accept hospitality here. There is no table high enough to honor Christ at this table. He is stepping down. He is actually doing what he is teaching them in this teaching in 7 to 11 and also here.

    But these were people who had used religion, not in the way that James says, true religion, honoring and helping the widow and the orphan, but they thought of it as a badge of honor, some sort of a place of status to show that off. But Christ has lowered himself, in a sense, to accept hospitality here. And when we sit with the stranger, with the one who is in hospitality with us, we are to sit with them and not necessarily approve of them, not necessarily say, I agree with everything that you believe and have to say, because Jesus obviously did not with this Pharisee, but he cared about their souls. He cared about discussing the things of God with them or else he would have kept his mouth shut and never told this parable here.

    You see, hospitality is to be received in humility. It’s to be given to the needy because of what it symbolizes here. This is the third thing we learn here is that true hospitality, I’ve said it before, but true hospitality is an act of grace. And of course, when we read this parable. We all realize who the host is, who the one sending out the invitation is.

    It is God himself. The image of the table and of the feast are all throughout scripture. And of course is the ultimate end of what scripture is heading towards, right? Isaiah 25. Isaiah 65, Revelation 19, the wedding feast at the end. What is that? That is the ultimate host and invitation of God’s people to the banquet of heaven. And so it should be obvious in this parable, the man putting on the banquet here is a picture of who God himself is in inviting humanity. But what happens? The invitation goes out and those that feel themselves well off, The culture, the busy, they do not respond. They have excuses. They have better things to do. Who does respond?

    The crippled, the blind, the poor, the needy, the ones that know their need. What is hospitality here? It is the humble receiving hospitality. It is the host giving to the needy because hospitality is an act of grace. And brothers and sisters, we are to give hospitality. This is not merely a picture of what God does for us, but we are also commanded to give hospitality. Romans 12, 13, contribute to the needs of the saints and seek to show hospitality. First Peter 4, 9, show hospitality to one another without grumbling.

    Hebrews 13.2, do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers for some have thereby entertained angels unaware.

    Matthew 25.35, what does Jesus say?

    For I was hungry and you gave me food. I was thirsty and you gave me drink. I was a stranger and you welcomed me. What do you think of when you think of hospitality? You think of the time that you have your friends over, or do you think of the time that you have your family over? You see what Jesus is teaching here is that what we might call biblical hospitality is first and foremost not entertaining or performing for friends or family.

    It is instead loving the stranger. That’s the root of the word there, actually, is philia xenia. That is kind of the opposite of xenophobia, if you ever heard that term, right? Fear of the stranger or the foreigner. This is what you’re commanded to love the stranger, the one who is not from among your ranks, your family, and your group of friends. Who is the stranger? Of course, you’re the one that’s not known. And they’re often the unbeliever. Today’s society. Who is the stranger? It seems to be everybody, isn’t it?

    Many of us do not know even our neighbors. We live in an age in which you may have hundreds of Facebook friends, and yet if you ever ask anybody about their deep friendships, they maybe can count them on one hand, if at all. Our relationships today are razor thin in terms of their depth.

    There is a book that Someone wrote that was called The Art of Neighboring, and he had this activity that might be interesting for you to do. And that is to draw a little house to represent your house, wherever it is that you live, and then draw a tic-tac-toe around it. And then start filling out information about your neighbors. First off, their name. That would be A. B would be, what do they do for a living? C would be any other intimate details that you know, their family life. Are they some sort of a sports fan? What is it that they like to do with hobbies? And then D, something that is even more of an intimate detail, something they struggle with, something that they’ve gone through that’s a hard time lately.

    And many of us would struggle just to fill out category A in knowing the names of the neighbors that are around us. Oftentimes, when we’re told to love our neighbor, today, that’s also loving the stranger. Your neighbor is often a stranger. to us. Hospitality is meant to be a way, a means of knowing the unknown and thereby carrying the gospel to the unchurched by inviting them to our dinner table.

    I’ve had many discussions here, I think it was even one here, it has been in our church, about many remember fondly the Evangelism Explosion program. Anybody remember that? It was a program of going door-to-door with the gospel and had some really great diagnostic questions. I still use that main diagnostic question when people are being interviewed for membership at our church. The question about if you were to die tonight, and God would ask you, why should I let you into my kingdom? Well, how would you respond?

    However, some have lamented the fact that it doesn’t seem to have as much effectiveness today. First off, you have to convince them that you’re not a Jehovah’s Witness or Mormon on their doorstep. And secondly, many people don’t want to have those conversations on their front porch or hear that sort of sales pitch.

    But here we see hospitality. is more dominant throughout the course of Scripture and even in the Gospels than some sort of door-to-door evangelism is. And in fact, door-to-door evangelism was never the dominant model for evangelism in the Bible. It seems with Jesus, the dominant model is, I’m coming to your house today. The dominant model was of hospitality, and often this would reach the people, Zacchaeus, or these Pharisees that were considered unreachable, perhaps, in our mind. Perhaps some of you have heard the story of somebody who was reached by hospitality by the name of Rosaria Butterfield.

    She was an atheist professor of gay and lesbian studies at Syracuse University in New York. who after she wrote an article attacking Christians, I think during the time of the promise keepers in the local paper. She received lots of letters back, and she would put them into different categories. And one box was for hate mail, the other was for fan mail. And she got one letter that she couldn’t decide where to put it.

    It was a letter from a local Christian, a local, actually, pastor, that didn’t attack her, but asked if she wanted to talk about her article with an actual, real-life Christian, and invited her to his house for dinner. that letter sat on her table at her desk, not knowing what to do with it until she decided she would respond, because at least she would have more research that she would be able to use in more writing.

    She was invited into this Christian home. A husband and a wife welcomed her, asked her in. He prayed before the meal. He was explicitly Christian, but never gave a formulaic invitation to the gospel the whole time, just talked to her about what they believed, and talked to her also about what she enjoyed, and treated her actually as a human being. You see, at the end of the meal, she noticed that the person didn’t even share the sinner’s prayer with her and didn’t have even an invitation to church that time, because he asked her instead to come back next week and actually meant it. And this started in a way of life, of hospitality for this person, that they were invited into a Christian home to talk to a real Christian person, not on the internet, not on cable, but a real actual Christian. to share their faith with them.

    She wasn’t attacked as a category, she was treated as a person. Over the course of two years of meals happened before she first set foot in a church. And when she set foot in the church, she was asked to others’ homes. And she saw the gospel at play in these people’s lives personally and up close. And this was in New York State. This wasn’t Southern hospitality. This wasn’t even blue-collar Yinzer hospitality. This was biblical hospitality in this little Reformed Presbyterian church in Syracuse, New York.

    Today, she’s a professing Christian. married to a man who became a Reformed Presbyterian minister himself. And she’s written a bit about this. She just has a new book that came out about the gospel presented to her through hospitality, where she was introduced to real living Christianity and where she was treated as a human made in the image of God. She learned about Christ’s love personally through hospitality. She wrote in her book, the gospel comes with a house key. that this was radical ordinary Christian hospitality.

    And she explains it this way, radically ordinary hospitality is this, using your Christian home in a way that seeks to make strangers neighbors and neighbors the family of God. It brings glory to God, serves others and lives out the gospel in word and deed. The purpose of radically ordinary hospitality is to build focus, deepen and strengthen the family of God, pointing others to the Bible-believing local church, and being earthly and spiritual good to everyone we know.

    The ultimate example of this, of course, is Christ. This is how he evangelized. This is how he discussed the gospel, often over a table. Tim Chester noted that Jesus didn’t run projects, establish ministries, create programs, or put on events. He ate meals. and notes that if we are regularly eating meals and talking about Christ and the passion for him, this will happen as well. Others will hear the gospel message and those will resonate powerfully with what we are saying when we show them that we also believe this in our daily lives, not just at church, not just at a doorstep.

    This, of course, when you think back over it throughout the course of scripture, is a dominant image throughout scripture, isn’t it? Think of Abraham with the three visitors, right? What is shared in that story? What’s shared in that story is a coming judgment to save his nephew from and rescue that is offered. What about the Passover meal in Exodus? The coming judgment and a way of escape. Rahab invited the spies in and heard about coming judgment and a way of escape.

    Hospitality throughout scripture is at the heart of and as a picture of the gospel, the message of judgment and a way of escape. And hospitality is the call of all Christians as a primary means of introducing them to real Christianity, to introducing the stranger to real Christianity. And I know there are, there are objections to practicing hospitality, doing it more and doing it in the biblical way that Jesus has called us to do it.

    And one of those, of course, is that it’s kind of scary, right? To actually talk to our neighbors, not through social media, but over the fence, to invite them into our homes. But is it scary if we’re inviting them into our homes for a meal or even just to eat while watching their sporting game that we found out that they like, whether it’s hockey, can’t do that right now, but baseball or something like that throughout the week, for a birthday party? For a neighborhood cookout, my wife and I decided once that we would do a neighborhood cookout when we lived in Illinois to meet our neighbors and to try to practice hospitality.

    And what we discovered is when we invited a few people that lived a few houses down into our yard, people who had lived in the same houses for 20 years met each other for the first time in our backyard. There’s so many relationships that we just leave out there that we’ve never encountered them. We’ve never introduced ourselves to them because we’ve never had opportunity. What about inviting them over to enjoy hospitality, if not on our dinner table in our backyard? It’s not scary just to invite somebody over for the first time once we get into the habit of it.

    And others may say, though, I don’t have the money for that. It’s too expensive. You know, there are cheap alternatives to having a fancy dinner party for hospitality. That’s not what is being talked about here. Hot dogs are really cheap. Frozen pizzas are very cheap. You can get those Jack’s pizzas or whatever they are. They’re like $2 each, right? It can be very cheap to do hospitality.

    But even if it’s a sacrifice for us, what is it a sacrifice for? It’s a sacrifice for the biblical spreading of the gospel and inviting them in to our local church to experience the message of Christ. Many times it’ll take many meals like Rosario Butterfield had to have before they’ll accept an invitation to our church to hear about the gospel.

    Some may say, yes, my wife really needs to hear about this and do this. But it’s interesting if you look through the qualifications of elders, and we all believe in male eldership, right? One of the qualifications for these male elders is hospitable, hospitality. It’s talked about first and foremost with males first. So it’s not just about whether or not the wives are hospitable. Men need to hear this message too.

    And others still may say, well, I just don’t have the time. But when was Jesus doing this? The Lord’s day. You have time, you have a day that’s to be set aside for it. And if we don’t have the time in that day set aside for it, well, perhaps we need to do one step backwards and think about our use of the Lord’s day. We can do this. We ought to do this. We are commanded to do this.

    Jesus used the Lord’s day and we’re familiar with the three categories, right? As Presbyterians for worship, for necessity, for mercy. And yet, you almost want to add a fourth category in there, hospitality. Really, you can put that into private terms of worship, but you see Jesus doing this. It’s a necessary work. It gives mercy to others, and it introduces people to the worship of God. It transcends all those categories.

    And that’s what the Lord’s Day was used for, by Jesus. And we are commanded to be hospitable, and what better day to do that than on the Lord’s Day? And if you do that, I promise you, especially if you do that on the Lord’s day, Isaiah 58 promises, right? If you call the Sabbath a delight, and that’s part of delighting in the Sabbath. If you call the Sabbath a delight, he will cause us to ride on the heavens, right? He will bless our work in doing that.

    This idea of biblical holy hospitality is not a burden, another burden for us to do. In fact, it’s a picture of the gospel. It’s what God has already done with us. In Christ, Christ did not count equality with God as something to be grasped onto and maintained, but instead he took on the form of a servant.

    And part of that was in means of hospitality with us. In the parable, God is calling us to the banquet. The invitation has gone out to us, the poor, crippled, the blind, the needy. He has compelled us to come in by the work of his Holy Spirit. Has he not? He has been the ultimate host, giving us gracious hospitality, not that we deserved and received in pride, but that we were humbled in order to receive. It was an act of pure grace. And if we’ve received that from God, how can we not be changed by it?

    To turn around and give that hospitality to those that are around us. to give it to strangers, even that that might become known neighbors and they might be invited into the family of God. We who have received hospitality ought to be known in our communities as those whose houses are open, whose tables are welcome for the needy spiritually and physically, because we were needy too. Would you pray with me? Heavenly father, Lord, we thank you that you sent out your servant, Christ, with the invitations that you compelled us by your servant and the Holy Spirit to come to the banquet, that we might enjoy the fellowship of the triune God, that we might enjoy being at the wedding feast.

    In the end, we will experience that as we experience an act of grace. Lord, give us the power that we need in order to respond to this command. Lord, command what you wish, what you will. and will what you command. And Lord, we pray that you give us grateful hearts in order to respond to this. And this we pray in the name of the one who came seeking us with the invitation to the banquet, Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior. Amen. Our final hymn this evening will be, if I can find it in the directory, number This is a wonderful hem if you pay the price.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • When Bad Things Happen

    When Bad Things Happen

    About this sermon

    Some told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate mingled with their sacrifices, and Jesus warned that unless they repented they would all likewise perish. Tragedies and disasters do not single out worse sinners, and they call every hearer to repentance, which Luther called the whole life of the believer. The parable of the barren fig tree shows the Lord’s patience, and Psalm 130 points to the redemption and forgiveness found in Christ.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    evening we’re going to be reading in a moment from Luke chapter 13 starting in verse 1. I was with you about six weeks ago, I think, and actually I’m picking up with the next verse. So hopefully your memory is good and remembering what it is that we were covering.

    Back then it was the end of chapter 12, which was some may say a fiery chapter, a challenging message that Jesus had given to the people about him being the dividing line, about needing to side either with him or against him. And this brings us to a question, as we prepare to read, of what we do with a challenging message.

    Is it something that we hear and think, I know somebody that needs to hear this? Is a challenging or convicting message one that we hear and we say, good, the culture really needs to hear this. Others need to hear this. My spouse, my children, my parents, they really need to hear this. Well, at the end, of chapter 13, the people have just heard this message and how are they going to respond? What are they thinking about? How is their heart responding to this message? And that is what we will see here in chapter 13. We’ll be reading from verses one to nine. But first, let’s go to the Lord in prayer. Would you pray with me?

    Heavenly Father, Lord, we confess that this is your perfect, inerrant, infallible word. And Lord, we pray that as we confess that your Holy Spirit is the one who ultimately is the author of these words, inspiring your servant Luke to record them. We pray that that same Holy Spirit would be involved and intervene in the reading and the expositing of this word. We pray that the Spirit would be illuminating our hearts, illuminating our minds, that we might understand what you have for us here. Not only understanding it, but that we would love your word, that we’d react and repentance for the ways in which we do not match what this word tells us to do, and that you would impress it upon our souls so that we would not walk away unchanged, but that your word would accomplish that which you sent it for. And so we pray that you would do that this evening. And we pray this in the name of our covenant head, Jesus Christ. Amen. Luke chapter 13, verses one to nine, hear now the word of the Lord.

    There were some present at that very time who told him about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. And he answered them, do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered in this way? No, I tell you, but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish. Or those 18 on whom the tower And Shalom fell and killed them. Do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others who lived in Jerusalem? No, I tell you, but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.

    And he told this parable, a man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard and he came seeking fruit on it and found none. And he said to the vine dresser, look for three years now, I have come seeking fruit on this fig tree and I find none. Cut it down. Why should it use up the ground? And he answered him, Sir, let it alone this year also, until I dig around it and put on manure. Then it should bear fruit next year well and good. But if not, you can cut it down. The grass withers and the flower fades, but this is the word of our Lord, endorsed forever. Amen.

    After Jesus had chided the crowd in chapter 12 about not being able to read the sign of the times. The crowd starts bringing up some of these things from current events. They brought up, we know explicitly, this group of Galileans who had been killed by Pilate as they were supposedly, or it seems, in the temple. Perhaps another one that had been brought up was a tower that had fallen in this town of Shalom. He at least knew that it was on their mind. And so they started thinking through these things. And there may, in fact, be a connection there with the sign of the times and their thinking of these things. of these events.

    In fact, they seem to be thinking after Jesus has delivered this fiery message about not seeing the sign of the times, the reaction actually seems to say, Amen. Other people, they can’t see the sign of the times, can they? Like when the tower fell on Shalom, like when the Galileans were killed by Pilate in the temple, they couldn’t see the current events. They couldn’t see the sign of the times.

    That seems to be their reaction. Many commentators will at least say that that was at least one. way to take their words of why they reacted in such a way. They were reading, it wouldn’t be the CNN of their times or the Jerusalem Times, but they would have heard this by word of mouth. They would have heard this by those that were spreading the news.

    And they would think, you know, all the signs that we were told about in the prophets and Daniel and Ezekiel, other people don’t know how to read those signs, huh, Jesus? Not like us. We know how to read the sign of the times. Now, have we ever been guilty of doing something like that? Hearing a challenging or fiery message and applying it to other people, thinking others need to hear it, others need to wake up. But in this section here, I think this is so instructional to us. How we sometimes can hear a challenging or fiery message and think that message is for other people. Outside of these walls, not in here, we have our reactions right, right?

    And it makes you start to think about how they were viewing those events, how they were viewing those tragedies, because there’s a lot of ways that you could view some of those current events that they were looking at. We can have mixed reactions. I remember, and in fact, many of you are old enough to remember the events of September 11th and what your reactions were. There was great sadness over the loss of life. There was also this feeling of dread that seemed to hang over the tragedy. There also could be reactions of fear. Just remember in recent times, reading about the shootings that happened in schools in Florida, and a reaction of many people was fear, fear for their children, fear for their grandchildren in schools. And yet, there also was another seemingly universal reaction when tragedy occurs, and that’s blame, isn’t it?

    What is to blame? Who is to blame? Who was responsible for 9-11, whether it was Al-Qaeda or whether people were blaming the Bush administration or the Clinton administration or some conspiracy theory? That was where people’s mind wanted to go. That was their first reaction. Who to blame?

    In our times of looking at the shootings, that was the first question everybody asked, right? Who was to blame? the shooter, the parents of the shooter, the NRA, this political group or that political group, culture, bad parenting, video games, everybody was asking who is to blame. We all become experts on everybody else’s sin when tragedy strikes, don’t we? I think about the time that Jesus was asked about the man born blind.

    What did they ask? Did he sin? Or did his parents sin? Why is this man blind? Who is to blame? Whose fault is it? Inquiring minds want to know who is to blame. Whose sin is at the root of this consequence that we see here? And we draw a line from sin. to misery as cause and effect. When bad things happen, we seek someone to blame. We draw that line and that’s not entirely wrong. We confess, if we were to go a little bit further in our shorter catechism recitations, we would confess that why is there sin and misery in the world? It’s because of the sin of our first parents. We can’t actually draw a line from the sin of Adam to all the misery that comes later. Though there becomes some difficulty sometimes in drawing a line from one person’s sin to a tragedy that occurs to them.

    Sometimes it’s pretty easy though, right? If you know somebody who’s ever gone out and fought for fun, that they’re going to hurt dogs, and they get bit and attacked by dogs, it’s pretty easy to draw the line there from sin to consequence, right? Somebody that you know that has abused substances, and when the substances abuse them back, it’s pretty easy to draw that line, that straight line from sin to suffering. But this passage seems to ask, is that true of every Can you draw the line, as it were, backwards? You see the tragedy and you draw it back to the person and their suffering.

    Of course, there’s an entire book that you can read in which people are engaged in. This is a book of Job, right? Job’s friends are sitting there as they see that Job has lost his family, lost his fortune, lost his health. And Job’s friends have to conclude, well, we’re going to draw the line backwards. You must have done something, Job. What is it? You must know. What is it that you did? They keep hammering on him. You did something. What was it?

    Now, here’s one thing that the friends of Job never did. They never drew the line from Job’s suffering to their own sin. Not saying that they caused the suffering of Job, at least in the past, they did, of course, when they were badgering him. But they never took that opportunity to go from Job’s suffering to be a time of reflection on their own sin, their own lack of love for neighbor, their own lack of devotion to God. No, they said, this is Job’s problem. This is Job’s application.

    He has to learn something from this because the suffering happened to him. It’s a cause for him to reflect, not for me. But what does Jesus tell them to do? This suffering that happens to others that you’re bringing up, This is an occasion for you to draw a line from their suffering to your own reflection.

    He asked them, do you think that the Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? Now, of course, the direct answer to do they believe that? The answer is yes, they do believe they were the worst sinners. They had to be worse sinners because that happened to them. Do you think that the people who suffered in the falling of the tower in Shalom, that they were worse sinners? Of course, they think that, but what does Jesus answer? No, that wasn’t why they suffered. And just today, we can start to do that, right?

    You see a tragedy that happens elsewhere and you say, that’s because of New Yorkers, right? New Yorkers must be worse sinners than us. When the tragedies happen in Connecticut or Florida with school shootings, they say, well, their politics or their whatever, their sins, that must be why that happened to them. They’re worse sinners than us. They must be. But what does Jesus say? They are no worse sinners than you. Do you think that they are any more sinners than you? No. In fact, they’re just like you.

    And Jesus in a sense is unveiling this not so well-veiled self-righteousness. When people see a tragedy far away and decide that it’s because those people over there, they just aren’t as good as us. That’s why they suffer because they deserve it. But of course we don’t. When we react in such a way, we display that we don’t really understand fully the mercy of God.

    Instead of saying, they got what was coming to them, we should think, Jesus is prompting us to think, they got what I deserve. What would be coming to me if I got exactly what I deserved? But not only that, but also we don’t deserve the good things that we have right now.

    That’s the other side of the coin, is to have a time of reflection that all that we have, our protection in this moment is a gift of God. This new day that we were given, this day to worship the Lord, we didn’t earn it. This is the day that the Lord has made, let us to rejoice in it. It’s a gift, the air that you breathe, the body that you occupy, that family, that house, that car, that opportunity or job, they are all grace. They’re not merit. That’s the two sides of the coin. Every day is an act of God’s grace and mercy. It is a point of reflection for us. Do we really believe that, that all of life is in a sense sitting on the lap of God’s grace and God’s mercy? It’s not our natural mentality. The natural man does not think that. I can prove that even within our own culture.

    What is the best-selling book for when tragedy happens? What is the best-selling book on tragedy that people always want to read when something bad happens? What’s the name of it? When bad things happen to good people. Because if we experience the tragedy, well, that line becomes frayed, doesn’t it? It didn’t happen to us because we deserve it, right? If a tower falls on us, if we experience violence or misfortune, then we say, why do bad things happen to good people, good people like me? Why would this happen to me?

    You know, on the other side of that, if you were to write a book about the experience of Christianity, of the Christian life, you could actually have the opposite title, right? When good things happen to bad people. That’s the experience of every Christian, right? When grace is given to bad, sinful people like us.

    Why is the world, a world in which there are tragedies and a fallen world, Why would I feel thankful with nobody to be thankful to? That’s a mystery to those who do not know the one who is speaking here in this passage, the one who do not know truly who it is that is inviting reflection here. That’s the mystery. Not why do good bad things happen to good people, but why do good things happen to bad people?

    The only answer can be God’s grace and God’s mercy. And if that’s true, There should be a certain response to that, to all of that grace and mercy. What’s the response? What’s the godly response? The response to that should be what Jesus says to do here, which is repent, literally turn.

    We know this is turning from our sins, but it’s also turning from just looking at ourself, our self focus, to turn away from our unloving ways, to turn away from our selfish focus, to turn away from our self-righteousness that says that they are sinners and we are not.

    They got what they deserve, but I deserve so much better. It’s to turn away from all of that to a mentality that says that life and salvation are all a gift, all unearned. We don’t deserve life and salvation. We merited the wages of sin, which is death, but what the free gift of God is eternal life. The occasion of tragedy should be an occasion for us to say, but for the grace of God.

    And also to say, if all of our sin really deserves that, should I be messing with it? Should I be delighting in sin? Should I be devoting my life and my finances to it? Now, of course, there’s other reactions that we should have when tragedy strikes.

    We’re also told in scripture to mourn with those who mourn, to bear one another’s burdens, to give water to the thirsty and food to the hungry. We are to have compassion on others. And yet it seems like all of that has root here in what Jesus is teaching, because we should do all of that from true sympathy, not from mere pity. And true sympathy is only possible if you realize you are the same as those who are suffering. We are not worse. They are not worse sinners than we are. You are a sinner too.

    And therefore we act as one sinner who has received grace, giving to one another sinner that needs to know about the grace of God. But in acknowledging that you are a sinner, our Lord instructs us to take the opportunity to reflect on the nature of our life and to take the opportunity to repent of our sin in our lives.

    And that’s the context of how this passage ends with verses six to nine. This analogy that Jesus uses of a fig tree that doesn’t bear fruit and what you do with it. A fig tree that doesn’t bear fruit. What do you do? with a fig tree that doesn’t bear fruit because actually all of these people right now are not bearing fruit. So what is going to happen?

    Well, you have a couple of choices if you want to get fruit from a tree. You have a couple of choices in that matter. You can either cut it down and start with a different tree, or you can try to rehabilitate that tree. You can try to fertilize it, give it every opportunity, prune it.

    This especially stood out to me because we moved to the area a little over four years ago. And in our yard, we had an apple tree and a pear tree. And we basically did both of those options. The apple tree, we gave up on. We cut it down. The pear tree, we put down fertilizer. We pruned it up. and basically told the tree, we’re going to give you one more year. And if you don’t repent, if you don’t give us some fruits, you’re going to end up like the apple tree.

    Well, Jesus seems to be saying that to Israel here. This is your opportunity. Three years. Think about the length of Jesus’s ministry. Three years. You’re being given this opportunity now. to repent. You will be given special grace. You’ve been given the Lord himself, God and man in one, the Messiah walking around and giving you this instruction. How much more prompting do you need? And what you need to do is bear fruit. And what does that mean in Scripture when you see that? Well, I think of the words of John the Baptist in Matthew 3, right? Bear fruit in keeping with repentance. You see that parallel, the crowd is given a little bit of patience, but not for no purpose.

    Peter tells us in 2 Peter 3.9, the Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise that some counts loneliness, but is patient towards you, not wishing that any of you should perish, but that you should reach repentance. And here is why Jesus is saying this. He says, look, the ax is angled just right. And right now you should not be thinking, I wish so and so was here to hear this message, because this message is for you. This message is to you that you need to repent. Not just to point to others, you do. And this is a message even for us, as fellow believers.

    You know that repentance is a lifelong endeavor. That was the first of Luther’s 95 theses, that when Jesus said repent, he meant for the entire life of a Christian to be one of repentance. It’s interesting, sometimes we’ll have conversations about conversion. But did you know that in the Bible, conversion and repentance are the same word? Conversion is just your first repentance.

    And then the rest of your life are the repentances that follow. It’s the same word. It’s the same action that we keep doing throughout our lives. We keep needing to hear the message, repent, not to delight in the things that lead us away from our Lord.

    Unless we look at our sins, rather than just looking at others, we will, if we don’t look at our own sins, we’re going to just start playing the blame game. They’re to blame. And then when you can’t find the blame there, where do you turn eventually, as you see with With Adam and Eve in the garden, where did their blame ultimately turn? To God, right? If you didn’t send the woman, this wouldn’t have happened. If you didn’t send the snake, this wouldn’t have happened. Obviously, this is your fault.

    And that is where the relationship starts to break down, is that once we start blaming God for everything, rather than looking to ourselves. There’s a Christian counselor named Paul Tripp, who, when he counsels married couples, He says the number one problem in marriage failure is not that couples fall out of love, it’s that they fall out of repentance. So to the couple that always says it’s the other person’s fault and they can never see their own faults, eventually they will drift away because they always see their problems as somebody else needing to repent and not themselves. And with God, people don’t just backslide and neglect the faith because of something that God did, that he wronged in the relationship. No, we fall into backsliding when we fail to take seriously this command to repent.

    This time of reflection, even when tragedy strikes to say, but for the grace of God, go I. What do I have in my own life that shows me that I deserve just that sort of fate too? And you know what else Jesus came to do, not only to give that message, but also as he’s showing with this parable, the manifest to show the patience of God. He is patient with them. Three years he’s been ministering and still more time he has given to them.

    What we are, we are not. ones that have no time and no grace that’s given to us. No, we are the ones that are on the lap of God’s mercy and grace. And yet we find ourselves to be that child that, have you ever seen a child that is put onto their parents lap and they slap the face of God. Van Til would say that this is the picture of what we do. We sit on the lap of God’s grace and we slap him in the face. And yet, have you ever seen a parent that is patient with that child, gives him grace and instruction. This is God towards us. God’s patience is mercy.

    But the one speaking these words in Luke 13 also came to suffer. He came to take those consequences of our sins in a fate that was worse than the tower falling in Shalom and a fate that was worse than the Galileans that fell by the sword. You know, we can draw another straight line from sin to suffering, but from our sin to Christ’s suffering. Then the axe is laid at the root of Jesse and the axe is laid at the root of the cross that Jesus will bear because Jesus we see is more willing to bear these miseries that we deserve than we are even to admit our guilt.

    Why do bad things happen to good people? I think it was R.C. Sproul that said it only happened once and he volunteered. That is to say bad things happen to the only truly and perfectly good person in Christ that good things might happen to bad people like us.

    When bad things happen, especially to others or in the news, don’t think that they are greater sinners than you. In fact, if you have been given the Holy Spirit, the worst sinner that you know is yourself. I’m the only one that knows all of the sins that I’ve committed. And even then I don’t know them as well as my Lord does.

    I have a, I have a daily counter, but we are told even in Psalm 130 that God doesn’t count if we’re found in Christ by faith. I just want to end our time together by reading Psalm 130 here, and let this be our cry and our application as we are ending our time together. There we read, the psalmist say, out of the depths, I cry to you, O Lord, O Lord, hear my voice. Let your ears be attentive to the voice of my pleas for mercy.

    If you, O Lord, should mark iniquities, O Lord, who could stand? But with you there is forgiveness that you may be feared. I wait for the Lord, my soul waits, and in his word I hope. My soul waits for the Lord more than the watchman for the morning, more than the watchman for the morning. O Israel, hope in the Lord, for with the Lord there is steadfast love, and with him is plentiful redemption, and he will redeem Israel. from all his iniquities. Let us pray.

    Heavenly Father, Lord, change, change our hearts that we might acknowledge your graciousness, that we might acknowledge all the graces that you’ve given to us, and that we might also, when we see tragedy, not merely point the finger away, but use it as a reflection to say they were no worse sinners than I am. Oh, what amazing grace that causes us to stand, that is patient with us, that if you were to mark iniquities, oh Lord, who could stand. But Lord, we are thankful that in Jesus Christ, in the true Israel, that we have redemption. We have salvation and forgiveness, grace and mercy that’s been shown to us that we didn’t earn, but that he earned for us. Lord, we thank you for this. apply this truth to our lives. And this we pray in Jesus name. Amen. We’re going to sing a hymn. I don’t think it got printed near Bolton, but 421 is where we’ll go. This is the hymn, Rock of Ages. Cleft for me, let me hide myself in thee. Let the water and the blood from thy riven side, which flowed

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • Love-Hate Relationships

    Love-Hate Relationships

    About this sermon

    Jesus commands his disciples to love their enemies, do good to those who hate them, and bless those who curse them. Jesus himself, reviled and mistreated to the point of the cross, entrusted himself to the Father and prayed for those who crucified him. The world’s rule is to get others first, but Christ calls his people to pursue in love even those who hate them, as the Most High is kind to the ungrateful and the evil.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    nor tongue nor hand can show the love of Jesus what it is but His love for us all Please be seated. And will you turn with me this morning to the Gospel of Luke? Luke chapter 6. Luke chapter 6. We’ll begin reading in verse 27. Before we do so, let’s pray and ask for the Lord’s blessing. Our Heavenly Father, we thank you for the joy that is ours in Jesus Christ. that you are, Lord Jesus, our greatest prize.

    You are the hope of hearts that are contrite, that turn from sin. You have shown such kindness to those who fall. You have lifted us up out of the mire of our sin and redeemed us. You who have ushered in your kingdom with your incarnation and your life and ministry, death and resurrection and ascension, bring us into your kingdom because of this. And you call us to a new life in you. A new life, Holy Spirit, we can’t live apart from your work in our hearts. You’ve revealed this in your word, and we come to it now and we ask that you would open our hearts to the truths before us. We pray it all in the name of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Amen.

    But I say to you who hear, love your enemies. Do good to those who hate you. Bless those who curse you. Pray for those who abuse you. To one who strikes you on the cheek, Offer the other also. And from one who takes away your cloak, do not withhold your tunic either. Give to everyone who begs from you. And from one who takes away your goods, do not demand them back. And as you wish that others would do to you, do so to them.

    If you love those who love you, what benefit is that to you? For even sinners love those who love them. And if you do good to those who do good to you, what benefit is that to you? Or even sinners do the same. And if you lend to those from whom you expect to receive, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners to get back the same amount.

    But love your enemies and do good and lend. expecting nothing in return. And your reward will be great. And you will be sons of the Most High. For He is kind to the ungrateful and the evil. Be merciful, even as your Father is merciful.” This is the Word of God.

    I want to talk to you today about love-hate relationships. I’m sure we all know what those are like, and maybe have been in them ourselves. The way our society commonly uses them, these relationships that you’re in that are a roller coaster emotionally. Everything’s going wonderful. You love the person to death and then minutes later, hate them to death at the same time. I used to have that kind of relationship with my brother when I was growing up. Oh, we could love one another and hate one another with a passion. And are fighting with each other and even say that I hate you. Well, yeah, I hate you. I’m going to tell Mom, you better not. I’ll kill you. I’ll come back to life and kill you. You know, the way we used to talk about one another.

    But I knew this. My brother, who always got the best of me when we would get into our fights, because he was much bigger, he was always there for me. When I faced a tough time, sticking up for me, being there for me, We know those kind of love-hate relationships.

    I want to talk to you about a different kind of love-hate relationship that is being set forth in this passage. One where we’re the ones doing the loving and the others are doing the hating. And there are, in this world, haters. We continue to struggle with it as Christians of being haters towards one another. It happens in families. It happens in churches. It happens between churches.

    Jesus is here dealing with the world, but we continue to struggle with what the world manifests. And so it would bring this challenge to all of us this morning. In a world of haters, our Lord is calling us to be lovers. Let’s look at this passage as we begin in verse 27. In a context where You hear, oh, what’s going on here in chapter 6 with all the woes and the blessings that are pronounced?

    It sounds very much like the Sermon on the Mount. But likely here is a different context from the Gospel of Matthew, where Jesus is presenting a lot of similar truth, which preachers do, and was common at that time. And in this particular context, we read about this large group of followers, among whom were his smaller group of disciples, and others who were coming to Jesus.

    A crowd of people seeking after Him. They wanted to hear what He had to say. And they wanted something from Him. They wanted to be healed. of their various diseases and possessions. And Jesus healed them. This is the case here. This is the case in other times in His ministry. We know Jesus knew full well when people were coming to Him for their advantage, Like in the feeding of the 5,000. For a meal ticket at times. You see that in the Gospel of John and John chapter 6. Jesus fed them.

    And yet at the same time, He knew what was in their hearts. And He had difficult things to say to them and they turned away. He knew he was being taken advantage of. And he gave of himself. Now that doesn’t mean that in the end justice wouldn’t be shown. But he gave of himself to those who reviled him. He didn’t revile in return as we see in 1 Peter 2. He entrusted Himself to the Lord.

    And He calls us. We’re not called to die on the cross like He did for us. He calls us to the same type of life in which we give of ourselves this costly life of following Jesus Christ. And we suffer for it as we seek to show love for others. And so he says, love your enemies. Do good to those who hate you. There’s where love is shown, we can say in a very general way. It’s not about what you feel so much as what you do. The affections, they come with it, but that’s not what’s foundational. It’s giving of ourselves for the good of others to do good for them. Even those who hate you, your enemies.

    You know, in Matthew 22, that when Jesus is asked about the greatest commandment, Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul and strength. And the second. Next in line, love your neighbor. As yourself and that neighbor can be your brothers and sisters in Christ, it can be anyone. As we learn in the parable of the Good Samaritan.

    But here he goes a step beyond that. To kick it up a notch and say, Love your enemies. Now, your enemies can be your neighbor, but he makes it very explicit here. Love those, do good for those who have animosity towards you, who show hatred towards you.

    Who we see in verse 28 would curse you as they would curse him. here in mind are the followers of Jesus Christ, who the world tends to curse, to show animosity towards, even when we seek to live at peace with them, even when we aren’t showing animosity in return. And we’re just trying to do good for them. And what do we get in response? Hatred. And they will curse you. If you’re living for Christ, you’re going to find that people who know of your profession in the Lord and your desire to follow Him are going to speak evil of you.

    He said, bless them. Don’t revile them in return. When I was laboring in South Africa, the church there used to speak about those who they would call them bless you brothers. And these bless you brothers were those who were stabbing them in the back, but whenever you met them face to face, they would literally say, bless you brother. I’m not asking us to be bless you brothers in that way, but I am saying we need to be bless you brothers and sisters who don’t go around stabbing people in the back, but who seek to do good for them.

    That doesn’t mean being naive and that doesn’t mean sweeping sin under the carpet and not dealing with those things. That doesn’t mean That we fail to recognize the suffering that we have to undergo. That doesn’t mean in the end that God is going to let everybody off the hook.

    But it does mean that we ought to actively seek to do good for them. Even when they mistreat us. And Jesus says, pray for those people. who abuse you, who mistreat you. Now, we know about abusive relationships and how such can be categorized that way. But the truth of the matter is when we sin against one another, we are guilty of abuse. That when parents are raising their children, seeking to in love, And within the context of a Christian home mistreating their children, there’s a sense in which that is abuse. But he’s here talking about those whose lives manifest this in a very pronounced way.

    They mistreat you because of your profession in Jesus Christ. pray for them. Oh, I do. You might say, I pray for them that God’s justice would be done. Is that wrong? This would be a whole nother sermon on the types of prayers we can pray legitimately. And what we know from the Psalms as imprecatory prayers of praying down God’s judgment upon someone. Is it wrong to want God’s justice to be done? No. When we look at 1st Peter 2, we see Jesus who was reviled and mistreated to the point of dying on the cross.

    He was. He wasn’t just oblivious to what was happening. It isn’t the case that justice will not be done upon those who put him to death, but he entrusted himself to his Father who judges all things rightly or justly. You see, one day that vengeance will be taken. Not by us. One day all the wrongs will be made right. All the wrongs that are done against us. Everything will be set straight.

    But in this life, it may not be the case. We, Paul makes it very clear in Romans 12, as much as is possible, we ought to seek to live at peace with one another and we ought to be peacemakers and we ought to try to bring about reconciliation and relationships. But sometimes it doesn’t happen. And we get mistreated.

    Pray for them. You know, there’s something about speaking to our Heavenly Father, not about the vengeance that we want for someone, but praying for their good. It’s difficult, isn’t it? As we offer up complaints to our Heavenly Father about how someone’s treating us, as if to suggest, you know, Lord, I deserve better than this, than what I’m getting. Because as we’re praying to our Heavenly Father, we know that is not how He has treated us.

    He has shown mercy to us. You know, look at What happens down here at the end of this passage? He’s kind. He does good to the ungrateful. Those who have received his good things and they’re not unthankful and they’re rebellious against him. He continues to show his kindness. And we know from Romans chapter two, that that ought to lead them to repentance. And it doesn’t. And one day God’s vengeance will be brought out against them. But we know that he shows that mercy and we’re called to it.

    As your father is merciful, you be merciful. And it’s difficult when we’re praying about some particular situation and what we’re going through is we reflect upon the fact that I’m talking to God who is above me and beyond me in all ways. Holy. Beyond compare. And he’s been merciful to me. He does good to me. He does not give me what I deserve. He, in Jesus Christ, has removed my sins as far as the east is from the west.

    How then, as I understand the grace that has been poured out on me, that I can’t show the same to others and desire And so it may be that there’s somebody in your life who is acting wickedly and maybe against you and maybe a brother and sister or sister in Jesus Christ.

    Well, it’s entirely appropriate that we ought to pray that that person would be brought to repentance, that they would turn away from such behavior. But the Lord would have us to pray such things along these lines. Father, cause them to see their hearts. Maybe it’s an unbeliever. Bring them to the point where they see the ugliness of their sin and the beauty of you, Lord Jesus. Father, do it in the most gracious way possible.

    Yeah, there are people in my life right now. I fear for them. I fear for the path that they’re on. But as I recognize the kind of paths I’ve been on and can get on and how God has shown mercy to me, my desire for them, even in their hatred towards me, is that God would bring them to Himself, that they would enter into His love, that they would see what they’re doing, but that God would do it in the most compassionate, gracious way possible. When I know what’s in my heart, I want God to get them. I want His justice to rain down upon them. I want to be a son of thunder. That God deals with that person. But it’s not right. As I consider how gracious God has been to me.

    So you get slapped on the cheek? Oh, what an insult. You ever been slapped in the face? I have. It smarts more emotionally than it does physically. Offer Him the other one. And as Jesus literally talking about being slapped, which could happen in the context of somebody who turns away from the Lord in the synagogue and in Roman society, Somebody takes your coat, give him your shirt too. Is he speaking about these things literally?

    Yes, but more than that. And in a way that seems like there’s an exaggeration to create an effect for us. Give to everyone who begs from you. If that was the case, then I would have nothing. Somebody takes away your stuff. Don’t demand it back. Don’t go to the police. Is that what he’s saying? Yes.

    And yet no. He’s not saying that we ought to give of ourselves so much that we no longer do what we’re supposed to do and provide for our families. That doesn’t mean as I don’t know about you, I’ve been in cases where somebody’s come to ask something of me and I knew it was for something that was evil. Had a young woman who was helping out our family in South Africa one time come and ask for money. And as I inquired what she needed it for, found out she wanted the money to go to the doctor to have an abortion. Should I give to such a person? I said, no. More importantly than the specific examples, Jesus is clearly setting before us that we ought to give of ourselves to others.

    It’s costly to be a disciple. Even knowing at times we’re being taken advantage of. Even knowing that Sometimes the good we do for others, what do we get in return? We get unthankfulness and mistreatment. I can think of people in my life, how about you?

    That as you give to them, not only are they not thankful, they see you as somebody that they can get an advantage from, and they keep coming back, and you know they’re using you. And Jesus is saying, allow yourself to be used, to be taken advantage of.

    Even those who mistreat you, I’m sure many of you have heard of Polycarp, that apostolic father who was a follower of the Apostle John, a disciple of John, who became the Bishop of Smyrna. And there’s that famous account of the martyrdom of Polycarp. Could very well be somewhat embellished to a certain degree.

    But within the midst of that account, the Roman officials are coming after him and he learns of it. He wasn’t going to leave Smyrna, and he’s encouraged to do so, and he goes and takes up hiding at a farm, and they eventually come there, and he leaves again, and they start to torture some of the servants, who then confess where Polycarp is, and they finally catch up to him, and he’s in this cottage, and the fleeing is over. This 86-year-old man who simply wanted to serve Jesus Christ was arrested and martyred. And when the soldiers came to arrest him at this cottage late at night, he had supper prepared for them. He would lay out to dinner before, and he would say, for a while, and the account says he prayed upwards of two hours. And these soldiers came under great conviction. What are we arresting this godly man for, who means no one any harm, who has laid out this dinner for us, and is praying for us?

    You see, As we seek to do good for others. These types of things can happen who hate us. Who mistreat us? We respond to them in such a way, and isn’t that exactly what Paul says? Takes place in Romans 12. Don’t take vengeance out on others. Don’t repay evil with evil. Repay it with good, because in doing so, you heap burning coals upon your enemy. Ah, yes, burning coals. I’ll do good for them, because burning coals will come streaming down on their head.

    The idea there is that you, in responding to their evil with good, would bring them to a point of conviction, maybe even their conversion. And you hear people speak about that. How in their lives, and in their rebellion to Jesus Christ, and how they treated people. How they were won over by Christians who showed love for them and did good for them. Who knows what might happen?

    So, don’t! It’s no big deal if you do good for those who do good for you. You love them because they love you. What’s the big deal? What’s the benefit? People in the world do that all the time. We were talking a little bit this morning before we prayed about this phrase quid pro quo and how we relate to one another.

    This for that. Something for something. That’s how our society operates. You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. Jesus says that’s no big deal. You do good for those who do good for you. You lend to someone else, expecting to get it all back. Sinners do that. Hey, buddy, can you loan me five bucks until next payday? Sure. But if that money doesn’t come back, That guy goes right to him and says, where’s my five bucks, pal? Instead, love, do good, lend, expecting nothing in return.

    There is a test of love. When the people in your life, sometimes it’s parents towards their children, Sometimes it’s towards people in the church of Jesus Christ. We all have different contexts where this has been shown, where we seek to show love to others and we get hatred in return. And then we’re upset. Jesus is saying. Don’t expect anything in return. The Lord knows what you’re doing. The Lord sees it. He knows the love and the kindness you’re showing to others. It is not going unnoticed.

    He’s called you to such a life because of the one who has acted that way towards you. the one we read of in Romans chapter 5. While we were yet sinners in rebellion to God, Christ died for the ungodly. You know, the foundation of what we see in 1 Peter 2, verse 21, What would Jesus do in answer to that question? He’s left you an example to follow in His steps. And you are to follow that. And it’s a good question to ask, what would Jesus do in this situation?

    He’s my example. But it doesn’t begin there. That’s where it began with liberal theology, is they reduced Jesus to nothing but a moral example. And that question arose out of a book written by somebody who was a theological liberal. But it’s an awesome question. But at the foundation of it is this question, what has Jesus done? He bore your sins, Peter says on the tree. He died for you.

    And as you enter into that grace that is shown to you, and you know the sacrifice he has made for you, it now makes it possible. Only then is it possible for you to follow his example, because otherwise it just isn’t going to happen. apart from some external moralistic way of trying to show love to all mankind. We need to experience the love of Jesus Christ. And once we do, we can show it to others. Jesus says, Your reward will be great. He sees it. You will be sons of the Most High. He’s not saying, by doing this, you become the children of God. You will be manifested as such. And John makes it very clear, doesn’t he?

    You can’t say you love God and hate your brother. Your love for your brother will show your love for God. The more you understand The love that has come from Jesus Christ to you, then you’re ready to fulfill the golden rules stated here. We know quite well from Matthew 7, 12, but it’s there in verse 31, as you wish that others would do to you, do so to them. At the time, it looks like Jesus was the first to state this in a positive way.

    There was this rule, don’t do to other people what you don’t want them to do to you. You know, we can say to our children, do you like it? You can say to a little boy, do you like it when somebody comes up and grabs a toy out of your hand? No. Don’t you do it to him. Okay, Mommy.

    Jesus is saying, think about what you want others to do for you. How you want them to treat you when you mess up, when you fail, when you sin, when you hate. You want them to scream at you? You want them to write you a scathing letter? You appreciate it when people show pity on you and are compassionate.

    Do the same. The world knows nothing of this truly. I remember seeing this cartoon. Maybe you’re familiar with the cartoon strip It used to be in the Sunday paper all the time. I don’t know if it is anymore. The Wizard of Id, this little mythical kingdom. And there was this little short king in Id.

    And in this one cartoon, he’s standing out on the balcony and he says to his people, remember the golden rule. And down in the crowd, somebody says, what’s that? And someone else says, He who has the gold makes the rules. That’s the golden rule of our world.

    Or, do to others before they do it to you. Get them before they get at you. Jesus is calling us to a totally different life. May we seek it. Think right now in your life. Pick one person that as far as you know, maybe you’re at peace with everybody. You’re unique. Please tell me what your secret is later that you know hates you. Will you alienate yourself from them? Or will you actively pursue them in love? Jesus desires it. Let’s pray together.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • Greatly Forgiven, Greatly Love

    Greatly Forgiven, Greatly Love

    About this sermon

    A sinful woman came to Simon the Pharisee’s house, wept at Jesus’ feet, and anointed them, and Simon judged both her and Jesus. Jesus answered with a parable of two debtors and declared that her many sins were forgiven, for she loved much, while the one who is forgiven little loves little. Those who see the depth of their sin, enough to require the Son of God to die for it, receive great forgiveness and respond with great love.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    Well, good evening. I send greetings from fellow believers in Hopewell at New Life Presbyterian Church. We are going to be opening up God’s Word this evening to hear from Luke chapter 7. We’re going to be in the latter part of that chapter starting in verse 36. But first, I wanted to set up the text before we before we read it. I wonder if you have ever had the occasion of going to a block party before or if they have that in Western Pennsylvania. I’m originally from Illinois, and they had that sometimes within your block.

    You would invite anybody over from who happened to live nearby you to have a cookout. And as we’re going to read this passage, it’s a very similar sort of situation here in which there may be a few people that you particularly invited over, but it was it was open for all. And so it’s a good time just to to grab some food and go over and get some free burgers. Right. Here in this text, there’s an open invitation because of Christ, because of Jesus who is going around and is a traveling rabbi of sorts. And so there’s an open invitation to meet him. It’s kind of an open house for him.

    But you know how if you ever have a open invitation, sometimes that one person shows up that you would rather not have had shown up. And this text is, in fact, that person that probably the host of the party would rather not have had shown up shows up. Yet in reading this text, I want for at the end of this for you to have somebody to emulate, and it’s not the respectable host. but the unexpected visitor. This person that comes will have an awkwardness that sets in because of the scene, but it’s more because of the wrongdoing of the host than it is the person that showed up. So let’s look at the story of this uninvited guest or unintended guest here in Luke chapter seven.

    But first let’s go to the Lord in prayer. Would you pray with me? Heavenly Father, As we go to open your word and read from it, Lord, we confess that the Holy Spirit is the ultimate author of this text recorded by human hands. And so we pray that the same Holy Spirit that inspired this text to be written would be present as it is read and expounded this evening, that there might be understanding from this text, that we also might understand it from the author, from the Holy Spirit. We pray that this would be done in the name of the one who sent the Spirit, Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior. Amen. Luke chapter 7, starting in verse 36 to the end of the chapter, verse 50. Hear now the word of the Lord.

    One of the Pharisees asked him to eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee’s house and took his place at the table. And behold, a woman of the city, who was a sinner, When she learned that he was reclining at table in the Pharisee’s house, brought an alabaster flask of ointment, and standing behind him at his feet, weeping, she began to wet his feet with her tears and wiped them with the hair of her head and kissed his feet and anointed them with the ointment. Now when the Pharisee who had invited him saw this, he said to himself, if this man were a prophet, he would have known who and what sort of woman this is who is touching him, for she is a sinner.

    And Jesus answering said to him, Simon, I have something to say to you. And he answered, say it, teacher. A certain money lender had two debtors, One owed 500 denarii, the other 50. When they both could not pay, he canceled the debt of both. Now, which of them will love him more? Simon answered, the one, I suppose, for whom he canceled the larger debt. And he said to him, you have judged rightly. Then turning towards the woman, he said to Simon, do you see this woman?

    I entered your house. You gave me no water for my feet, but she has wet my feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair. You gave me no kiss, but from the time I came in, she has not ceased to kiss my feet. You did not anoint my head with oil, but she has anointed my feet with ointment.

    Therefore, I tell you her sins, which are many, are forgiven, for she loved much, but he who is forgiven little loves little. And he said to her, your sins are forgiven. Then those who were at table with him began to say among themselves, who is this? Who even forgives sins? And he said to the woman, your faith has saved you. Go in peace. The grass withers and the flower fades, but this the word of our Lord endures forever.

    Simon in this story, the Pharisee who is throwing this party, likely had a large estate, likely some sort of an open courtyard that was indicating to people that they should come in. I don’t know if he had special lighting for this, but there was an indication that all were invited in for this. It was an open house for people to come in.

    And the reason for the party, was Jesus, this traveling rabbi who had been going around teaching these things that he was getting some publicity and popularity for. And in fact, people were starting to say perhaps he was more than just a rabbi, a teacher. Perhaps he was the prophet, even the prophet that Moses had spoken of in Deuteronomy. Perhaps he was more than that, even the anointed one that had been spoken of in the prophets.

    And so Simon invites Jesus over for this get to know you session with the community, even invites Jesus to be at the head table to talk with him. But Simon was skeptical about Jesus, even perhaps suspecting him of not being the one that people were talking about him being. Do you know you can tell that in the text?

    You can tell that because Simon doesn’t extend the usual courtesies of an honored guest to him. At a party like this, it would be traditional for a servant to be at the door when people are coming in to make sure that the sandals were taken off and the feet were cleaned and washed their feet. Imagine going to somebody’s block party and you go and you say, thank you for inviting me and you’re greeted with a grunt. Or you’re greeted just with a, yeah, your seat’s over there. That’s kind of the greeting that he was given, not the traditional greeting that you would expect. One that seems to appear that Simon is in fact preparing to perhaps embarrass Jesus or wanting to expose him as a fraud.

    And in the midst of all this happening at that table, A woman comes in. It doesn’t look like she got a specific invite. She had heard that he was going to be there. She saw the open gate, perhaps heard that Jesus was going to be there, and then comes in. And she comes in and finds Jesus who was reclined at table.

    Now, the situation for what happens next, you probably have to know what reclined at table means. They did not have a table set up with different chairs that were seated around it. You had a table that was closer to the floor. And to be reclined at table meant that you were sitting on one of your hips, so that you probably had an elbow on the table, your hip was on the ground, and your feet were sprawled behind you. Jewish mothers at that point were not telling their kids not to put their elbows on the table. That’s just what you had to do. You had to put your elbow on the table and lean in and then you’d have that conversation that is going on there with your feet outstretched behind you.

    And that’s when she comes in and the narrative seems to present it as she sees Jesus and then It just says the tears basically are present in the text, and they’re falling on his feet. You can almost imagine her seeing Christ, seeing the one that she came to see, and the tears start falling, and she sees that they’re falling on his feet. And what does she do? She takes down her hair, which would have been up or hidden in that culture, and starts to wipe his feet, which is a big no-no in Middle Eastern culture then, just as it is now.

    But Simon, by reputation, knows who this is and what’s happening here. This was, as we would say delicately, a lady of the night. Somebody of a dishonorable profession that is there. And this is when Simon thinks, aha. This is the proof, this is what I’ve been waiting for, that Jesus is not a prophet, because if he was, he would know who she is. He would know who it is that is touching him at that point.

    Now, as we are reading this, if you’ve been reading Luke up to this point, this is the first time that you encounter this woman, but this is probably not the first meeting between this woman and Jesus. some hints in the verbiage in which he’s using that he has met her before, that this is in fact a follow-up meeting, that she had seen him and knew who he was and was coming to him to have more of a second encounter or to meet him again. In fact, there’s not a lot of the original greetings that are usually there for when Jesus meets somebody for a first time. None of that dialogue is present there. And so most commentators think that Jesus has probably met her before. This was a second meeting in which she’s coming and finding this woman, which would mean that Jesus, in fact, knew this woman. And Simon, the host of the party who thought that he knew this woman, really didn’t in reality.

    We’ll see how that is the case. Here’s what I mean. By this parable that Jesus is going to tell when he says, listen to me, I have something to say to you. And Simon says, say it, teacher. He tells this parable. And this parable is of these workers who were in debt to a moneylender.

    Now, this also was a no-no in that culture. You typically didn’t just go to the bank and get a loan from somebody. People who were doing this were usually disreputably billed. Don’t think of walking into PNC. Think about a loan shark or a mobster type. This would be something that was under the table. And if you didn’t repay a debt in those days, you didn’t go through the court system, usually you just had somebody rough you up, or something would happen to you in which they would take things from you. This was usually outside of the legal system here.

    And he has this analogy, this story, and he says, there’s these two people who owe a debt. And one of these people owe what’s probably the equivalent of about two months’ pay. And the other one has nearly two years’ pay that they owe. And then neither can pay.

    And what do you expect? At that moment, you expect that the heat is going to be put on, threats are going to be had, perhaps some roughing up is going to happen. But in the story, he has an act of grace, an act of forgiveness. the money lender then forgives this debt one forgiven about two months pay the other forgiven about two years pay and he asks Simon so which of these would have loved him more which would have been more appreciative of this act and Simon in his answer betrays that he’s a little insulted by this sort of a question. This is almost like getting the question, so what is two plus two? And they wait for you to answer, as if they’re not quite sure if you’re going to answer correctly. Simon says, the one I suppose, you typically would say that if you were saying, I’m a little insulted by this. This is elementary, this is basic stuff. I suppose the one that was forgiven more. they would have the greater affection. And then I love that next verse that comes in.

    If you see, if you still have your Bibles open, in verse 44, it says, then, him turning towards the woman, he says to Simon, he’s directing attention towards her, and he’s saying to Simon, do you see this woman? Have you noticed her? Do you know who this is? As if to say, you obviously don’t know who this woman is.

    He’s, in a sense, turning the tables on Simon’s assumptions there because Simon only knew who she was and by reputation, but Jesus knew who she was at that moment and what her future state would be. She is forgiven presently. if there’s this encounter that happened earlier, that most think she had been forgiven, she was coming to show her gratitude. And in fact, Jesus identifies that in her tears, as the fact that she is loving because of the forgiveness that she has found. She loves now because she’s already been forgiven. And Jesus explains this by way of her actions.

    Simon didn’t do that traditional greeting. But she is doing something that is beyond that traditional greeting. This woman is in a sense going overboard. Simon didn’t have the foot washing when you come in, which was traditional. He didn’t have the oil waiting for him.

    But she is using her tears and an ointment. Now, to us, oil, ointment, they sound pretty similar, but just to put an exclamation point on this, there is a difference between oil and ointment in the words that are used here in verse 46. The way that these words are typically used in the Bible is basically the difference between an oily salve and things like myrrh. James says, use oil when you’re anointing somebody for a prayer for healing. It was associated with healing there.

    The Good Samaritan, when he finds a man who’s been beat up alongside of the road, do you remember? He applies oil to his wounds. That’s the same sort of word that’s used there. And you can imagine somebody coming in with cracked feet, tired from the journey over to the house. Oil would be put on their feet.

    This was something that was usually associated with a good feeling or with healing. On the other hand, ointment was something a little different. Jewish women often would have some sort of a small vial filled with an ointment, some sort of small alabaster jar that would be filled with an oil mixed with myrrh.

    Small enough to carry around, in fact, It’s legendary, of course, the Pharisees had all of these rules for what you could not do on the Sabbath. One thing that they allowed was actually for women to carry this around because they wouldn’t want to leave it at home.

    There was too much of a fear of it getting stolen because it was worth a lot of money. It could be used even in an emergency situation for emergency money. And so the woman isn’t carrying ordinary oil, but ointment. likely mixed with myrrh, expensive oil, and she’s wasting it. This is the emergency reserve. This was something that should have been precious. Many months, if not years worth of wages, and she’s wasting it. She’s not moderate with her use here. Now, here’s the strange thing in the ministry of Christ. This keeps happening to him. There’s at least one other instance in which we see this in Matthew chapter 26 and John 12. That is the Monday before Christ’s crucifixion. Remember, Mary anoints Jesus with myrrh and Bethany as well.

    That’s the story in which Judas is upset, remember, because he said, we could have used this money for the poor, but really he was taking some of the money for himself, so he wanted it to enrich himself. And he was upset about it. But what does Jesus say?

    He says, this was a good thing that she did. because she was preparing me for burial. That’s what you used myrrh for. You would put that on a body that had died waiting for burial. So this woman in Luke 7 and Mary and what is coming up before the crucifixion, they seem to know something, don’t they?

    They seem to know something that Simon doesn’t pick up on. They seem to know something even that the disciples were missing at that point. Remember Peter, when he’s asked for a confession of who Christ is, he will follow it up. When Jesus says that he must go and be crucified and rise three days later, Peter says, no, that’s not part of your ministry. That’s not part of what you are all about. And here these women are preparing Jesus for burial. They know. They know that they need Christ’s death as part of his ministry. They know that he came to die.

    And Peter, the disciple, Simon, the Pharisee, they were sinful too, but they just never seemed to be able to admit it, that their sin was that bad. that what they needed was the death of Christ. They needed His blood in order to cover up those sins. They seem to not be able to confess, not only am I a sinner, a little sinner, not only do I make mistakes, do I mess up, but my sin is so bad, it requires the second person of the Trinity to come down, take on my nature, and be sacrificed for my sins. That’s how bad it is. They don’t seem to be able to confess that, where these women, by their actions, are confessing that.

    Now, who are we in this story? Are we Simon at the head, at the table, speaking with Christ face-to-face on equal footing? Or are we like the woman here anointing his feet with oil? Now, I know the obvious answer to that. Simon is a Pharisee. Pharisees are bad. Therefore, I shouldn’t be like Simon, right?

    But think about it. What is your attitude towards Jesus? Is he a prophet, a teller of good things for us to learn from? Is he someone perhaps we would want to invite to the table and have a conversation, exchange ideas on equal footing, mind to mind with him? Here’s another test.

    When you speak with God, when you’re in prayer, when you go to God and you talk through Christ, through his mediation, do you go to God as an equal exchanging ideas? Do you go to God to focus? When you focus on sin, is it mostly the sins of other people? Remember, that’s the Pharisee’s prayer, right?

    When he goes to the temple, I thank you that I’m not like other people. When you go to God, you just talk to God as a victim. Look at what everybody has done to me. Woe is me. You know, that’s Cain’s prayer in Genesis 4. He just focuses on the fact that he’s a victim and I can’t bear this. Or do you go to God in prayer as a sinner, humble, needing mercy? In other words, do your prayers have the fragrance of myrrh mixed in them?

    Are they prayers laced with burial ointment, knowing that in order for us to have this conversation, in order for the mediation of Christ to bring my prayers to God, he had to die to be that mediator and that intercessor? In order for me to be forgiven of these sins, Christ had to die. His blood had to cover my sins, to save me from my sins. That was the price that had to be paid. Do you come to Christ sometimes amazed that the Lord of the universe, the agent of creation, would even give you the time of day, let alone bring your prayers to the Father?

    Do our prayers have the fragrance of myrrh mixed with them? Have there ever been tears that have been associated with your prayers? This woman has tears in her eyes as she’s going to Christ in gratitude. And I wonder how often we have had tears about our sin in prayer. If we’ve never had any kind of emotional reaction about our sins, you have to wonder, do I truly understand them? Have you ever been overwhelmed by your unloving attitude in a situation, of a critical spirit, a complaining spirit, a judging of others unjustly, of your rebellion and disobedience against God, the Lord of the universe, the author of love, a rebellion against him, has that ever overwhelmed you to the point of sorrow? Have you ever wept in prayer? If not, we should wonder, do we have the true sorrow over our sins?

    Now that might sound a little bit overboard to some. I know a lot of people are not those that cry all the time. I am not a frequent crier myself. I probably would be more of the stereotypical male that keeps it in and cries just a few times a year, usually about sports or something like that. I remember listening to the study that was done in which they had tried the same technique with teenage boys and teenage girls in which they were going through a hard time and they would just ask them, talk about your feelings. And most of the women after this study would say that it helped them feel better. But one of the quotes from the teen boys that they shared was when he was asked if it made him feel better to discuss his emotions, he said, no, and it’s weird.

    But men do cry. We’re just kind of a little embarrassed about it, right? I know in 2014 and 2015, there were many tears across Pittsburgh when the Pirates lost the wild card game, right? Now, we’re among friends. I know it might be a hard subject for you even today. But to think that tears have been cried over the loss of a sports team, which isn’t necessarily bad, but how much more should we have sorrow over offending a holy God than just what some sports team did? Men cry. They do. But do they cry over appropriate things? Do they cry over something that is that weighty? Over something that warrants tears?

    That is far more important. Even tears of joy are not weird, are not strange. The joy of realizing that such a debt has been forgiven. I wonder if those men in the story, if Jesus was describing something that actually happened, had tears over being forgiven two years wages. to know that that had been lifted off of them, to know ourselves, that Christ has forgiven us, that He would suffer in order for us to be forgiven of that, that He would even rather suffer hell than to leave us unforgiven of our sins.

    He would suffer that hell on the cross. Tears over that only seem weird or strange to the Simons of the world that don’t understand forgiveness, don’t understand who Jesus is. What this woman did with tears was not inappropriate, it was appropriate. What Simon did was inappropriate. He didn’t honor the one in his presence that was able to forgive all of his sins, sins of all who have faith. But Simon had no love because Simon didn’t come to Christ as one who needed his debts forgiven.

    He came to Christ as an equal, to talk in conversation, just to have an intellectual discourse with. Why did this woman love Christ so much? Why was her reaction so different? It was gratitude that she had great sins, but a greater Savior. And you know, and some of us look at the scene in Scripture and we’re unmoved by it. But that’s not a problem with the text. That may be a problem within our own hearts. Why are we cold sometimes in our affections toward God? Why are we cold in our prayers? Why is there an absence of the love for God and neighbor in our lives? Where does that come from? It comes from a lack of knowledge of who we are, and it comes from a lack of knowledge of who Christ is.

    Those who love much are those that understand that they are great sinners. Those who love much are those that understand that Christ is a great Savior. And you might say, sure, I sin, I mess up. I confess that I’m a sinner, but I have this little problem with sin. Well, if you have a little problem with sin, you have a little Savior. If you have a moderate problem with sin, if you confess that you just have a moderate problem with sin, well then maybe you have a moderate Savior.

    Who are we? Are we those that have a little Savior? Are we those that have a great Savior? Do we believe, in fact, that we don’t owe to God two weeks’ wages, two years’ wages, but our entire life, do we believe the verse that says, the wages of sin is death? Do we owe our entire life to Christ? Do we believe that? for ourselves, we can confess, my sins deserve that. We say, like with Peter, I am the chief of sinners because we, if you think about yourself, you are the greatest sinner that you know because you know more of your sins than the sins your neighbor has chosen to present to you. Have you ever confessed your sins to God in that way? We sang earlier that great hymn, right?

    Amazing Grace. Many of you may know at the end of John Newton’s life, he suffered from a loss of sight and he was probably suffering the onset of Alzheimer’s. He was forgetting a lot of things. And in one conversation, they were asking him what he remembers. And John Newton replied, this author of Amazing Grace, he says, I only really remember two things, that I am a great sinner, but that Jesus is a greater savior.

    So in the story, where are you? Are you at the table, just having a conversation with Christ? Are you at His feet, overwhelmed with the sins that He has forgiven by His work, by His life, by His death, by His resurrection? Do we have a small, little Savior, or do we have a great Savior? That depends on how we see our own sins and what the wages of our sins are. Let’s conclude with this thought, and that is that Simon actually didn’t know this woman. He just knew her past. He just knew her reputation. She did not know who she is and will be. Jesus knew this woman.

    This was a woman who was transformed, forgiven, regenerated, born again, pure and holy that he had made and he had redeemed. She was the object of his grace, the object of his mercy, and the object of his forgiveness. Your status, in fact, after you meet Christ, after you have been forgiven, your status is no longer sinner. You have sin that still indwells, but that is no longer your status. Your status is forgiven, saint, holy, reconciled, adopted one, sanctified one, son or daughter of God, brother or sister to Christ, temple of the Holy Spirit.

    Jesus knew who this woman was. And if you’ve confessed that you are a great sinner and that Christ is a great Savior, then Jesus knows who you are too. You are his. And it doesn’t matter what the Simons of the world think, or if the world doesn’t know who you are, they just know who you were. It only matters that our great Savior, Jesus Christ, knows us. He knows who is at his feet.

    Let us pray. Heavenly Father, as we approach you, we confess the sin of approaching you as an equal. Lord, may we always approach you on our knees, in our hearts. May we always approach you as those that know that you are a great savior and know our great sin. Lord, may we approach you in worship with a humble attitude. Lord, we thank you for the doctrines of your scriptures, the depth of them, but that they speak of the depth of our need of you and the depth of the salvation that has been won for us by the work of Jesus Christ, applied by the Holy Spirit. Lord, may we approach you in that way, as our Savior, as one who is a great Savior through Jesus Christ, and as one that has remade us through your Holy Spirit. May we approach you in worship, and Lord, may we do so even now. And we pray this all in the name of our Savior, Jesus Christ. Amen. you would take out your hymnals. I believe it’s 432. We are going to be singing together 432. That is Jesus, What a Friend for Sinners. And you can stand as we sing this as our hymn of response. ♪ Jesus, one of grateful sinners ♪ ♪ Jesus, Father of my soul ♪ ♪ Friends may fail me ♪ He, my Savior, makes me whole.

    Alleluia! What a Savior! Alleluia! What a friend! Savior, help me keep Him. Alleluia! Jesus Christ, Lord at Thy birth. O’er the giant stones I’m standing, Be my strength, my victory win! Alleluia! Saving, helping, keeping, loving, it is with me to the end. She’s not one, Alleluia. Saving, helping, healing, loving, He is with me till the end. Jesus, what a guide and healer, What a tender Savior, ♪ For it’s around me that your takes me ♪ ♪ In my quiet years I cry ♪ ♪ Alleluia one, alleluia two ♪ Saving, helping, keeping, loving, He is with me to the end.

    Jesus, I do now receive. He hath granted me forgiveness, I am his, and he is mine. Help me, help me, keep me, love me, He is with me today. Our benediction tonight will be taken from a few verses in 1 Timothy after, in a section that Paul said was a trustworthy and deserving saying of full acceptance. He said this, and this will be our benediction.

    Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners of whom I am the chief. But I received mercy for this reason, that in me, as the chief of sinners, Jesus Christ might display his perfect patience as an example to those who were to believe in him for eternal life. To the king of the ages, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen. yeah yeah yeah

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • Two Men

    Two Men

    About this sermon

    Jesus told this parable to those who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and treated others with contempt. The Pharisee listed his virtues, while the tax collector stood far off and prayed, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” The tax collector went home justified, and those who trust in Jesus learn to treat other sinners with mercy.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    None can overflow, round His standard raging, victory is secure. For victory unchanging is the triumph’s goal. Please be seated. It’s good to be with you once again this Sunday evening, and let me ask you to turn in the scriptures to Luke chapter 18. Luke chapter 18, verses 9 through 14. I keep forgetting that I prepare in the ESV, so I’m going to read from the ESV. Luke chapter 18, verses 9 through 14.

    Several months ago, our presbytery was examining a candidate, and the candidate was asked, if you had only one sermon left to preach in your life, what passage would you preach on? And I immediately thought of this passage. And I was immediately reminded that it’s been a long time since I had preached on this passage. And so I have revisited it, and I’d like to revisit it with you. Luke chapter 18, verses nine through 14. He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and treated others with contempt.

    Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. Pharisee standing by himself prayed thus, God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week, I give tithes of all that I get. But the tax collector standing far off would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, God, be merciful to me, a sinner. I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.”

    Please pray with me. Oh Lord, we are reminded this evening that your word is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword. May it indeed pierce our hearts, transform our hearts, and change our lives for your glory and our good. I pray in Jesus’ name, amen. Some of you may know the name of John Freeman.

    He is the director of Harvest USA. It is a ministry to, as they describe them, sexual strugglers in the Philadelphia area, and now it’s in the Pittsburgh area as well. He tells the story of once leaving his office in Center City, Philadelphia, and he saw a group of men standing on the street corner.

    He assumed they were probably prostitutes. He says the roar of laughter, profanity, and general rowdiness of the group was causing quite a disturbance on the corner. In fact, as he observed this, he saw pedestrians walking on the other side of the street to avoid this group of men. He said he thought to himself, why do decent people have to put up with this? And he even thought about calling the police. Well, that was a Saturday when this happened, and so the next Sunday he went to worship, and that was a Sunday his congregation was observing the Lord’s Supper. And as he sat there preparing to receive the elements, he remembered those men, and he said, I sort of heard almost a voice in my spirit. And this voice said, Freeman, who do you think you are? Who do you think you are? What about us? Who do we think we are?

    Jesus here imagines a scene in the temple. It’s where the people gathered to pray. Sometimes they would pray publicly. Sometimes they would pray privately. The temple, though, was not just a place of prayer. It was a cultural center in Jerusalem. All sorts of people came there for all sorts of reasons.

    And so Jesus tells a parable of the temple. And it’s a pretty simple parable. And so our path is really pretty simple this evening. We’re going to learn about a couple of people in this parable. And then we will ask ourselves two vital questions of ourselves. So who are the two people? Sometimes with parables we make a mistake by reading too much into the details, but this is such a short parable with such details that are all important. We need to look at every detail to understand these two men. The first is the Pharisee.

    The Pharisees were the religious overachievers of the day. They were like your coworker who doesn’t just come to a meeting with a report, he or she comes with charts and graphs and footnotes and appendices, right? This is like the college student who turns in their work two weeks early. This is like your teammate on a team who runs three extra miles without even being asked.

    Pharisees were the separated ones. They lived differently from the non-Jews around them, certainly, but even from the Jews around them who weren’t quite as achievers or achieving as they were. It was good that they were serious about their faith, but it led to some problems. I see four problems with the Pharisees.

    One is what we call externality. They did what the written law should do, said they should do. They did what their oral law said they should do, but they didn’t seem too concerned about the hard attitudes behind their actions. They not only had externality, they had formality. They did what the law said they should do, but they seem concerned with just crossing their duties off on a list. They had externality and formality.

    They also had what I call multiplicity. They multiplied the rules. They had the written law of God, what they were required to do by that, but they also had all sorts of oral traditions that they required themselves and others to follow. And because of their externality and their formality and their multiplicity, they also had superiority. As they did what they thought they should do, they critiqued everybody who didn’t do exactly as they did.

    Now what about this particular Pharisee? Just observe some things with me from the parable. He is in a certain place. He’s in the temple. Where is he in the temple? Well, different translations handle the phrase in verse 11 differently. He’s either by himself, or he’s praying to himself, or he’s praying about himself. But either way, at least spiritually, and maybe physically, he is in a place where he has separated himself from other people.

    He has a clear focus himself. As one writer says, he glances at God, but he contemplates himself. So he is in a certain place. He has a clear focus. He also has a detailed list, doesn’t he? What does he discuss in this prayer? He discusses all the things he has done before God and all the things he has done for God. He fasts twice a week. The written law did not require you to fast twice a week.

    But remember, he’s an overachiever. He gives tithes of all he gets. The written law required certain tithes on crops, but there were disagreements about what all should be included in the tithes, so he tithes on everything he gets. So he is in a certain place, he has a certain focus on himself, he has a detailed list, and he has a particular goal. He wants to demonstrate to God that he is not like other men. They steal. They act unjustly. They commit adultery. They collect taxes for the Roman governments.

    Fundamentally, the goal of this man’s thinking, the goal of this man’s prayer, is to make clear for all to see, including God, especially God, to make clear for all to see that he is not like other men. He is in a different category. He is on a deeper sphere. He’s on a higher level than the common rabble around him. Whether it’s those non-Jewish dogs and pigs, or whether it’s those Jews who aren’t quite as devoted as he is. and are too benighted to see how much more faithful they should be. That’s who he thinks he is. Fundamentally different than other men.

    Every now and then, You read in the paper or hear on the news about what I call do you know who I am incidents. It usually involves an entertainer or an athlete or a politician and it usually seems to happen on an airplane, right? Something goes wrong. Maybe a flight is overbooked. Maybe first class is full. Maybe the food or the booze runs out. And the airline personnel are trying to deal with things and follow their procedures, but that athlete, that entertainer, that business person stands up and walks over and says, do you know who I am? What are they saying?

    I’m not like these other people. I’m not like these common, average, mediocre, unaccomplished, unimportant people. I’m great. I’m valuable. I should have the right to do whatever I want to do because of all I’ve done and because of who I am. That’s what the Pharisee is doing. He is saying to God, and by implication to others, do you know who I am? What about the tax collector?

    If the Pharisees were the religious overachievers of the day, the tax collectors were the societal losers of the day. They had at least four things going against them, okay? First, they were traitors. They collected taxes for the hated Roman government, and people hated taxes then just like they do now.

    The Romans hired the locals like this because they knew the terrain. They knew the area. They knew the people. They were traders. They were also thieves. You can guess how the system worked. The tax collector owed a certain amount to Rome, and so what the tax collector would do would be to collect what he was owed and then take a little bit more for himself. So they were traitors and they were thieves. They were also unclean. You see, what did they do? They handled money. They touched all these things that non-Jews touched.

    You weren’t supposed to touch a tax collector. You were not supposed to touch anything they had touched. They were also Sabbath breakers. The Roman culture didn’t care that much about the Jewish Sabbath. They weren’t concerned about the scruples of these religious people. And so these collectors worked when they had to work, even if it was on the Sabbath. So let’s notice some things about the tax collector then.

    He’s also in a certain place, just like the Pharisee. In verse 13, we read that he stands far off. He may be at a distance from God. He may be at a distance from other people. He may be in a corner of the temple. And that’s okay with everybody. They don’t want him around. So he’s in a certain place, like the Pharisee. He also has a certain focus, a clear focus, a literal focus of casting his eyes down.

    It’s a symbol of submission, of humility, of shame. You know what it’s like, what’s it like when you can’t look somebody in the eye? Well, sometimes it’s because people are shy, I get that, but sometimes you don’t want to look somebody in the eye because you’re ashamed of what you’ve done and you don’t want them to look at you and you don’t want to look at them. You tremble at what you might see. This man in his heart trembles as he contemplates what might happen if he would actually look toward God.

    So he’s like the Pharisee in some ways, but there’s one way he’s not like the Pharisee. He doesn’t have a list. He has no list of his accomplishments before God. He just stands there at a distance with his eyes down and he beats his breast in grief and mourning and repentance and sorrow. So he’s in a certain place, he has a clear focus, he does not have a list, but he is like the Pharisee in one other way.

    He has a particular goal. What does he want? What does the tax collector seek? What does he hope to get from his approach to God? He cries, God be merciful to me, a sinner. It’s interesting, the word translated merciful here is not the word we usually see in the New Testament that’s translated merciful. It’s the word that gives us the English word propitiation. What is propitiation? It’s the quenching of God’s wrath toward human sin. God is holy. God is just. He hates sin. He hates injustice. He hates wrong. And he responds to sin with holy and just and righteous fury.

    Now we know we live in a culture where many say, I don’t believe that. That’s God’s nature. We have many in our culture who say they don’t like that. I would argue that deep in our hearts we do want a just God. As we see the injustice and the unrighteousness around us, we cry out for a certain level of justice. Well, part of us does. You say you want justice, then you think, well, if he’s going to deal justly with those people, he may be dealing justly with me, too.

    And the news doesn’t sound so good. You realize, as you think about it, you have on your own no way to avoid the wrath of God. And when you know that, it’s when you cry with the tax collector. God, be merciful to me, a sinner. He knows he faces the condemning judgment of a holy God. And so he begs God, quench your wrath, free me from the judgment I deserve.

    This all points us to the biblical concept of sacrifice. Transgression has to be punished to the fullest extent of the law or God is not just. Either you will pay for your sin yourself, or someone will have to pay for your sin for you. And Jesus is hinting at what He makes explicit elsewhere. He’s the sacrifice.

    He’s the one who quenches the wrath of the Father by suffering the punishment we deserve for our sins. And so even in His wrath over sin, God burned with love for His people. And he sent Christ to receive the punishment we deserve, so that we receive the mercy of God and rejoice in the mercy of God. You see, that’s the mercy the tax collector knows he needs. A mercy he cannot demand, a mercy he does not deserve, and a mercy he knows only God can give to him as a gift.

    I read a story a few years ago from the author David Kuo, who actually has died since he wrote his book. This man, David, tells the story of his father, who was in China, trapped after World War II, and he wanted to migrate to the United States, so he went to the appropriate U.S. embassy to apply to migrate to the U.S., and he received an application application and it was returned to him with the word stamped on it rejected. So he tried again and the same man was at the counter and the same man pulled out the same stamp and raised his hand to stamp it on the application again and somebody behind him called him and talked to him and whispered in his ear. And the man came back and pulled out a different stamp and banged it down on the application and said, accepted.

    That’s what the tax collector’s goal is. Acceptance by God. He knows on the basis of his life and deeds, he will be rejected. But we might say when the savior whispers in the ear of the father. On the basis of the cross work of what Christ has done, a different stamp will come crashing down for this tax collector. A stamp that says accepted. And so we have two men. We have a Pharisee and a tax collector. Jesus says one exalts himself and he will be humbled. The other humbles himself and he will be exalted. It’s because the tax collector knows that he needs the saving mercy of God that he goes home justified. He’s in a right relationship with God.

    You’re one of the two men. I’m one of the two men. Which are you? Luke starts this parable with some helpful words. And that leads to two questions I want to ask as you think about that. Luke says, Jesus is speaking to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and who treated others with contempt. So you have these two men. Ponder these two questions.

    First, how much do you trust yourself? How much do you trust yourself? Now don’t answer too quickly. Jonathan Edwards wrote that pride is the worst viper that is in the human heart. The greatest disturber of the soul’s peace and sweet communion with Christ. The most difficultly rooted out and is the most hidden secret and deceitful of all the lusts. and often creeps in insensibly into the midst of religion and sometimes under the disguise of humility.

    You say, wait a minute, we’re the OPC. I say, I’m the PCA. We believe in all five points of Calvinism. We’re really reformed. But I’m not asking about the sign on your front lawn or my front lawn. I’m not asking about our shared confessional documents. I’m asking about your heart. I’m asking about my heart. What’s there? What does God see? How much do you trust yourself?

    Maybe you’re trusting in your doctrine, but you’re not saved by your doctrine. Maybe you’re trusting in your service to the church, but you’re not saved by your service to the church. Maybe you’re trusting in the ways you’ve obeyed God’s law, but no one is saved by obeying God’s law. Maybe you’re trusting in the absence of scandal in your life, but you aren’t saved by merely staying out of trouble. Maybe you’re saved by the fact that you do better than a lot of the people around you, but God doesn’t grate on a curve.

    You know what’s helpful here? What’s really helpful here is the 15th chapter of the Westminster Confession. The writers say we should not be content with a general repentance. We should repent of particular sins, particularly. Now, why is that important? I believe that if you content yourself with a general repentance, you will be a Pharisee. If you content yourself with a general repentance, you will be a Pharisee.

    The Pharisees didn’t think they were sinless. The Pharisees knew that there was some role of God’s grace and mercy in their lives. But because of all that externality, all of that formality, all of that multiplying of laws, all of that sense of superiority, they couldn’t see the particular ways they’d sinned and the particular ways they needed God’s grace.

    They had a sense of sin that was shallow and narrow and comparative and transactional. What do I mean by that? Their sense of sin was shallow. Oh yeah, I’m obeying in the ways people can see. They had a sense of sin that was narrow. Well, I obey in these certain ways. They had a sense of sin that was comparative. Well, I may do some things wrong, but I do better than other people. They had a sense of sin that was transactional.

    I obey God, God blesses. That’s the deal. I obey God, God blesses. And so when the day was done, they were trusting in themselves. They were trusting in themselves to do whatever needed to be done to make themselves righteous before God. So how much do you trust yourself? You know, at night, as you reflect on your day, it’s good to get particular. You know, some of our sins are out there for everybody to see. So many of them are inward. Nobody can see.

    Some of our sins are purely against God. Some of our sins are against others as well. Some of our sins are our sins of thought. Some are sins of words. Some are sins of deed. Some of our sins are commission, doing what I shouldn’t do. Some are omission, not doing what I should do. Some of our sins are unintentional. Some of our sins are very intentional. As some of our sins are clearly sin, there’s other things where we’re not so sure whether we’ve sinned. There are some sins we admit easily, and there are some sins we resist admitting. There are sins we remember, and there are sins we forget. Repent particularly.

    And as you do that, you know what you will say to God at the end of the day? In the words of the song, what you’ll say to God is, I’ve got nothing. I’ve got nothing. I have no magic words for you God. I have no makeup deeds for you God. I have no excuse for my sin God. You will say, God have mercy on me, a sinner. Through the perfect merits of Jesus, by the propitiating mercy of Jesus, God have mercy on me, a sinner. I have nothing to stand before you in my own righteousness. It all has to be Christ. How much do you trust yourself?

    Charles Spurgeon tells the story of an artist. He was painting pictures of people around the city of London. And he was especially fascinated by a street sweeper in the city of London. And street sweepers were notoriously dirty people physically. And so he got this street sweeper and he said, come, come to my studio, let me paint you. Let me paint a portrait of you. And the street sweeper showed up and he was all cleaned up. And the artist sent him away.

    Spurgeon said, in the same way the gospel will receive you into its halls if you come as a sinner, not otherwise. Do not wait for reformation, but come at once for salvation. Christ justifies the ungodly, and that takes you up where you are now. It meets you in your worst state.

    My friends, don’t trust yourself. You are like other men. Trust Jesus alone. One more question. How do you treat others? How do you treat others? Luke says Jesus offered this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and treated others with contempt. See, I think your answer to this question will flow from your answer to the first question. If you have a firm grasp of the gospel, if you realize you need Christ just as much as anyone else needs Him and everyone else needs Him, you will treat people very differently than the Pharisee did. You will approach them not from an arrogant disdain for how much they have wrong and how stupid they are, but you will have a humble grasp of how fallen all of us are. and how we all need Christ.

    We’ll do this culturally. I’m not going to stand here and recite for you all the foolishness we see in the culture. We want to rant and rave about it all the time, but then we have to say, wait a minute. Apart from Jesus Christ, the human mind is futile. The human heart is darkened. It’s only by God’s common grace that this world is not as bad as it could be. Should we expect sinners to do anything but sin? We should also remember that apart from the grace of God, that’s us.

    That’s us calling something marriage that isn’t marriage. That’s us chopping up children in the womb and selling the body parts. That’s us worshiping money. That’s us killing random police officers out of anger and vengeance. That’s us calling evil good and calling good evil in all kinds of ways. Apart from the grace of God, that’s you, that’s me, that’s us.

    So how do I think and speak about these people out there in my culture? Do I think and speak of them with a compassion and a humility that comes with the knowledge that I am also a desperately needy tax collector apart from the grace of God? I think this applies personally too. I want you to think about your relative who’s addicted to something, legal or illegal. I want you to think about that neighbor who’s making the most foolish decisions. Think about that marriage you know of that is falling apart because the husband and wife are so relentlessly selfish.

    Think about that coworker whose worldview can only be described as sort of a mishmash of narcissistic do-goodism and Buddhism and materialism and fatalism. How do you treat those people? Do you treat them with contempt? Do you dismiss and disdain them? Do you wish they’d just go away? Or do you pray for them? Do you seek to serve and bless them? Do you ask for the opportunity and the ability to direct their hearts and minds to Christ?

    John Newton told the story, he said, a company of travelers fall into a pit. One of them gets a passenger to draw him out. Now, he should not be angry with the rest for falling in, nor because they are not yet out as he is. He did not pull himself out. Instead, therefore, instead of reproaching them, he should show them pity. A man truly illuminated will no more despise others than Bartimaeus after his own eyes were opened would take a stick and beat every blind man he met.

    You see, when we treat people arrogantly, we play the part of the Pharisee. We betray the very gospel we say we believe. But when we approach people humbly, we play the part of the tax collector. and we display the glory of the gospel and we show people the only one who can free sinners from the guilt and power of sin.

    So someday I will preach my last sermon. I hope it’s not tonight. And someday you’ll hear your last sermon. I hope it’s not tonight. Someday you will be before God in the Temple of Temples. How will you stand before Him? With the arrogance of the Pharisee? Or with the humility of the tax collector? And how will He judge the way you have treated people in your life?

    James Boyce told the story of an elderly Scotswoman who was talking to a preacher. And this woman was just so good at talking about how she’d gone to church and how she’d read the Bible and how she’d prayed and how she’d done good deeds. And this Scottish preacher said to this woman, you know, you have to choose between trusting in these and trusting in the redemption that God offers you in Christ.

    You can’t have both. You can’t be both a Pharisee and a tax collector. Either you’re trusting in yourself, or you’re trusting in Jesus. And if you are trusting in Jesus, my friends, it will change everything about the way you treat the people around you. Who do you think you are?

    Let’s pray. Lord, I don’t know if these people needed to hear this sermon, but I know I did. I’m pretty confident we all needed to. Give us the heart of the tax collector. Give us hearts that trust purely in Jesus and love people the way Jesus would have us to love them. God have mercy on us sinners. And God help us to have mercy on sinners. Because that is what we are. Thank you for your glory. And thank you for your grace. Through Jesus, in Jesus, by Jesus. Amen.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • Cornelius Van Til: Van Til and Machen

    Cornelius Van Til: Van Til and Machen

    About this sermon

    A Morning Instruction class on Cornelius Van Til’s apologetics and his relationship to J. Gresham Machen and old Princeton. The lesson asks whether Van Til’s presuppositional method contradicts Machen’s evidential emphasis or complements it. It traces Van Til’s first published article, a critique of A. N. Whitehead in the Princeton Theological Review, and his position on the theistic proofs: natural revelation leaves people without excuse, but there is no neutral natural theology, and facts cannot be interpreted apart from God’s word.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    Very good. And your other finger. How about that other finger? Let’s see. Acts 26 and Luke 16. Okay, Acts 26. We’ll read secondly. Let’s begin with Luke chapter 16, verses 19 through 31. If you’ll be pleased to turn with me and your Bibles. Luke chapter 16, and we’ll read verses 19 through 31.

    There was a rich man who was clothed in purple and fine linen, and who feasted sumptuously every day, and at his gate was laid a poor man named Lazarus, covered with sores, who desired to be fed with what fell from the rich man’s table. Moreover, even the dogs came and licked his sores. The poor man died and was carried by the angels at Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried, and Hades, being in torment, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham far off and Lazarus at his side.

    And he called out, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and sent Lazarus to dip the end of his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am in anguish in this flame. But Abraham said, child, remember that you in your lifetime received your good things, and Lazarus and like men are bad things, but now he is comforted here, and you are in anguish. And besides all this, between us and you, a great chasm has been fixed in order that those who would pass from here to you may not be able, and none may cross from there to us. And he said, then I beg you, Father, to send him to my father’s house, for I have five brothers, so that he may warn them, lest they also come into this place of torment.

    But Abraham said, they have Moses and the prophets. Let them hear them. And he said, no, Father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent. He said to them, if they do not hear Moses and the prophets, Neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the dead.

    And now Acts chapter 26 verses 22 through 29. Acts chapter 26 reading verses 22 through 29. And the Apostle Paul is giving these events before Felix. And he says, to this day, I have had the help that comes from God, and so I stand here testifying both to small and great, saying nothing but what the prophets and Moses said would come to pass, that the Christ must suffer, and that by being the first to rise from the dead, he would proclaim life both to our people and to the Gentiles.

    And he was, I’m sorry, Festus. And as he was saying these things in his defense, Festus, said with a loud voice, Paul, you are out of your mind. Your great learning is driving you out of your mind. But Paul said, I am not out of my mind, most excellent Festus, but I am speaking true and rational words, for the king knows about these things. And to him I speak only, for I am persuaded that none of these things has escaped his notice, for this has not been done in a corner. King of Rippa. Do you believe the prophets? I know that you believe. And Griffith said to Paul, in a short time, you would persuade me to be a Christian. And Paul said, whether short or long, I would to God that not only you, but also all who hear me this day might become such as I am, except for these chains.

    Let’s pray. Dear Heavenly Father, please bless our time together as we prepare for worship and as we would also prepare to faithfully and convincingly and credibly give a defense for what we believe to those who would ask us. In Jesus’ name we pray. Amen.

    Today’s class There’s a distillation and explanation of Greg Barneson’s essay, Machen, Van Til, and the Apologetical Tradition of the OPC, which constitutes chapter 17 of the OPC’s 50th anniversary commemorative collaboration, Pressing Toward the Mark, edited by Charlie Dennison and Rick Gamble. Unfortunately, this is currently out of print. There should be a copy near you somewhere in the library, I believe. All right? OK.

    So Bonson argues, and Bonson would tell us that apologetics gave birth to the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, because the OPC formed as a result of defending the true historic biblical faith, not against a variant of biblical Christianity, but against the unbelief of modernism or liberalism, a new, different, false religion that had so infected and dominated the PCUSA. The Orthodox Presbyterian Church has a reputation for apologetics.

    In Bonson’s estimation, the preeminence in the 20th century defense of biblical faith belongs to the labors of J. Gresham Machen and Cornelius Van Til.

    And while both distinguished themselves in the field of apologetics, they did so in different emphases or different scholarly specializations. Machen in historical studies and Van Til philosophical studies as they related to Christian theology. Alright, now does this constitute a house divided? Did this difference in specialization or apologetic emphasis between the historical defense of Machen and the philosophical defense of Van Til, does this difference constitute or represent two opposing apologetic methodologies or traditions as some contend? Or one might ask if William Wyndham Machen understand how far from the old Princeton apologetic, the new Westminster apologetic, as now represented by Van Kilt’s presuppositionalism, really was. And insofar as Machen did, one might further ask, did Machen simply put up with Van Kilt’s presuppositionalism for the sake of their common cause for historic biblical Christianity, as exemplified in Westminster Theological Seminary and the OPC, against unbelief that gripped Princeton Seminary and the PCUSA, or perhaps as Alan McRae, that renowned critic, antagonist, and sadly, mal-interpreter of Van Tilt alleged, did Machen suffer from a sort of buyer’s remorse with regard to Van Tilt, wishing that he had instead recruited someone subscribing to the apologetical approach of B.B. Werfel in the old school Princeton, or not the old school Princeton, the old Princeton apologetics. And finally, did Machen and van Kiel’s differences in apologetic emphasis indicate contrary and even irreconcilable methodologies, or were they rather complementary?

    Any questions about the question? Okay, good, let’s move on quickly. To address these questions responsibly and with intellectual honesty, it behooves us to first consider the following points. Point number one, Machen and Van Til represented two different scholarly specializations. Machen devoted himself to the detailed historical challenges to the Christian faith with works such as The Origin of Paul’s Religion and The Virgin Birth of Christ. I hope we have copies back here.

    He would write, Christian piety must be grounded firmly in historical knowledge. Van Til, on the other hand, wrestled with the underlying philosophical challenges. mounted against Christian understanding of reality, knowledge, and ethics, as in such works as a survey of Christian epistemology, or the knowledge of why we know what we know, and Christianity and idealism, idealism dealing with the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, on which was based liberal theology. He would write, the conflict between those And those who do not cannot be carried by a discussion of facts without at the same time discussing the philosophy of fact. One has to go back at the facts of history to a discussion of the meaning of history.

    Point two, Machen and Van Til represented two different sets of intellectual temperaments, preparation, and interests. While Machen on one hand was fascinated and absorbed with the particulars of classical languages and literature, he no-wise felt at ease in the field of philosophical speculation. As a student, he distinguished himself in classics, but he once relayed to his older brother, Arthur, an offer of $1,000 for a satisfactory exegesis or interpretation of a single page of the idealist philosopher Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Poor Reason, not his cup of tea. On the other hand, Ben Thiel, as a doctoral candidate at Princeton University, mastered the complete works of Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and Hegel in their original languages.

    And while he later would write about the fact that historical investigation bolstered the work of apologetics, he would add this autobiographical note, I do not personally do a great deal of this because My colleagues in the other departments of the seminary in which I teach are doing it better than I could. Point three, while Meacham had an immense admiration and commitment for the grand theological reputation of Princeton Seminary, from which he was a student and where he was a faculty member, and he openly identified with the outlook and scholarship of B.E. Warfield, at least he was consistent in his systematic theology, when it came to apologetics, Meacham’s own perspective on and pursuit of defending the faith apologetics, moved away from the old Princeton conception of apologetics in a presuppositional direction. And I hope we can show you some of that later, Lord willing, if we have the time.

    Point number four, Van Til could applaud and support Machen’s historical defense of the faith, says Boston, even as Machen could appreciate and approve the developments in methodology and philosophical defense by Van Til. Now, our question here is, was Van Til aware of Machen’s historical defense of the faith and its deviation from old Princeton towards presupposition? Consider the history.

    How much would Machen really know about Van Til before he actually recruited and hired him? Consider that in 1906, when Van Til was 11 years old, Machen joined the faculty of Princeton Theological Seminary, such that during Van Til’s teenage and college years, Machen distinguished himself as an intelligent and defender of the historical Christian faith, with articles such as Jesus and Paul, Christianity and Culture, and History and Faith. In 1921, the year that Van Til entered Calvin Theological Seminary, Machen’s first major book and apologetically masterpiece, The Origin of Paul’s Religion, was published. in 1922, being impressed with the faculty of Princeton Seminary, consisting of the likes of Machen, Boss, Charles Hodge, Dean Wilson, and the international prestige of Princeton University. Van Til transferred there to later earn his THM from the seminary in 1925 and his PhD from the university in 1927. While a seminary student, Van Til lived on the same floor with Machen in Alexander Hall. During his five intellectually intense years at Princeton, Van Til came to know and respect Machen on a personal basis.

    He was there when Machen was embroiled in the theological and ecclesiastical controversy over Fawcett’s notorious address, Shall the Fundamentalists Win, in 1922. and with the signing of the Alberta Affirmation in December of 1923. Machen often preached fervently in defense of the faith as stated in supply in the First Presbyterian Church of Princeton from 1923 to 1924. It was also during this time that Machen wrote his two books, Christianity and Liberalism in 1923, And what is faith in 1925? In addition to articles defending the faith such as Is Christianity True in 1923, The God of Early Christians in 1924, The Modern Use of the Bible in 1925, The Relation of Religion to Science and Philosophy in 1926. And is the Bible right about Jesus in 1927?

    In light of Van Til’s admiration for Machen, Machen’s personal proximity, right there down the hall, and the obvious bearing of Machen’s scholarship on Van Til’s chosen interest in apologetics, argued Lawson, it is unreasonable to think that Van Til could be unaware of Machen’s position and the details of his method of defense. Given Van Til’s brilliance, it is unreasonable to think that he did not understand them.

    He knew what he was getting into. What about Mason? Point five, Machen could appreciate and approve the developments in methodology and philosophical defense by van Gogh. And Watson argues this. Was Machen aware, this is the question, was Machen aware of van Gogh’s presuppositional apologetic methodology before he recruited him to teach apologetics at Westminster Theological Seminary? Once again, consider the history.

    Upon entering Princeton as a middler, that is a second year student, Van Til began to make a strong impression on his professors, and on Machen in particular. Consider the fact that Van Til had already studied under W.H. Jellema at Calvin, and he had read the works of Abraham Kuyper in the Dutch language. Being, as Machen’s esteemed mentor at Princeton, B.B. Warfield had published a critique, I’m sorry, published a critical discussion of Kuyper’s view of apologetics while Machen was a seminary student. Could Machen have missed this in his personal contacts and conversations with Van Til? Van Til had demonstrated his philosophical proficiency before the faculty by writing the prize-winning student papers for both the 1923, on evil and theodicy, and for 1924, on the will and its theological relations, as well as by his taking simultaneous philosophy courses at the university each semester, with Machen hearing of A. A. Bowman’s high praise for Plato’s competence in metaphysics. And having thus gained Machen’s attention as a seminary student, Two months before the granting of his doctorate in 1927, Van Til published in the Princeton Theological Review a critique of A.N. Whitehead’s 1926 lecture series entitled Religion in the Making.

    In this article, Van Til identifies the author’s presuppositions. He exposes his denial of a creature-creature distinction. He exposes his subjection to God, the author’s subjection to God, to man’s autonomous judgment. He identifies the internal contradiction and inadequacy of the author’s worldview. And Van Til explains why biblical Christianity alone provides the solution to the author’s conundrum.

    So in this, Van Til’s first published article, no less in the Princeton Theological Review, his presuppositional direction of thought was displayed before the faculty of Princeton. including, of course, J. Ressa Machin. Any questions so far? We’ll move on. In 1928, the following year, Princeton Seminary invited Van Til to take a leave from his new pastorate and serve the seminary as an instructor in apologetics. This was quite an honor, making him the youngest member of the faculty. This is what his hero and friend, Das Machin, in a letter to his mother had to say about Van Till’s invitation to teach at Princeton. He wrote, makes him wrote to his mother, the best piece of news for some time is that Mr. Van Till, a recent graduate of the seminary has, despite Dr. Stevenson’s vigorous opposition, been asked by the director’s curriculum committee to teach the classes in apologetics during this year and has accepted. It is the first real forward step that has been taken in some time. Van Til is excellent material from which a professor might ultimately be made.

    And in January… What is Marcus Stevenson objecting? Stevenson was, he might have been on this, yeah, but he was of liberal persuasion. I do believe, if I’m not mistaken about that. But I’ll look it up and try to find an answer for you. In January 1929 Banfield published a review of two books by Hermann Bobing and in this review Banfield called for abandoning the impossible notion of neutral territory in truth or study and insisted on the necessity of schools that are self-consciously Christian in their starting point and in their goal, and I quote, if we would truly employ all the means given us for the propagation and defense of the faith, end quote. And in writing this, Banfield publicly rejected old Princeton’s cherished assumption of neutral or common ground with the unbelievers in apologetic dialogue. More about this later.

    Could Machen, a scholar of excellent perception who had the previous year maintained a close personal relationship with Van Tilt and his wife, could he have missed this? And when in the spring of 1929 the board of Princeton Seminary elected Van Tilt to occupy the very chair of apologetics at Machen to turn down because he saw the writing on the wall where Princeton was going. As Stonehouse writes, Machen expressed his intense gratification at this development. Speaking of Van Til’s special equipment for the work and his great success with the students. From this, it is evident, says Bonson, that Machen was conscious of, interested in, and personally applauded the character and quality of Van Til’s apologetic location.

    Any questions here? So you can see Bonson’s thesis. Now let’s see if we can back it up in terms of put some meat on the bones here and try to understand some of the particulars. First of all, let’s take a brief look, cursory look, at Van Tillis’ apologetics. Is that possible?

    Fortunately, we’ve just been through a quarter in apologetics, so I wouldn’t even address it had we not OK, so the notion of apologetical incompatibility between Machen and Van Til apparently springs from, or definitely springs from, harboring misleading assumptions about Van Til’s view of the use of empirical or historical evidence, arguing for the evidence from history that Paul was converted before that, the resurrection took place, and such things.

    And on one hand, and also, Banquo’s use of theistic proofs, they characterize, or I’m sorry, they caricature that. They get it wrong. What did Banquo believe with regard to using theistic proofs in defending the faith? Unless, of course, this error, thinking that Minkin and Banquo are, you know, opposed to one another, it may spring from an equally misconceived notion of what Machen thought about them as well, about van Til’s view of using historical evidence and using mystic proofs. Now these misrepresentations are unfounded in the light of the published works of Machen and van Til, which we shall see, but arise from faulty preconceptions of what their positions must imply and from inadequate familiarity with their teaching.

    To take just one of many, sadly, lamentably, many available illustrations of this, Clark Pinnock, the apologist, has portrayed Van Til as maintaining that, quote, it is not only useless, but wrong to appeal to theistic arguments or historical vindications in defense of the Christian faith. Unquote. That’s what Clark Pinnock thinks that Van Til is saying. He’s not.

    As opposed to or standing over against Van Til, he erroneously thinks, Pinnock teaches that a, quote, a philosophy of Christian evidences which employs argument and historical evidence is needed, lest the gospel be discredited as a grand and unwarranted assumption.

    Okay, Van Til, there are at least parts of that that Van Til would be in hearty agreement. to explain this sort of thing, and I trust we can unpack that. Efforts must be made then to clarify and explain just where van Gogh stood, looking first at the issue of theistic proofs, and second, at the issue of empirical evidence for Christianity. Now, first of all, the objective proof of Christian theism according to Van Til. Point one, Van Til’s criticism of the theistic proofs has always and only been directed against the proofs as they were traditionally formulated, understood, and applied.

    That is, as presupposing man as ultimate or autonomous. See my credo. for this, and I hope we’ll get to that. I hope we’ll have time to study my credo during this quarter, which we shall see. But just in summary, before we go any further anyway, let’s take a look at two worldviews. Autonomous man, on the one hand, which would be your presupposition, or what we would call biblical Christianity, or Christian theism.

    Biblical Christianity, some call it the Reformed Faith or Calvinism. Now this should be familiar to some of you. This circle represents God and this is the created universe and all that it contains. Things seen and unseen, heaven and hell included. Everything, this is the universe, this is God.

    And of course God How does God execute his decrees? God executes his decrees in the works of creation and providence. The decrees of God, what are the decrees of God? His eternal purpose according to the power of his will, whereby for his own, let’s see, he foreordain whatsoever comes to pass for his own glory. Creation and providence here.

    All right, and as opposed to this, There is what we might call paganism in its various degrees of sophistication. And here, in the midst of this chance universe, which is completely irrational, it just happened to roll out there for no particular reason, we have man. And man is kind of a crown, man is king. Man measures all things. Man is the ounce of rationality. and reason and logic in the midst of all this chaos.

    You look at that and say, how can this of a chance universe. What’s more, it doesn’t seem to work, does it? Because you have all these repeatable, eternal, unchangeable laws of nature, natural law, laws of physics, laws of other schools of science, past, present, and future.

    And he’s wearing a red shirt. And we all look at him and say, he has a red shirt. Why do we all recognize red is red? Why do we all write down the words R-E-D, or letters R-E-D, and say, that’s red. And we all understand that. We can translate that. And why is it that tomorrow, we’ll say the same thing? And the next day, and we look in the past. There’s continuity. Think about these things. Van Til thought about these things. And he said, you cannot justify that in a system like that. Why? Because anything new can come. and mess it up. Now what’s the difference between sophisticated paganism, or paganism in unsophisticated form, and Arminianism? That.

    You just add God to the picture, that’s all. This God is too small. This God does not control all things. For example, There’s something out here that could be the will of man, and that’s something that is outside of God’s reach. God does not determine, according to the Arminian, what man will do.

    Man is still wearing that crown. There’s a problem here. So if you come and make an argument, you’re giving up the goose. You’re giving up the farm here. Because what happens is you’re saying, OK, man, what do you think of of the law of God, or what do you think of these things? And he’ll say, well, has not God said, well, let me be the judge of that. And man has an axe to grind. More about this, you see. In other words, man is sinful and fallen, and he will always give you an answer that he likes. After all, if he’s the judge and you give him that share as judge, then you’ve completely given up the argument. More about this later, but point number two, any questions about this? I hope you have questions, but later on. Point number two with regard to Van Til’s use of the theistic proofs and such. Van Til realized that there is no natural theology.

    Now according to Romans 1, the created realm of nature simply provides uninterpreted raw data which merely makes possible, provided men rationally reflect on it correctly, which they don’t, a natural knowledge of God as the eventual conclusion of the reasoning. Alright, you might say, okay, well, look, there’s all these forces of nature, maybe there are little gods here, you know, a god of the sea, a god of the sun, a god of the sky, who brings rain and everything, and that sort of thing, maybe that’s what it is, but that’s all the best they can come up with, and they may even say, like Aristotle, there’s an unmoved mover, yeah, that’s it, yeah, he brings order to everything. all of the universals, but he knows none of the particulars.

    And we can’t know him. We’re still here, in our own right, untouched by him. Alright, is this the best we can do for natural theology? This is the best that the fallen man has come up with. There is no natural theology. Even Adam in the garden needed to have special word revelation. Look at Genesis 2, verses 16-17. Adam needed to be told. See that tree over there, Adam? That’s the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. See that tree over there, Adam? That’s the tree of life. Adam could not have known that on his own.

    And two, fallen man by his sinful nature twists the truth of God as revealed in nature through his own destruction and must be made alive and indwelt by the spirit of God to reflect upon it correctly. Romans 1 verse 18 of course says that the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against ungodliness of men who by their ungodliness suppress the truth.

    They don’t want to hear it. Why? Because every time they look in the mirror they say What have I done to the image of God? Because, again, Romans 2, verse 15, the law of God, the work of the law of God is written on the hearts. And those conflicting thoughts accuse them.

    They realize, I know the law of God because I have moral indignation when I see it broken, and in fact I know that I myself have broken the law of God. But they try to efface the inevitable truth that God has created them, because they do know God, as Romans 1 verse 21 would say. Although they knew God, They did not give thanks to him as God. And they know they should have, so they’re guilty. They know they’re covenant breakers.

    Point number three, Vancho’s apologetic is based upon confidence in natural revelation, not natural with the word of God. Van Kiel insists upon the objective validity of the argument for the existence of God and for the truth of Christianity in another form. But he gives a valid argument more about this later. Anything, any questions thus far? This is very deep stuff.

    Ed. Would you go so far as to contend that the philosophy of Dorfield and Princeton? I would say that Dorfield and Princeton had an apologetic that was more consistent with this. They were Calvinistic, but for some reason they just dropped the ball completely and picked up an Arminian view of apologetics. Good question.

    Another point, Van Til forcefully refutes the notion that it is useless for the regenerate to reason with the unregenerate insisting that we must. This is how he deviated from Kuiper. Kuyper was saying, don’t waste your time with the unbelievers. I mean, let them hear the word of God preached that they may be made alive, but why even bother?

    And Dan Kill says, no, we have to remove, we have to take every thought captive. We destroy arguments and every proud obstacle to the knowledge of God and take every thought captive to the way of Christ. He has to be shown. He has to be shown that his argument is invalid, even though he’ll disagree with you, and yet you have to leave him with his tongue clinging to his jaw. Point number six, Van Til is decidedly critical of the theistic attitude.

    What’s that? which comes to expression frequently in the statement of the experiential proof of the truth of Christianity, people will say that they know that they are saved and that Christianity is true no matter what the philosophical or scientific evidence for it, against it may be.

    Now God says it, I believe it, that tells it, or put it another way, as the hymn says, remember that hymn that you won’t find in your Trinity hymnal, you ask me how I know he lives, he lives within my heart. okay, there is the witness of the spirit, but there’s more than that, isn’t it? God has not left himself without a witness, has he? The word of God, okay, and yes, it naturally follows that if the word of God is true, then the evidence will fall into line with regard to the resurrection of Jesus Christ and other such things, that the Bible speaks of very clearly, all right?

    But Emanuel is, ironically, he’s accused of being a fetus, you know, one who says, well, just faith alone. It doesn’t matter what the intellect says. You have to believe what the Bible says unquestionably. Do you understand what the Bible says, even? Do you even question your own interpretation of the Bible, Christian? But you understand that in seeking to believe something that the Bible says is true no matter what philosophy or science or evidence for it or against it may be, you realize that in thus seeking withdrawal from all intellectual argument, such fetuses have virtually admitted that the validity of the argument against Christianity is, you know, they’ve admitted the validity.

    They’re saying it is a valid argument, it is a true argument. They will have to believe in their hearts what they have virtually allowed to be intellectually indefensible, if they often are defensible. Alright? Any questions? Van Til insists that the argument with the unbeliever must be regarding the preconditions of all intelligible experience, logic, science, ethics and such, an argument from the impossibility of the contrary. and the irrationalism of how it came to be. The universe, that is, and all things. Matter in motion. How does matter in motion beget love? How does matter in motion beget the laws of physics? How does matter in motion beget the moral truths? Why is your conscience stricken if you kill someone? Matter in motion.

    No, there’s something wrong here. creation, nothing can come in and surprise him. No boogeyman can be out there. No other, you know, God called will, ho, ho, ho, ho, you know, coming to attack God. If you allow anything outside of God’s control, you’ve opened a terrible Pandora’s box. You don’t know what else, what is out there, because God doesn’t know what’s out there. we just say that they are inconsistent talents. Okay? Get with the program! Come on! And so we would encourage them accordingly. Alright, time’s fleeting here.

    What about evidences, according to Van Til? Would Van Til, indeed, as his critics claim, refuse to have anything to do with presenting verifying evidence for the Christian faith and dismissing the unbelievers’ questions without even hearing? The truth is that Van Til did not in the slightest reject the proper use of inductive reasoning and verbal evidences and apologetics. That’s the truth.

    Listen to what Van Til says about the phenomenon of scripture and the use of historical evidence in the defense of the Bible. He says, the point is we are told that, and I quote, an infallible Bible, there shouldn’t be any discrepancies. There should be no statement of historical fact in scripture that is contradictory to a statement of historical fact given elsewhere. Yet higher criticism, that is the biblical critics, has in modern times found what it thinks are facts that cannot possibly be harmonized with the idea of an infallible Bible.

    What shall be the attitude of the Orthodox believer with respect to this? Shall he be an obscurantist and hold to the doctrine of the authority of Scripture, though he knows that it can empirically be shown to be contrary to the facts of Scripture themselves? it goes without saying that such should not be his attitude, and listen to what Banto says about the use of experimental inductive study according to the scientific method. What does Banto say about the validity of the scientific method? He says it’s quite commonly held that we cannot accept anything that is not the result of a sound scientific methodology.

    With this we can as Christians heartily agree, the Christian position is certainly not opposed to experimentation and observation. The greater amount of detailed study and the more carefully such study is undertaken, the more truly Christian the method will be.

    Let’s skip ahead a little bit here, and let’s take a look at Van Til’s view of evidence as valuable. as both offering the Godís children the answers and he so as not to be intellectually troubled when hearing of learned objections of non-Christian scholars and silencing the futile empirical objections of unbelievers to the claims of Christianity and clearing away the mental debris that could cause intellectual prejudice. So the believers can open the Bible and say, OK, well, what does the Bible say? What I’ve heard about the Bible is not true. Though valuing the evidences as indispensable, historical evidences, or the work of Machen, Van Til would insist that evidences can never stand on their own in Christian apologetics.

    This should be obvious enough from what God the Word teaches us. What people think about the observed evidence is affected by non-observational beliefs. Of course we know that. Why else would the Jewish leaders have the evidence of the resurrection and tell the people that the disciples came by night and stole this body while we guards were asleep? In dealing with the claims of Christ, nobody is truly detached and uncommitted one way or another. No man can serve two masters. And he who is not with me is against me, says our Lord.

    In Matthew 6.24 and 12.30 respectively.

    The non-observational commitments, or that is the presuppositions of the unbeliever, They exchange the truth about God for lie and worship and serve the creature rather than the creator, Romans 1.25. These presuppositions of the unbeliever are objectively foolish and lead to the destruction of knowledge.

    They became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened, Romans 1.21.

    And for all men inescapably do you have an inner knowledge of God, Romans 1.21-22, which we quoted in 2.15. The work of law is written on their hearts. One, the one who’s of sovereign power and plan uphold the universe’s regularity. They know he exists, working all things after the counsel of his own will. Look at the order in the universe. Ephesians 1 verse 11 explains that to them. That’s in consonance with what Pentecostal politics is.

    Five, yet unbelievers are deeply hostile to this knowledge. and suppress it in unrighteousness, as we said, preferring to walk in the vanity of their minds and darken their understanding, like Ephesians 4, verses 17-18 says, and 6, that explains why it is that regarding such empirical evidences and the resurrection, if they do not believe Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced even if someone should rise from the dead, Luke 16, verse 31.

    Nevertheless, the objective revelation provided by God and the evidence of history in scripture is such that we can, through the resurrection, know for certain that God has made this Jesus whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ, Acts 2, verse 36, and also Paul and Mars Hill. God has proven that he will come to judge the world by raising this Christ who will be the judge from the dead. We can know the certainty of the things in which we have been instructed, Luke 1, verse 4. And according to the Apostle John, 1 John 2, verse 3, we know that we know.

    So Bantow insisted that the evidences which are innumerable must be presented in a manner which compels a return to the true nature as the confirmatory of Christianity. And how is this done? Bantow says it’s indispensable to present empirical evidence to non-believers. You have to do that. But he immediately adds, I would not talk endlessly about the facts and more facts without ever challenging the non-believers’ philosophy of facts. So traditional apologetics doesn’t do it because it separates the general defense of theism as step one. We’ll use the natural theology to say that there is a God. And then we’ll convince people with other proofs that Christianity specifically is true. And it is the God who exists. God of Christianity. Any questions so far? Time’s almost up.

    A few examples from Machen. Machen did believe in the use of presuppositions, for example. As early as 1926, Machen recognized that presuppositions controlled the divergent implications which would be drawn from the evidence. In other words, your worldview, be it Christian, historical evidence.

    There is no such thing as neutrality from philosophical bias. Machen said, if the separation of science from religion is unwarranted, so also it may be remarked in passing is the separation of science from philosophy. Dr. Mullen seems to be supposing that there is such a thing as modern scientific criticism of the New Testament, which is independent of philosophical presuppositions, or neutral. the results of which can be safely accepted by men of different shades of philosophical and religious opinion. As a matter of fact, we do not think that such a neutral, purely scientific criticism exists.

    The study of the New Testament, even in the sphere of literary criticism, and certainly in the sphere of historical criticism, cannot get along without presuppositions. Says Machen, in the Relation to Religion to Science and Philosophy in the Princeton Theological Review in 1926, three years before he hired Cornelius Van Hill.

    And our time is up. I wish I could say more. But again, please, please, when the morning instruction is over, run. Don’t walk, run. And pick up this copy from the library before somebody else gets it. And you can see this for yourself. All right? Well, very good. Then let us prepare for worship.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.

  • He Is Not Here, but Has Risen

    He Is Not Here, but Has Risen

    About this sermon

    On the first day of the week the women bring spices to the tomb and find the stone rolled away and no body. Two men in dazzling clothes ask, “Why do you seek the living among the dead? He is not here, but has risen,” and remind them of his words. The disciples dismiss their report as nonsense, but Peter runs to the tomb and marvels. As Noah was shut in the ark and Isaiah called God’s people to hide until the wrath passed, believers take refuge in the risen Christ.

    More sermons from Luke · Browse all sermons

    Sermon transcript

    In the 600th year of Noah’s life, in the second month, on the seventh day of the month, on the same day, all the fountains of the great deep burst open and the floodgates of the sky were opened. The rain fell upon the earth for 40 days and 40 nights.

    On the very same day, Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah’s wife, and the three wives of his sons, with them entered the ark. They, and every beast after its kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing, that creeps on the earth after its kind, and every bird after its kind, all sorts of birds. So they went into the ark to Noah, by twos of all flesh, in which was the breath of life. Those that entered, male and female, of all flesh, entered as God had commanded him.

    And the Lord closed it behind him. Turning to Isaiah 26, the two verses there, 20 and 21. Come, my people, enter into your rooms and close your doors behind you. Hide for a little while until indignation runs its course. For behold, the Lord is about to come out from his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity. And the earth will reveal her bloodshed and will no longer cover her slain. Lastly, our target. passage, that being the last verse of Luke 23 on to the 12th verse of 24.

    Then they returned and prepared spices and perfumes, and on the Sabbath day they rested according to the commandment. But on the first day of the week, At early dawn they came to the tomb, bringing the spices which they had prepared. And they found the stone rolled away from the tomb.

    But when they entered, they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus. While they were perplexed about this, behold, two men suddenly stood near them in dazzling clothing. And as the women were terrified and bowed their faces to the ground, the men said to them, Why do you seek the living one among the dead? He is not here, but He has risen.

    Remember how He spoke to you while He was still in Galilee, saying that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again. And they remembered His words, and returned from the tomb, and reported all these things to the eleven, and to all the rest. Now they were Mary Magdalene and Joanna and Mary the mother of James. Also the other women with them were telling these things to the apostles.

    But these words appeared to them as nonsense and they would not believe them. But Peter got up and ran to the tomb, stooping and looking in, he saw the linen. wrappings only, the linen wrappings only, and he went away to his home marveling at what had happened. So ends the reading of God’s holy, inspired, and inerrant word.

    May it be a blessing to us this day, the Lord’s Day. Let us pray. Most gracious Heavenly Father, we are a needy people. We need You, for without You we can do nothing. We ask, O Father, that You would cause us to sanctify this day, this Lord’s Day, because this is, like all other Sundays, the day of resurrection, the day that we celebrate the Lord Jesus Christ, for truly He has been raised. We ask, O Father, that you would accept our praises. We ask that you would hear our cries. Help us to hear what is preached to us. And we ask that your spirit would bless us with the mighty blessings of biblical truth. What a comfort they are. In Jesus’ name, amen. We have in our reading a passage where the followers of the Lord Jesus Christ have suffered greatly.

    They have never suffered so much as they have just done in the last few days. It is as if they would be walking down the street. You could imagine yourself in this way. You were just walking down the street and someone came up to you and just punched you in the stomach and caught you totally off guard. And as you’re gasping for breath and wheezing, trying to figure out what happened, that is similar to what has just happened to these people, the disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, and to the women who were followers of Jesus.

    They have followed Jesus for varying amounts of time. Some of them following him for a very long time, even for years, and some for a short time. But as they have followed him and as they have gotten to know him, they have seen the glorious things that he has done, they have grown to love him and to appreciate him. And all of a sudden, everything has changed.

    For they enter into the Passover, the Passover, that most beloved, that joyful festival, that wonderful holiday on the Jewish calendar where they come together and they celebrate God’s grace. For God has been gracious to them as a people by saving them out from under Pharaoh. and giving them their own land and making them a people. The promises of Abraham and the Isaac and Jacob, those promises that were given to them are fulfilled in Moses and in Egypt and they’re coming out of Egypt and they come to this holiday in which they eat lamb and do all these different festivals.

    It is a joyful time, but it has ended in heartache for them for this one that they love. has died, he has been crucified. Certainly this is for them the most eventful Passover season they have ever been a part of. Because this one that they loved, they have eaten with him, particularly the disciples, and he has been carted off, he has been taken, he has been crucified.

    That most horrible, most torturous way of dying He has died. And then the Sabbath came. The Sabbath for them, we must understand, is Saturday. Now, what they were able to do on Friday was just a little bit, just a little bit of preparation. They wrapped him. And they would have by that time covered him with 75 pounds worth of oils and of spices. We’re told that in John’s gospel, 75 pounds. Part of the embalming process, but they’re not done yet. You see, it seems that it was a rushed job. They had to finish soon. They had to finish before sundown.

    And then the Sabbath comes. The Sabbath day is Saturday, the day that they must wait, they must worship, and they must praise God. But what a difficult day it must have been to worship on that Saturday. We could say that last Sabbath of the Old Covenant. that last Sabbath, which would make the way for the first Sabbath of the New Covenant, which they are about to witness.

    But they don’t know it. They don’t realize the significance of all of the events that have just taken place. For they go to finish the job. For 75 pounds of anointing is not enough. Suddenly they would not have anointed the body. It was already anointed enough and wrapped. As I said on December 25th of last year, the Lord Jesus Christ was wrapped at his birth. And he was wrapped at his death. He is wrapped in burial clothing, in a burial shroud.

    And they’ll just finish Sunday morning, we’ll finish the things that we have started. And so we come to our text where it says, very early in the morning, they come very early. It even says at deep dawn, In the Greek, at deepest dawn, early dawn, they come and they come to finish the job. And they bring all of these spices, all of these things to finish.

    Who are these women? These are very significant women, at least two of them are significant, biblically speaking. They’re all significant to God, but on the pages of scripture we read that one is Mary Magdalene. What is significant about this woman? By the grace of God, the Lord Jesus Christ drove seven demons out from her. This is one who loves much because Much has been given to her by grace.

    There is Joanna, the wife of Husa, which is Herod’s household manager. This is significant as well. One of the women who followed Jesus was married to a man who was very high up in Herod’s kingdom. Very significant. And then we have another woman who seems to always be accompanying the others. What I want you to see about what these women do is that this is simultaneously, these actions that they’re doing, these are simultaneously an example of their love and devotion and their lack of faith. Those two things hang together here.

    Deep love for the Lord Jesus but lack of faith to get up so early and to be so diligent in this. You know, if they did not love the Lord Jesus, they could have said, well, we’ll just wait. We can do it in the middle of the day. We’ve got things that we can do. No, they do it early because they loved him. but it is lack of faith, because he told them that these things were going to happen, and they have not listened.

    So they’re walking, they’re walking, and the stone is rolled away. There’s no discussion about who’s going to roll it away, and we’re not sure how they even planned to roll it away in the first place. But it was rolled away, and they enter in, and they do not see the Lord Jesus. Where is he? and they’re perplexed and they don’t understand. And then they see these two men. It says that they are two men, but we’re told elsewhere in other gospels and other places, but these are two angels.

    And these did not simply look like ordinary men or ordinary young men as Mark would have us to understand. For these were ones who had dazzling apparel dazzling like lightning. The words that are used to describe what they are like, the same word can be found in Luke 17, 24, where Jesus says, as the lightning flashes and lights up the sky from one side to the other, so will the Son of Man be in His day. The Lord Jesus Christ is saying, It will be like flash of lightning. The same words are used to describe the clothing, the apparel of these angels.

    This must have been quite a sight. Can you imagine to see someone who would look like their clothing is on fire or like it is flashing, yet they are not burned up? That is the case with these angels. That is what they saw. And then these angels begin to chide them.

    And they say, why do you look for the living among the dead? I’m very grateful for the way that the NASV is translated, because it has one capital O-N-G. It’s not there in the Greek per se, but it is certainly implied. The angels are not just saying, why are you looking for living people among dead people?

    What he’s implying is, why are you looking for the one who is life himself? Why are you looking for him among the dead? chiding them, not making fun of them, but they’re just getting them to realize, do you see the mistake that you’re making? This is the one who has told you that he is the resurrection and the life. This is the one who is life in himself.

    Why are you looking for life, the living one, among the dead? What an absurdity you women are doing. He is not here. He is risen. Meaning that the one who is life itself is now eschatological end time life. for this they are not sure what to make of it. But surely we must understand that if Luke says that they’ve been told at least many times, then he has told them that.

    Luke 9.22 says, the Son of Man, this is Jesus speaking, must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and on the third day, raised from the dead. All Jesus should have needed to do was say it once, but in His grace, He tells them twice.

    In 9.44, He says, the Son of Man is about to be delivered into the hands of men. And then, the third time, within Luke’s Gospel, they hear it again. Luke 18, 31-33, See, we are going to Jerusalem, and everything that is written about the Son of Man by the prophets will be accomplished. For He will be delivered over to the Gentiles, and will be mocked, and shamefully treated, and spit upon. And after flogging Him, they will kill Him. And on the third day, He will rise And now they remember.

    Now they can remember what it was that He said. They have been so blinded by the events that they are not putting it in perspective. In perspective of the revealed Scriptures of the Old Testament. And they have not even put it in perspective of what Jesus has told them as the Word of Truth Himself speaking to them. But now they get it. Now they understand. And it must have been for these women. Like the refreshment of a cold glass of water when you are thirsty on a hot day. How refreshing this must have been. Now we understand.

    You would think that they would just be able to go and tell everyone, tell the disciples who have also heard this, but the disciples seem to be as blind as they had been. So they go and tell the disciples, they tell other people, there are other women who are helping them, tell them these things, and it seems to them to be just an idle tale. We can understand why they would think that. For surely the idea of a man rising from the dead may sound too good to be true.

    But Jesus has said it. He has revealed it. So Peter. Peter the empiricist, the one who must see for himself, what does he do? He listens to this. He runs to that tomb and he looks in and he sees that there is no body there. Now in our minds, Peter just runs and he’s there. And then he’s going back.

    But in his mind, what must have been going through it? Must he have been thinking, what if it’s true? What does all this mean? What does this all have to do with everything? How am I to understand anything now? Maybe he was partaking of that cold glass of water eventually as well, and realizing, this is true. And now I realize that the scriptures are fulfilled in him.

    And what he had said is true, that his crucifixion is no accident. But what is to be made of me? For I denied Him at that most crucial moment. I denied Him, and I denied Him thrice. And there is that amazing passage in God’s Word in one of the other Gospels where Jesus is being crucified, and what does Peter do? He’s denying the Lord Jesus Christ, and their eyes met. Oh, how that image of seeing the Lord Jesus Christ looking into Peter’s eyes must have been burned upon his memory. What is to be made of me? What am I to think? What am I to do with this?

    And so he leaves, he goes home marveling at what had happened. This one who had once said, you are the Christ, the son of the living God. This one is going to his home and he is marveling. And that is the last instance of the name Peter in this gospel. We do not hear from Peter. His name is not mentioned. Some people would say he may be one of the ones on the road to Emmaus. This is the last mentioning of Peter.

    What are we to do with this? To use language borrowed from our larger catechism, how is this to bear fruit in our life, what we have just read. This about the women finding the body, finding no body rather, and the angels, the discussion with the angels, and running to tell people, and then Peter being perplexed and marveling and running. What are we to do with this? How does this apply to us? There are many people in our day and age who are obsessed with application in sermons. And it is a good thing to want application in sermons. But here’s the thing, when they want to apply the scriptures, they want to imply imperatives.

    Therefore, you must do this and this and this. And because this has happened, you must do this and this and this. Well, what should you do or what do you learn from a passage like this? I dare say, if we were to apply this passage to ourselves, there are many hollow ways that it could be applied to us.

    Let me just try a few. If you are ever in the first century and you see an angel, trust what he says. Or listen to the women in your life. I certainly think it’s good to listen to the women in our lives. That’s not what this text is saying. That’s not what we learn. While we have brothers and sisters who are obsessed with application, and believe me, I love application as well, I think that our understanding of application is indicative of our individualism. Our individualism even as a corporate body, even as American Western Christians. We want the sermon to speak to me, to hit me right where I need to be hit. We want the ancient text to get at me and to speak to me. We want the preacher to say, that is, wow, that is exactly what I wanted to hear. That’s exactly what I needed. And there are times that the Lord does that by His Spirit. And I don’t discount that.

    But I think if we are to have a truly apostolic understanding of the application of Scripture, we do not apply the text to you. I think apostolically speaking, the right understanding of application is to apply you, the believers in Christ, to the text. to apply you to the events of the past, to the great redemptive historical events that God has wrought in time and space history. That is what the preacher applies us to, I think. I mean, test my theory, if you will. Won’t you go with me to 1 Peter chapter one, where we will see if I’m right about this or if Peter uses this understanding of application. 1 Peter chapter 1, 3.

    What are we to make of all of these grand events and marveling about this one who has been raised from the dead? 1 Peter chapter 1 verse 3, Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. According to His great mercy, He has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. You understand how wonderful this is? Peter, this one, he is applying the scripture, but he’s saying, Jesus Christ has been raised from the dead, and you are, in a sense, a participator in that. In fact, because he has been born from the dead, he has been resurrected from the dead, we are born again. Jesus Christ is the firstborn from the dead. And we are following Him in that if we are trusting in the Lord Jesus Christ. You see how these events, these things come together. Christ’s resurrection and your being born again. These two are brought together.

    He continues, 1 Peter 1.20. Let’s see how Peter continues to apply these events about which he marveled at one time.

    1 Peter 1.20, He was foreknown before the foundation of the world, but was made manifest in the last times for your sake, who through Him are believers in Christ, who raised Him from the dead and gave Him glory, so that your faith and hope are not in vain. You see the way that the Apostle Peter is now applying these events. He’s applying those who would be his hearers or his readers to these events saying he has been raised and our faith and our hope is in him. What Peter is doing is no different than what the Apostle Paul is doing.

    The Apostle Paul says in Galatians 2.20, I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live. Paul was not crucified with Christ. You see the way that he’s applying himself to the event. Does not the Apostle Paul say that we die with Christ and we are raised with Christ?

    He certainly, certainly does. But what the apostles do is not all that different from what the prophets had done before them. Our first reading was from Noah and the Genesis events and what happens there. It’s the day. It’s the day that the rains are going to come. The sky is going to open up. The flood gates of the earth are going to open up and it’s going to flood.

    And Noah says, you’ve got to come in. He’s been preaching it for a long time. You’ve got to come into this place. And of course they had mocked him all until that time. He gathers the animals, he puts them into their chambers. He brings his sons and their wives and his wife, and the Lord closes the door. That’s what the text says. The Lord himself is the one who does it. It’s not Noah committing some sort of murder. There’s nothing that we can say against him. The Lord is closing it.

    And then, what does Isaiah do? Isaiah, in our reading, he is preaching, and he is applying the people of his age, of his day, he is applying them to that event during the time of Noah. For look what he says in 26, 20, and 25, the Hebrew is very similar.

    It says, come, my people, enter your chambers and shut your doors behind you. That’s the part that’s really close in Hebrew. Shut the doors behind you. Hide yourselves for a little while until the fury has passed by. Isaiah’s just applying this as well. These ancient events, he’s saying you must hide yourself in your God. You must take refuge in Him, because wrath is coming.

    And we come back to Peter. One last passage where we see that Peter is doing this, because I think that he’s borrowing from Isaiah, who is borrowing from Moses in Genesis, 1 Peter 3, 18. This is one of the most complex passages, maybe the most complex passage in all of the New Testament. But I’m going to sum it up to you very briefly after we read it.

    Listen to this, 1 Peter 3, 18, For Christ also suffered for sins, remember he’s bringing these events in, the righteous for the unrighteous that he might bring us to God. being put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the Spirit, in which He went and proclaimed to the spirits in heaven, because they formerly did not obey when God’s patience waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is eight persons, were brought safely through water. Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body, but as an appeal to God for a good conscience through the resurrection of Christ. Peter is bringing these events together.

    He’s saying, do you understand the significance of that ark? that those who entered into it had listened to the preaching of Christ because Christ was preaching through Noah. And when Christ was preaching through Noah and the time was ended, it was closed and those who were in the ark were baptized. Just like those who were outside, they were baptized as well. The baptism of one is unto death, but the baptism of the other is baptism unto death to self and entering into a new world. And that is what they did. They entered into a new world, in a sense. The same world, but it had been erased, it had been changed. Creation images are used constantly in Genesis chapter 8, where they enter the new world.

    Do you understand the significance of that? Because what Peter is saying, how he is interpreting the resurrection of Christ, he is saying that because of Christ, the one who suffered for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, the one who is made alive in the Spirit, is your ark. Does not Paul say, we are baptized in Christ and raised to newness of life?

    That certainly is the case. That is how Peter would apply these things. Not giving simple explanations to you of what you must do. Don’t swear, don’t do this, don’t do that. He’s saying, you were there. This baptism now saves you, not physical water baptism, but being in Christ and being baptized in Him. We are united to Christ. The Bible says constantly and especially in Paul, we are in Christ, in Christ, in Christ. We are in Christ because He is our ark. He is our refuge and our safety, the place where we dwell. And these are not cunningly devised fables.

    As I said, the Lord Jesus Christ on December 25th, I said he was clothed in his birth, clothed at his death. Bookends to his humiliation. But on that third day, he was clothed with something else. He was clothed with righteousness and truth and with a body that will not pass away. And we are applied to that as well because we will have a body like and done to his. We will be raised just like him. He will be clothed. He is clothed. We will be clothed in righteousness, clothed in end-time resurrection.

    And so we will praise God, who is our refuge and our strength, the one who has been raised. May we understand the Scriptures this way. How deep it is to understand the way that the Apostles apply the Scriptures. Applying us to those events who are true believers in Christ. May we be found in Christ today. In His name, let us pray. Our Heavenly Father, we thank You for the joys and the comfort of being in Christ. We ask, O Father, that You would cause us all to be found in Him on that day, and we would even be found in Him even now. We thank You for these great, amazing, wonderful events that You have shown to us.

    The sermon text provided above is derived from the sermon audio recording making use of generative tools. It has not been manually edited. While transcription tools have a high degree of accuracy, the output may include generative textual, punctuation, and/or formatting errors.